I have a question - where are the Lit experts?

[hobbit.]

Elitist ^^^^^

Eh? all of your burnt out squats are belonging to us?

Madam chipbuttyfly has spent to long in the south. You still have a chance, with the extreme counter balance of time in't yorkshire....

 

[Sean]

Eh? all of your burnt out squats are belonging to us?

Madam chipbuttyfly has spent to long in the south. You still have a chance, with the extreme counter balance of time in't yorkshire....

There was a food co-op from Wythenshawe on R4 this afternoon. Made me proper nostalgic.

 

[Disgustipated]

Poor VBM. His thread subjected to a British Invasion.

 

[Sean]

Poor VBM. His thread subjected to a British Invasion.

Groovy, baby!

 

[Wife of Bath]

I could use a British invasion myself.

heyo!

 

[Quoll]

i wish i could find a newspaper article i read when i was in college about a married couple, both of whom had had sex change operations.

Could only be better if they both had hyphenated surnames which they combined to make the family name and their offspring married someone with a hyphenated surname which they combined...

 

[mark197205]

I could use a British invasion myself.

heyo!

Be careful what you wish for..

 

[pink]

I could use a British invasion myself.

heyo!

No shit. add me to that list.

 

[Wife of Bath]

Be careful what you wish for..

I'm a sucker for a hot accent.

Literally.

 

[mark197205]

No shit. add me to that list.

Hey Pinkie.

I'm a sucker for a hot accent.

Literally.

*makes notes*

 

[pink]

Hey Pinkie.



*makes notes*

Hey Mr Mark.

 

[mark197205]

Hey Mr Mark.

How're you doing miss party in your pants?

 

[Loring2]

Jesus fucking Christ...where do you think you are???? EVERYONE on the GB is an expert and knows everything FFS!!!

Now if the party of the first part knew the party of the second part at one time had genitalia that was similar to the party of the first part and the party of the first part engaged in sex with the party of the second part while those genitalia were present, then the party of the third part can call the party of the first part a homosexual. BUT, if the party of the first part had no knowledge of the removed genitalia and had vaginal (constructed as opposed to natural vagina) sex with the party of the second part while believing the vaginal construct was natural then the part of the the third part can in no way assume or imply the party of the first part is homosexual.

Simple...

Comshaw

Of course, it's easy to see now that you've put it so simply.