pete
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2007
- Posts
- 10,169
The average Bush tax cut for the 1% this year ($66,384) will be greater than the average income of the other 99% ($58,506)
“The super committee failed to grapple with the extraordinarily costly Bush tax cuts for the richest—tax policies that, according to the Congressional Budget Office, cost more in added federal debt than they add in additional economic activity,” explained Jo Comerford, NPP’s Executive Director. Frank Knapp, vice chairman of the American Sustainable Business Council, added in a statement yesterday, “the high-end Bush tax cuts are a big part of the problem – not the solution…It’s obscene to keep slashing infrastructure and services for everybody on Main Street to keep up tax giveaways for millionaires and multinational corporations.”
The Bush tax cuts have done nothing expand the federal debt and give billions in tax breaks to those who needed them least. Past grand bargains when it came to the budget included substantial new revenues, to balance the pain of getting the country’s budget in order. Instead of adopting that approach, the GOP wants to continue lavishing tax breaks onto the 1%, while asking everyone else to sacrifice.
this is hopeless thinking
tax cuts for anyone, 1% or otherwise, don't truly *cost* the government. it's simply revenue that they're not getting in the first place. but of course the way government accounting works, things like "savings" and "revenue" are only made-up words whose definitions are fluid, and altered to suit the agenda du jour.
the bush tax cuts are NOT the problem, not by a long shot. look at it this way: let's say the gov't did actually remove those cuts, let's hypothesize that they even added new taxes on the wealthy. well so what? having money has never been the government's problem. it's not like they'd suddenly have all the answers and be able to fix all the problems if only they had another $100B, or another $500B to spend. the sheet mass of money obama's administration has spent would be enough to sink the entire russian fleet, and where do we stand? 9% unemployment, and stagnant growth.
the u.s. lost our credit rating not because of how much money we had, and not because of who we taxed and who got tax breaks. we lost our triple-A rating because of our spending policies, and given the chance that's what obama would continue to do (when he's not golfing, that is)