Obama and the Democrats want higher taxes

RightField

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 30, 2003
Posts
9,361
That's really the bottom line isn't it? No one was calling for higher taxes until the Democrats increased spending dramatically. That's the bottom line, isn't it?

Of course, they should concentrate on collecting the taxes they already owe first.

Thousands of federal workers owe back taxes
By KEN THOMAS | Associated Press – 22 hours ago.. .

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama has preached that all Americans should pay their fair share in taxes, but a government report finds that tens of thousands of federal employees — from staffers in Congress to federal agencies and even Obama's executive office — collectively owe the government billions in back taxes.

Data from the Internal Revenue Service found that more than 279,000 federal employees and retirees owed $3.4 billion in back income taxes as of Sept. 30, 2010.

The data showed that 467 employees of the House of Representatives, or about 4.2 percent of the workforce, owed more than $8.5 million. In the Senate, 217 employees, or about 3 percent of the workforce, owed $2.13 million.

Obama's staff was not immune, either, with 36 people in Obama's executive office of nearly 1,800 workers — about 2 percent — owing the government $833,970 in back taxes.

Obama used part of his State of the Union address Tuesday night to promote economic fairness, arguing for changes in the tax code that would create a minimum tax rate of at least 30 percent on anyone making more than $1 million. The finances of one of his chief Republican rivals, Mitt Romney, has been scrutinized because he, like many millionaires, pays a lower rate because most of his income came from investments, which are taxed at a lower rate.

The IRS report attracted the attention of Republicans, who said it undercut the president's argument on taxes. "If Obama wants people to pay their 'fair share,' perhaps he should start with his own staff," tweeted Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus.

White House officials noted that the delinquency rate among executive office staff had fallen from nearly 3 percent in 2008. In 2009, 41 employees in the president's executive office owed about $830,000, representing about 2.3 percent of its workforce.

White House spokeswoman Amy Brundage said the annual report was released by the IRS because there is a "high standard for government employees."

"Though the report shows that fewer executive office employees owe taxes than in the last year of the previous administration and we expect all employees to pay their taxes in full, more needs to be done to ensure compliance and the president has asked his team to work on this issue," Brundage said.

Overall, the total amount owed is down slightly from September 2009, when more than 282,000 federal workers owed $3.3 billion in taxes.

The report does not offer specific explanations for the delinquencies. Many people who owe back taxes file returns but cannot pay the full amount when their taxes are due, said IRS spokesman Anthony Burke. Others may be disputing the bill, may have filed jointly with a spouse who owes taxes or may have had their tax bills increased by an audit and cannot pay the higher amount.

The statistics on federal employees do not include those who are on payment plans. The IRS doesn't provide a comparable delinquency rate for income taxes paid by the public.

Among Cabinet agencies, the departments of Education and Housing and Urban Development had the highest delinquency rates, at nearly 4 percent. The Treasury Department had the lowest delinquency rate, at nearly 1 percent.
 
Yeah!

Toss Grandma out on the street!
Fail to provide decent education for our young!
Make people pay for fire protection!



:rolleyes:



Republicans have no morals.
 
how many friends of obama don't file taxes? sad really, pro obama people are really mentally challenged and deformed



That's really the bottom line isn't it? No one was calling for higher taxes until the Democrats increased spending dramatically. That's the bottom line, isn't it?

Of course, they should concentrate on collecting the taxes they already owe first.

Thousands of federal workers owe back taxes
By KEN THOMAS | Associated Press – 22 hours ago.. .

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama has preached that all Americans should pay their fair share in taxes, but a government report finds that tens of thousands of federal employees — from staffers in Congress to federal agencies and even Obama's executive office — collectively owe the government billions in back taxes.

Data from the Internal Revenue Service found that more than 279,000 federal employees and retirees owed $3.4 billion in back income taxes as of Sept. 30, 2010.

The data showed that 467 employees of the House of Representatives, or about 4.2 percent of the workforce, owed more than $8.5 million. In the Senate, 217 employees, or about 3 percent of the workforce, owed $2.13 million.

