While You Were Watching Iowa, Obama Was Springing Taliban Terrorists from Gitmo

I like you, Eyer. I even usually like your politics. I know you don't give a shit....but....I fucking hate it when you cut and paste huge chunks of text instead of a link.

Ok. Sorry. I'm leaving now.

Done...
 
If the treatment of inmates at Guantanamo is acceptable, why is it illegal to treat criminal suspects and prisoners that way? Why does the Geneva Convention exist? Why is the US a signatory to the UN protocol on the treatment of child soldiers? Why did a special judicial system have to be created for Guantanamo prisoners?

Idk...I think those laws are PC bull shit written by a bunch of mother fuckers who don't have a clue in the first place (notice all the winning we have done since those laws/treaties came to be?). Bottom line is the objective of any war is to exterminate all hostile enemy/force unconditional surrender and either gtfo or seize assets and pay your tab with them. Anything less is failure.
 
No, it's not bullshit. If you exposed yourself to something other than religious pro-life publications and right wing blogs you would know that.

Yeah...

...you are nothing but bullsh!t.

"religion" and "right-wing" crap sucks as much as your amateur deflection does...

...and I've read more variety than you have breathed air.

I believe in respecting international law with regards to torture and child soldiers. I support unrestricted access to abortion. And I like dead baby jokes.

Deal with it.

I am, killer:

You enjoy dead baby jokes and you support unrestricted killing of human life...

...which explains why you support a young man who intentionally kills, and why you are so offended that the entire world doesn't see him as a victim like your corrupted eyes do.

That you hold innocent life at no value, but champion the guilty...

...says everything about the enemy of truth you are.
 
NO FUCKING SHIT.....so what is the problem with a woman going to get the lil parasite shop vac'ed or chem bombed out? She has to live with it...and honestly I could care less where my pot goes, I sell it to a legal dispensary so it's their problem not mine. My choice, I sleep well at night.

As for the collective stuff...deny it all you want but human reproduction is exponential and earths natural resources are finite...they will collide and mankind will fucking lose. I prefer to recognize the issue and support appropriate action, if you want to stick your head in the sand that's your business.

Some dork - it was probably one of those mentally-challenged triplets, King0 or Wrong Element or Sgt Spiderman - stated the other day that liberty is dependent on the amount of laws in effect...

...without even realizing what an absurd contradiction that is.

You're doing exactly the same above:

Masquerading as somehow caring about the future of human life on earth...

...while championing the killing of the most innocent of human life today.

Honesty's in the mirror, grunt...
 
I was going to disagree...

...but then I noticed...

...you doubled-spaced.

Single-spacing is for statists and fems, amiright?
 
Yeah...

...you are nothing but bullsh!t.

"religion" and "right-wing" crap sucks as much as your amateur deflection does...

...and I've read more variety than you have breathed air.



I am, killer:

You enjoy dead baby jokes and you support unrestricted killing of human life...

...which explains why you support a young man who intentionally kills, and why you are so offended that the entire world doesn't see him as a victim like your corrupted eyes do.

That you hold innocent life at no value, but champion the guilty...

...says everything about the enemy of truth you are.

Oh brother.

All I'm going to say is, if you think the assertion that prisoners should not be tortured is the same as championing the guilty, then you yourself might be better suited to life in countries such as Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have some satanic rituals to conduct.
 
You're doing exactly the same above:

Masquerading as somehow caring about the future of human life on earth...

...while championing the killing of the most innocent of human life today.

Honesty's in the mirror, grunt...

Well for starters I couldn't give a shit about the future of human life on earth past my existence, I just want to make sure I have enough to live out my life...fuck everyone else. At the rate we are going it will be within my life time that the earth will not be able to support the whole of humanity....so yea I worry.

Sounds like you are in favor of forcing women who want (and will) get an abortion into a dangerous black market. No abortions would also be ensuring millions of unwanted, abused and neglected children running like dogs in the streets. Just fuck and breed as much as you can....who cares about the consequences right?

As for the most innocent of human LIFE...define life. Is it the moment of conception? when the fetus shows signs of basic neurological activity? when it can live on it's own without mom? I mean after all until it can live on it's own it would be called a parasite if it didn't share mom's DNA.

Bottom line is what a woman dose with her uterus or whatever is in it is her business and no one else's. She has to live with what she has done...not you...not me...not anyone else. Didn't you once say you were a libertarian?
 
His father, now deceased, was an Al Qaeda financier.

.

I'd like to think that most Canadians and Americans do not want to live a society where torturing disabled minors is acceptable.

