jomar
chillin
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2006
- Posts
- 27,741
Sounds like she wants more of the fun.
I once met a masochist who said it was hard to find guys to be mean enough for her taste.
Upskirt.
- Thread starter Peregrinator
- Start date
Sounds like she wants more of the fun.
I once met a masochist who said it was hard to find guys to be mean enough for her taste.
W
where
Guest
has that experience impacted on subsequent experiences?
Peregrinator
Hooded On A Hill
- Joined
- May 27, 2004
- Posts
- 89,482
Has the verbing of that noun vocabularied today's youth?
W
where
Guest
KatNW1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2011
- Posts
- 690
*snarf*
Sonny Limatina
Ding dong ding
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2006
- Posts
- 21,875
That's a complicated question. I married "clean." I knew if I kept choosing women for the monkey sex, I was never going to find one sane enough to stay married to or have kids with. I was cleaning up my act for other reasons at the time anyway, and I knew I was going to want to settle down and have kids at some point soon.
Along came this beautiful, natural woman with "grown-up" priorities and her shit together and a brain, all wrapped up the body of of a sex goddess. But she also had a complicated sexual history that meant 1) pretty conservative sex, but also 2) that I would never (and will never) be approaching her body with anything even remotely suggestive of violence. I decided very early on that if the otherwise right woman came along and the sex wasn't the crazy stuff I'd been used to, I'd be OK with that, and that turned out to be the case.
It's taken a lot of years for her to feel really comfortable with her body as a sexual object. The good news is, with her at 40 and me at 45, after closing in on 10 years of marriage, two kids, etc., we're doing more fucking than most teenagers in love do. We fuck all the time, and it's gotten damned good. But it will never incorporate violence, and I'm cool with that.
Did that answer your question?
JohnnySavage
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2008
- Posts
- 44,472
Put the wife on!
W
where
Guest
Kinda. It's just that a lot of people suggest that when you get into very kinky sex of any kind, it's quite difficult to go back to 'vanilla' sex. And I have to say I hate that term. Like most things, kink is a continuum but subject to cultural norms, but the kind of sex you were describing is pretty extreme.
Super-Surprise
Loves ****
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2008
- Posts
- 74,462
Sonny Limatina
Ding dong ding
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2006
- Posts
- 21,875
W
where
Guest
so it was hard switching back?
Sonny Limatina
Ding dong ding
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2006
- Posts
- 21,875
W
where
Guest
I'm rephrasing to try and get a clearer answer.
Sonny Limatina
Ding dong ding
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2006
- Posts
- 21,875
All of the times and reasons I would occasionally like to beat my wife into silence are unrelated to sex.
But alas, I never do.
(No, it hasn't affected my marriage/sex life except in good ways. It was an amusement park ride, that's all. I was fucking other women at the time too, and didn't wish I was beating them.)
W
where
Guest
Peregrinator
Hooded On A Hill
- Joined
- May 27, 2004
- Posts
- 89,482
"Impact" was always not a verb, and I dunno, since I made that one up on the spot.
Sonny Limatina
Ding dong ding
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2006
- Posts
- 21,875
I'm all for the 'living language' argument, but "impact" as a verb always sounds ugly to me. "Affect" already means the same thing, without the trendy retronyn/corporate doublespeak.
Peregrinator
Hooded On A Hill
- Joined
- May 27, 2004
- Posts
- 89,482
Yeah, that's pretty much my take on it also. Plus, any chance to dunk Kibble's pony tails in the ink well is a good thing.
Byron In Exile
Frederick Fucking Chopin
- Joined
- May 3, 2002
- Posts
- 66,591
W
where
Guest
my dictionary begs to differ although I will concede I'm slipping into SocSci speak a bit.
Affect does almost do the same thing but Impact is more forceful and it also creates an alternative so you aren't getting too repetitive.
boys who tug my pony tail (singular, unless you mean pigtails) are clearly doing it just to provoke me into physical interation
Peregrinator
Hooded On A Hill
- Joined
- May 27, 2004
- Posts
- 89,482
my dictionary begs to differ although I will concede I'm slipping into SocSci speak a bit.
Affect does almost do the same thing but Impact is more forceful and it also creates an alternative so you aren't getting too repetitive.
boys who tug my pony tail (singular, unless you mean pigtails) are clearly doing it just to provoke me into physical interation
Your dictionary should beg to be recycled.
And at least some self-upskirt porn would be nice.
W
where
Guest
well it's been around as a verb since latin times, so I think I'll keep my current dictionary, thank you.
I don't have much upskirt porn on this machine so you'll have to make do with this...
https://flpics2.a.ssl.fastly.net/629/629688/0004ab41-aeda-8d90-2080-23cf50a17b3f_720.jpg
Peregrinator
Hooded On A Hill
- Joined
- May 27, 2004
- Posts
- 89,482
Not the way you used it.
impact (v.)
c.1600, "press closely into something," from L. impactus, pp. of impingere "to push into, dash against, thrust at" (see impinge). Originally sense preserved in impacted teeth (1876). Sense of "strike forcefully against something" first recorded 1916. Figurative sense of "have a forceful effect on" is from 1935. Related: Impacting.
Nice shot...is that you? The hair is blonde.
W
where
Guest
it's still a verb.
and yes, all the pics I post are of me unless I say otherwise. it's a wig
Peregrinator
Hooded On A Hill
- Joined
- May 27, 2004
- Posts
- 89,482
it's still a verb.
and yes, all the pics I post are of me unless I say otherwise. it's a wig
Stop squirming.
I like this shot. You have a nice way of appearing human as opposed to idealized in your pics.