Obama's staff was not immune, either, with 36 people in Obama's executive office of nearly 1,800 workers — about 2 percent — owing the government $833,970 in back taxes.

Obama used part of his State of the Union address Tuesday night to promote economic fairness, arguing for changes in the tax code that would create a minimum tax rate of at least 30 percent on anyone making more than $1 million. The finances of one of his chief Republican rivals, Mitt Romney, has been scrutinized because he, like many millionaires, pays a lower rate because most of his income came from investments, which are taxed at a lower rate.

The IRS report attracted the attention of Republicans, who said it undercut the president's argument on taxes. "If Obama wants people to pay their 'fair share,' perhaps he should start with his own staff," tweeted Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus.

White House officials noted that the delinquency rate among executive office staff had fallen from nearly 3 percent in 2008. In 2009, 41 employees in the president's executive office owed about $830,000, representing about 2.3 percent of its workforce.

White House spokeswoman Amy Brundage said the annual report was released by the IRS because there is a "high standard for government employees."

"Though the report shows that fewer executive office employees owe taxes than in the last year of the previous administration and we expect all employees to pay their taxes in full, more needs to be done to ensure compliance and the president has asked his team to work on this issue," Brundage said.

Overall, the total amount owed is down slightly from September 2009, when more than 282,000 federal workers owed $3.3 billion in taxes.

The report does not offer specific explanations for the delinquencies. Many people who owe back taxes file returns but cannot pay the full amount when their taxes are due, said IRS spokesman Anthony Burke. Others may be disputing the bill, may have filed jointly with a spouse who owes taxes or may have had their tax bills increased by an audit and cannot pay the higher amount.

The statistics on federal employees do not include those who are on payment plans. The IRS doesn't provide a comparable delinquency rate for income taxes paid by the public.

Among Cabinet agencies, the departments of Education and Housing and Urban Development had the highest delinquency rates, at nearly 4 percent. The Treasury Department had the lowest delinquency rate, at nearly 1 percent.
 
how much crust is growing on your tighty whities? maybe time to change them as the skid marks are obstructing your view?


Yeah!

Toss Grandma out on the street!
Fail to provide decent education for our young!
Make people pay for fire protection!



:rolleyes:



Republicans have no morals.
 
Yeah!

Toss Grandma out on the street!
Fail to provide decent education for our young!
Make people pay for fire protection!

:rolleyes:

Republicans have no morals.

We weren't throwing grandma out in the street or not providing fire protection or education before Obama came to power at the existing rates of taxation.

What has changed now that Obama is President that we can't accomplish those things without a tax increase? It is the need to pay for Solyndra and the $22B of "investment" in new energy programs that have gone to Democrat campaign supporters without anything of value being produced? Is it the need for democrat elites to "get their share?"
 
We weren't throwing grandma out in the street or not providing fire protection or education before Obama came to power at the existing rates of taxation.

The Bush tax cuts are what flipped the table. Obama was left to clean up Bush's wars and economic mess.

We can fix this. Raise taxes.

Take care of Grandma. Educate the masses. Stop house fires.
 
The Bush tax cuts are what flipped the table. Obama was left to clean up Bush's wars and economic mess.

We can fix this. Raise taxes.

Take care of Grandma. Educate the masses. Stop house fires.

We didn't have any of those problems during the 10 years where we enjoyed the benefits of the Bush Tax cuts and got down to 4.6% unemployment and brought the last budget deficit down to $172B before democrats got elected to run the Senate and House.

Is it that Democrats can't run things effectively and are looking for a "bailout" by the hardworking citizens of the United States?
 
We didn't have any of those problems during the 10 years where we enjoyed the benefits of the Bush Tax cuts and got down to 4.6% unemployment and brought the last budget deficit down to $172B before democrats got elected to run the Senate and House.

Is it that Democrats can't run things effectively and are looking for a "bailout" by the hardworking citizens of the United States?

