What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?

[Ulaven_Demorte]

In fact, FUCKTARD, you might want to search on "Firespin" and see why he's no longer here as I daily forced him to defend the idea that electing someone with an "R" behind their name was more important than having a Democrat in their place even if that "R" was a big government "moderate" Statist who believed in "Republican" Intervention because they were smarter since they didn't frighten the poor hapless Democrats the way "radical" Austrian (Obamanation: it's not a language...) Libertarians do...

"The more communal enterprise extends, the more attention is drawn to the bad business results of nationalized and municipalized undertakings. It is impossible to miss the cause of the difficulty: a child could see where something was lacking. So that it cannot be said that this problem has not been tackled. But the way in which it has been tackled has been deplorably inadequate. Its organic connection with the essential nature of socialist enterprise has been regarded as merely a question of better selection of persons. It has not been realized that even exceptionally gifted men of high character cannot solve the problems created by socialist control of industry."
Ludwig Heinrich Elder von Mises


__________________

You're starting to sound frantic Cap'n. Now you're trying to credit yourself with "running someone off of lit" ala pornstarwannabe and dropping neverendingme's "Fucktard" every chance you get...

You're getting more pathetic by the day. I wasn't sure that was even possible.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

You're starting to sound frantic Cap'n. Now you're trying to credit yourself with "running someone off of lit" ala pornstarwannabe and dropping neverendingme's "Fucktard" every chance you get...

You're getting more pathetic by the day. I wasn't sure that was even possible.

Jesus, drink more obama juice will you

some times we have to bitch slap people like you back into reality. a collective "state" system doesn't work, hence this is why the obama is a failure

 

[NeverEndingMe]

I'm not sure you can take credit for anyone leaving GB. as you have to remember that the socialist wing and democrats are so god awful ignorant that one gets to a point where they give up


there is only so much you can do for these kinds of people (by that I mean supporters of the 0bama - and like some great person said its a zero - bama as the obama stands for zero growth, zero ideas, and zero hope).

yes we can - sit on our ass or play golf

In fact, FUCKTARD, you might want to search on "Firespin" and see why he's no longer here as I daily forced him to defend the idea that electing someone with an "R" behind their name was more important than having a Democrat in their place even if that "R" was a big government "moderate" Statist who believed in "Republican" Intervention because they were smarter since they didn't frighten the poor hapless Democrats the way "radical" Austrian (Obamanation: it's not a language...) Libertarians do...

"The more communal enterprise extends, the more attention is drawn to the bad business results of nationalized and municipalized undertakings. It is impossible to miss the cause of the difficulty: a child could see where something was lacking. So that it cannot be said that this problem has not been tackled. But the way in which it has been tackled has been deplorably inadequate. Its organic connection with the essential nature of socialist enterprise has been regarded as merely a question of better selection of persons. It has not been realized that even exceptionally gifted men of high character cannot solve the problems created by socialist control of industry."
Ludwig Heinrich Elder von Mises


__________________

 

[koalabear]

You're starting to sound frantic Cap'n. Now you're trying to credit yourself with "running someone off of lit" ala pornstarwannabe and dropping neverendingme's "Fucktard" every chance you get...

You're getting more pathetic by the day. I wasn't sure that was even possible.

Seek counseling.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

Seek counseling.

we have to give him/them some wiggle room. after all, the obama is such a failure its hard to still believe

 

[koalabear]

we have to give him/them some wiggle room. after all, the obama is such a failure its hard to still believe

You give him wiggle room he just eats more twinkies.

 

[koalabear]

Stocks waver as Trichet issues warning on Europe
The European Central Bank president warns of increased uncertainty in the region. The Bank of England expands its bond-buying program. Shares of Apple rise follow the passing of Steve Jobs. Jobless claims increase.


Updated: 10/06/2011 11:29 ET
DOW 10,994.06 +54.11
NASDAQ 2,482.48 +21.97
S&P 1,152.50 +8.47

 

[Sean Renaud]

Stocks waver as Trichet issues warning on Europe
The European Central Bank president warns of increased uncertainty in the region. The Bank of England expands its bond-buying program. Shares of Apple rise follow the passing of Steve Jobs. Jobless claims increase.


Updated: 10/06/2011 11:29 ET
DOW 10,994.06 +54.11
NASDAQ 2,482.48 +21.97
S&P 1,152.50 +8.47

Wait. . . mild gains count as stocks wavering?

MORON

 

[koalabear]

Wait. . . mild gains count as stocks wavering?

MORON

Stop proving how stupid you are, Idiot.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Stop proving how stupid you are, Idiot.

I can't even pretend to be stupid with you making me look brilliant.

MORON

 

[koalabear]

I can't even pretend to be stupid with you making me look brilliant.

MORON

You obviously can pretend.

 

[koalabear]

Stocks rise as Europe boosts banks

Updated: 10/06/2011 12:37 ET
DOW 11,044.88 +104.93
NASDAQ 2,496.06 +35.55
S&P 1,157.50 +13.47

 

[koalabear]

Stocks rise as Europe boosts banks......

Updated: 10/06/2011 01:39 ET
DOW 11,012.38 +72.43
NASDAQ 2,481.41 +20.90
S&P 1,153.10 +9.07

 

[NeverEndingMe]

Updated: 10/06/2011 01:39 ET
DOW 11,012.38 +72.43
NASDAQ 2,481.41 +20.90
S&P 1,153.10 +9.07

does Germany have anough money to fix the lazy fucktards from Greece, France, and the ignorant UK rioters?

 

[koalabear]

does Germany have anough money to fix the lazy fucktards from Greece, France, and the ignorant UK rioters?

Bailouts always work.