I'd lik eto think MOST of us would rather live is a SOCIETY where we PROTECT our OWN from getting KILLED

and

FUCK THE TERRORISTS


I know there are those that LOVE the TERRORISTS and HATE OUR SIDE

FUCK THAT SIDE
 
If the treatment of inmates at Guantanamo is acceptable, why is it illegal to treat criminal suspects and prisoners that way? Why does the Geneva Convention exist? Why is the US a signatory to the UN protocol on the treatment of child soldiers? Why did a special judicial system have to be created for Guantanamo prisoners?


.

Deal with it.

first, teh GC is PC BULLSHIT

No one adheres to it except some in teh WEST, our enemies always used it against us

PLUS

It was signed with ARMIES OF CUNTRIES in mind, not Islamic terrorists who USE KIDS as TERRORISTS and MULES


So grow the fuck up and realize YOU ARE ON TEH FRONT LINES AS WELL

Show compassion to yourself, NOT your killers
 
Meet the Taliban leader Obama wants to release from Guantanamo

By Marc Thiessen
January 4, 2012, 2:36 pm
A A A


As Michael notes, the Obama administration wants to open peace talks with the Taliban and reward them before they even come to the table by releasing senior Taliban leaders held at Guantanamo Bay. Fox News reports that a senior U.S. official has confirmed that “Mullah Mohammed Fazl is among the prisoners being considered for release.”

So who is this Mullah Mohammed Fazl?

Last year, WikiLeaks released a trove of documents it dubbed the “Gitmo Files” with assessments of hundreds of Guantanamo detainees—including Fazl. According to his official record, Fazl is a war criminal who has massacred thousands of people, has close relationships with al Qaeda and other terrorist groups, is involved in narcotics trafficking, and is so senior in the Taliban hierarchy that he once threatened the Taliban’s supreme leader, Mullah Omar. He is considered to pose a “high risk” to American forces and our allies if released.

Here is the official U.S. government assessment of the man Barack Obama wants to put back on the streets (emphasis is mine):


Detainee is assessed to be a HIGH risk, as he is likely to pose a threat to the US, its interests, and allies…. Detainee is an admitted senior official of the Taliban government and army and was last assigned to the position of Deputy Minister of Defense. Detainee also served as Chief of Staff of the Taliban Army and a commander of the 22nd Division. Detainee is wanted by the UN for possible war crimes including the murder of thousands of Shiites. Detainee had operational associations with significant al-Qaida and other extremist personnel. Detainee wielded considerable influence throughout the northern region of Afghanistan and his influence continued even after his capture. If released, detainee would likely rejoin the Taliban and establish ties with anti-Coalition militias (ACM) participating in hostilities against US and Coalition forces in Afghanistan….

Detainee is wanted by the UN for possible war crimes while serving as a Taliban Army Chief of Staff and was noted having a long record of human rights abuses. Detainee was implicated in the murder of thousands of Shiites in northern Afghanistan during the Taliban reign. When asked about the murders, detainee and [ANOTHER DETAINEE] did not express any regret and stated they did what they needed to do in their struggle to establish their ideal state.

Detainee protected a subordinate accused of mass murder. Detainee’s deputy commander, Mullah Dadullah Lang, aka (Commander Dadullah), was reportedly responsible for the murder of 500 Shia, Hazara, and Uzbek civilians, including men, women, and children, during the winter of 2000. Dadullah Lang’s troops seized the people near Sar-i-Pol, AF, trucked them to Baghlan Province, AF, killed them, and threw the bodies into gorges…. After Mullah Omar found out about the massacre, he ordered Dadullah Lang to be disarmed and brought to Kandahar to explain his actions. Detainee vouched for Dadullah Lang, reportedly telling Supreme Leader of the Taliban Mullah Muhammad Omar that if Dadullah Lang was disarmed, detainee would disarm Mullah Omar. (Analyst Note: Detainee was directly subordinate to Mullah Omar. Detainee’s threat directly against the Supreme Leader of the Taliban indicates he held great authority and power within the Taliban)….

Detainee was reportedly involved in Taliban narcotics trafficking activities….

[Another detainee] stated detainee has continued to spread anti-Afghan government and anti-US messages among detainees at JTF-GTMO [and] lists detainee among several detainees at JTF-GTMO who would likely pose a threat to the Afghan government it released….

Detainee was directly connected to several extremist organizations and facilitated programs supporting the Taliban, including al-Qaida and IMU…. Detainee has specific information relating to several extremist organizations that provide support to the Taliban. Detainee also probably has significant information on Taliban and al-Qaida personnel still active today.