Lol
are you seriously saying that the the 8 years bush was in office were good years for the economy and none of his policies have anything to do with the mess we are in now?

Life was rainbows and gumdrops until Obama stepped into office?
 
Lol
are you seriously saying that the the 8 years bush was in office were good years for the economy and none of his policies have anything to do with the mess we are in now?

Life was rainbows and gumdrops until Obama stepped into office?

4.6% unemployment would look pretty good right now wouldn't it?

The real estate crash was a long time coming and mostly the result of lax lending rules pushed by the democrats (in the name of "fairness" and policial expediency). Bush and the Republicans weren't aggressive enough about reversing those rules so they bear a little responsibility, but Bush did publically try to reverse them (it's documented) but was met with loud cries of "racist" for his troubles.

Life wasn't rainbows and gumdrops. There were serious problems to deal with, but, again, 4.6% unemployment vs. 9-10% unemployment indicates a serious deterioration of our economic well-being.
 
4.6% unemployment would look pretty good right now wouldn't it?

The real estate crash was a long time coming and mostly the result of lax lending rules pushed by the democrats (in the name of "fairness" and policial expediency). Bush and the Republicans weren't aggressive enough about reversing those rules so they bear a little responsibility, but Bush did publically try to reverse them (it's documented) but was met with loud cries of "racist" for his troubles.

Life wasn't rainbows and gumdrops. There were serious problems to deal with, but, again, 4.6% unemployment vs. 9-10% unemployment indicates a serious deterioration of our economic well-being.

Not really. The 4.6% unemployment (which was long gone by the time Bush left office anyway) still wouldn't solve the underlying problems we're having.

The Real Estate crash was not a long time coming, it was a very short time coming and Clinton and the Republicans were directly responsible for it. Bush made no real attempt either vocally nor legislative to try to reverse the policy.
 
The Bush tax cuts are what flipped the table. Obama was left to clean up Bush's wars and economic mess.

We can fix this. Raise taxes.

Take care of Grandma. Educate the masses. Stop house fires.

please more taxes = more wasteful spending

end the madness, just say no!

no more borrowing
no more obama defecate budgets
 
1. We gave the government trillions of dollars.
2. They SPENT > the amount we gave.
3. You propose that we give them MORE $$$ than we already do.
4. Somehow we are supposed to believe that this will lead to decreased spending and reducing the deficit.


hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Mr. Spock would not approve of that reasoning.
 
Not really. The 4.6% unemployment (which was long gone by the time Bush left office anyway) still wouldn't solve the underlying problems we're having.

The Real Estate crash was not a long time coming, it was a very short time coming and Clinton and the Republicans were directly responsible for it. Bush made no real attempt either vocally nor legislative to try to reverse the policy.

omg, Sean you posting something negative or semi negative about Clinton.

what is this world coming to? is the sky raining fire?
 
Yeah!

Toss Grandma out on the street!
Fail to provide decent education for our young!
Make people pay for fire protection!



:rolleyes:



Republicans have no morals.

everyone pays for fire protection... its called taxes. those communities the vote not to include a money for the fire department pay a fee. seems pretty reasonable. why do people expect to get something for nothing. how do these small fire departments get new trucks and equipment with out an income. they can't put out a fire at your house with out fuel in the truck.....
 
omg, Sean you posting something negative or semi negative about Clinton.

what is this world coming to? is the sky raining fire?

I post plenty negative about Clinton, Obama and Democrats in general. I know who causes problems and I blame them. It doesn't matter what party they are in.

It just so happens that Republicans have over the last forty or so years caused more problems than not.
 
everyone pays for fire protection... its called taxes. those communities the vote not to include a money for the fire department pay a fee. seems pretty reasonable. why do people expect to get something for nothing. how do these small fire departments get new trucks and equipment with out an income. they can't put out a fire at your house with out fuel in the truck.....

but "recession" is something government people do not understand. hence, many fire depts are not knee deep in fat aka tax payer money like they use to be as property values have come down.

so government addicts are trying hard, to find new sources for crack
 
Back
Top