Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There should be an "it doesn't matter, it's on ignore" option.
You may want to take him off.
He's losing it lately.
This gets old fast for me. There's more evidence that Karen is what she says she is than almost any other poster on Lit.
Please post pictures of this so called woman.
I have never seen any evidence that it is what it says it is.
This gets old fast for me. There's more evidence that Karen is what she says she is than almost any other poster on Lit.
She's posted videos of herself. They're out there for the searching.
Not to mention Laurel actually had to check into it when people got really weird and insisted she was a 12 year-old boy.
She wasn't.She's exactly who she says she is.
This gets old fast for me. There's more evidence that Karen is what she says she is than almost any other poster on Lit.
She's posted videos of herself. They're out there for the searching.
She's a 44 year old fat bald dude.
You'll see.
I've not seen the vid. However I've also not heard about anyone here actually meeting KK. THAT would be the nail in the coffin on this "debate". Otherwise rule 30...
I agree with this, in fact. As I said, there's lots of evidence. I would never claim there was proof.
But I think the larger question is interesting; I could post a video of Karen sitting on my lap with naked tits, twat, and no cock holding today's New York Times in front of my laptop logged into my Perg account, and people could still legitimately claim that's not the person who posts as Karen. In the end, there's no actual way to prove it. I could post video of the same person in the act of logging in as Karen and someone would say it's a shared account. It's like proving the existence of ghosts that way.
You're a reasonable guy; what would be "proof" in your opinion? Just my testimony that I've met her?
This again???????
Did she mention Literotica ?
That was hypothetical.
I've not seen the vid...
I have only heard of videos posted by Karen Kraft.
I was just assuming you had seen the video.
If I saw the video you described I would believe she was a she.
This is a photo she has used in the past.
![]()
I agree with this, in fact. As I said, there's lots of evidence. I would never claim there was proof.
But I think the larger question is interesting; I could post a video of Karen sitting on my lap with naked tits, twat, and no cock holding today's New York Times in front of my laptop logged into my Perg account, and people could still legitimately claim that's not the person who posts as Karen. In the end, there's no actual way to prove it. I could post video of the same person in the act of logging in as Karen and someone would say it's a shared account. It's like proving the existence of ghosts that way.
You're a reasonable guy; what would be "proof" in your opinion? Just my testimony that I've met her?
This is the same person in the video.
So you saw the the video too?
When was it posted?
I would like to see it.
It's posted on another site. I'm sure if you ask her, she'll give you a link.
Oh. I have seen both videos. Same person as in that picture. Search her posts and you'll find it, I'm sure.I have only heard of videos posted by Karen Kraft.
I was just assuming you had seen the video.
If I saw the video you described I would believe she was a she.
This is a photo she has used in the past.
![]()
I am not a reasonable guy I'll have you know. I just play one online.
Yeah, just your testimony would be good enough for me. I suppose if anyone was to vouch for KK it would have to be a trusted poster like Colonel Hogan or pointless or Beco (kidding) meeting "her".
I get how its a double standard because there are lots of posters that never get called out and there's no evidence that they're whom they say they are. Oh well.