This is the man the Obama administration wants to release—not in return for any concession on the part of the Taliban, mind you, but as a confidence building measure before any talks even begin. Based on this assessment, Mullah Mohammed Fazl is a mass murderer who should not be released under any circumstances. He should be tried by military commission and spend the rest of his life in custody at Guantanamo Bay.
 
Now that some bleeding heart has managed to pretend WE are the problem, lets get back to what the thread is about



Obama and his terror supporting allies wish to release a hardened TERRORIST/KILLER

In return for the TALIBAN opening an OFFICE

Does THAT make sense to anyone?

Really?

REALLY?


Our pal will STOP killing?

The OFFICE will promote PEACE?

REALLY?????

WHERE IS OUR POW?:rolleyes:
 
Oh brother.

All I'm going to say is, if you think the assertion that prisoners should not be tortured is the same as championing the guilty, then you yourself might be better suited to life in countries such as Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have some satanic rituals to conduct.

Listen up

The problem is NOT US

The problem is THEM

That you and so many DONT (yet) see it

Will result in many of

US

dying.

Normal people will then see we are in a fight for our lives, but my guess is that ABNORMAL "PEOPLE" will still not see it.



To truly equate the West of "torturing" terrorists and saying we are teh SAME as Afghanistan and SA etc marks you an ABNORMAL "person", I am certain you wont understand!
 
Lets say that you're correct- is it okay to torture enemies of the state? You would be fine with torturing a 10 year old?

yes

it is OK

to protect MASS NUMBERS of our citizens

ITS OK!


The question ISNT why do we "tirture" 10 yr olds

THE QUESTION IS

WHY DO MUSLIMS USE 10 YR OLDS AS TERRORISTS????????????



PS, are you also pretending to be UNAWARE that they use BABIES in BABY CARRIAGES TO TRANSPORT IEDS?????????????


:cool:
 
Hey busybody....

Although I think you're a bit unstable, I like you and your politics. I also really like your car.

I know it's your thread and all, but....I really hate it when you post huge chunks of text instead of a link, because I'm usually here on my phone and it fucks everything up when you do that.

I

don't

even

care

if

you

talk

like

this....

I just really hate the wall of text. Not that you care and stuff....just tossing that out there.
 
Hey busybody....

Although I think you're a bit unstable, I like you and your politics. I also really like your car.

I know it's your thread and all, but....I really hate it when you post huge chunks of text instead of a link, because I'm usually here on my phone and it fucks everything up when you do that.

I

don't

even

care

if

you

talk

like

this....

I just really hate the wall of text. Not that you care and stuff....just tossing that out there.

OK....Long C n PEE siad, the GITMO guy is BAD TERRORIST and NIGGER wants him out to kill us


Better?

Oh

and you are on phone and have problem reading my LONG

SEE n PEES?

You outa get

a

bigger phone

like I have

http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/stlog/BigNokiaCellPhone(1).jpg
 
how can any SANE REASONABLE person believe

this will lead to anything

GOOD?


I mean GOOD for America:rolleyes:
 
Well for starters I couldn't give a shit about the future of human life on earth past my existence, I just want to make sure I have enough to live out my life...fuck everyone else.

Standard MO for a drug dealer...

At the rate we are going it will be within my life time that the earth will not be able to support the whole of humanity....

Absolute proof that pot makes one stupid...

Sounds like you are in favor of forcing women who want (and will) get an abortion into a dangerous black market. No abortions would also be ensuring millions of unwanted, abused and neglected children running like dogs in the streets. Just fuck and breed as much as you can....who cares about the consequences right?

...ditto.

As for the most innocent of human LIFE...define life.

It's very simple as far as that goes...

...in human existence there're only 2 conditions: life or death. The presence of either excludes the presence of the other. A human is either dead or alive.

Trying working with that mind-blowing theory...

Bottom line is what a woman dose with her uterus or whatever is in it is her business and no one else's. She has to live with what she has done...not you...not me...not anyone else.

The only problem with that is the same problem you present with your drug dealing: the woman dismisses the value of another human life just as you don't give a fuck if your drugs end up in minor's minds.

Enemies of individual liberty all share in common the devaluation of another's life...

Didn't you once say you were a libertarian?

No...

...I've never said - or posted - that I'm a libertarian.

Didn't you once post you served in the United States Army?
 
...I've never said - or posted - that I'm a libertarian.

I am....but I'm not sure why he'd confuse the two of us :confused:

(Just to preempt the wasted-vote-cuz-it's-a-two-party-system speech.....I vote republican.)
 
Back
Top