 

[unregistered]

 

[mercury14]

Go ahead, attack the source:



Obama Has Now Increased Debt More than All Presidents from George Washington Through George H.W. Bush Combined
By Terence P. Jeffrey

(CNSNews.com)

Maybe if you don't count the cost of Bush's unfunded wars, Medicare Part-D, and the Bush Tax cuts. That's about $6.7 trillion of policies Republicans didn't think they should pay for.

The total cost of those three policies is almost half of the entire national debt.

 

[koalabear]

Maybe if you don't count the cost of Bush's unfunded wars, Medicare Part-D, and the Bush Tax cuts. That's about $6.7 trillion of policies Republicans didn't think they should pay for.

The total cost of those three policies is almost half of the entire national debt.

Go eat a twinkie, MORON.

 

[koalabear]

Retail sales give stocks a boost

Updated: 10/06/2011 04:36 ET
DOW 11,123.33 +183.38
NASDAQ 2,506.82 +46.31
S&P 1,164.97 +20.94

Government Motors still well below the IPO at 22.35

 

[Sean Renaud]

No need to attack the source. It's better to attack the blatant lie.

Go ahead, attack the source:



Obama Has Now Increased Debt More than All Presidents from George Washington Through George H.W. Bush Combined
By Terence P. Jeffrey

(CNSNews.com) - The Obama administration passed another fiscal milestone this week, according to new data released by the Treasury Department. As of the close of business on Oct. 3, the total national debt was $14,837,099,271,196.71—up about $44.8 billion from Sept. 30.

That means that in the less-than-three-years Obama has been in office, the federal debt has increased by $4.212 trillion--more than the total national debt of about $4.1672 trillion accumulated by all 41 U.S. presidents from George Washington through George H.W. Bush combined.

This $4.212-trillion increase in the national debt means that during Obama’s term the federal government has already borrowed about an additional $35,835 for every American household--or $44,980 for every full-time private-sector worker. (According to the Census Bureau there were about 117,538,000 households in the country in 2010, and, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were about 93,641,000 full-time private-sector workers.)

When Obama was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2009, according to the Treasury Department, the total national debt stood at $10,626,877,048,913.08.

Right here I could stop. When he took office the debt was at 10,626,877.08 per YOUR article. While that's not the total debt accrued (that number would be at least double that) that's an easy starting point. Again from your article the current national debt is 14,837,099,271,196.71. So there's been an increase of about 4,200,000. Now look at the numbers. Is 4,200,000>10,000,00? If not you should stop there. Hell it's just slightly higher than what George H.W. Bush left behind total.

At the end of January 1993, the month that President George H. W. Bush left office, the total national debt was $4.1672 trillion, according to the Treasury. Thus, the total national debt accumulated by the first 41 presidents combined was about $44.8 billion less than the approximately $4.212 trillion in new debt added during Obama’s term.

It's important to note that the 4.1 trillion Bush I left is not the total national debt accumulated by the first 41 presidents. It's more accurately stated as the debt that Ronald Reagan and George Bush created. Until then the national debt had been in steady decline.

As of Monday, Obama had been in office 986 days—or about 32 and a half months. During that time, the debt increased at an average pace of $4.27 billion per day. Were that rate to continue until Obama’s term ends on Jan. 20, 2013, the debt would then stand at about $16.86534 trillion—an increase of more than $6.2 trillion for Obama’s four years.

While that's horrible it's neither expected to continue at that rate and even if it did it's worth noting he tried to raise taxes to combat part of this and that's roughly what Bush II raised the debt ceiling and nobody really complained.

That would equal nearly $53,000 for each American household or more than $66,00 for each full-time private-sector worker.

That total national debt did not exceed $6.2 trillion until 2002, when George W. Bush was president.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/oba...residents-george-washington-through-george-hw

It's funny. The average American has very little to do with this debt so breaking it up that way doesn't really make a lot of sense, not to mention nobody is talking about eliminating the debt in a year or even a decade. C'mon we little folk pay for houses over THREE DECADES. That is the amount of time the average home buyer is in debt. You don't cry about it personally why do you cry about it here?

 

[koalabear]

No need to attack the source. It's better to attack the blatant lie.



Right here I could stop. When he took office the debt was at 10,626,877.08 per YOUR article. While that's not the total debt accrued (that number would be at least double that) that's an easy starting point. Again from your article the current national debt is 14,837,099,271,196.71. So there's been an increase of about 4,200,000. Now look at the numbers. Is 4,200,000>10,000,00? If not you should stop there. Hell it's just slightly higher than what George H.W. Bush left behind total.



It's important to note that the 4.1 trillion Bush I left is not the total national debt accumulated by the first 41 presidents. It's more accurately stated as the debt that Ronald Reagan and George Bush created. Until then the national debt had been in steady decline.



While that's horrible it's neither expected to continue at that rate and even if it did it's worth noting he tried to raise taxes to combat part of this and that's roughly what Bush II raised the debt ceiling and nobody really complained.



It's funny. The average American has very little to do with this debt so breaking it up that way doesn't really make a lot of sense, not to mention nobody is talking about eliminating the debt in a year or even a decade. C'mon we little folk pay for houses over THREE DECADES. That is the amount of time the average home buyer is in debt. You don't cry about it personally why do you cry about it here?

No links merc, MORON.

 

[unregistered]

 

[koalabear]

Are you kidding?

Twinkies for all!

 

[Sean Renaud]

No links merc, MORON.

No need for links MORON. Most of what I stated is from the original article that Vette provided. It's not my fault you can't read.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

No need for links MORON. Most of what I stated is from the original article that Vette provided. It's not my fault you can't read.

Sean, give it up. its great that you have a interweb connection but maybe you should spend some time educating yourself