Betcha can't reload fast enough to handle this, right wingers.

Flash mobs are a black phenomenon. If LJ_Reloaded thinks they are a positive development, he should consider what the black ghetto riots from 1964 to 1968 did to the United States. They turned the United States into a Republican country.

Only a fool would want a race war, but if it comes the outcome will not even be close. Blacks should not expect Hispanics to be their ally in such a war. In the neighborhoods where they live in proximity blacks and Hispanics often hate each other.
 
Loon...

White-hater...

Covetous of the use of violence...

Now those guys [French protestors over the retirement age of 62] know how to throw down.

Riots, protests, shutting down infrastructures with strikes.

We should have taken a page out of their book during the health care reform battle...
 
Only a fool would want a race war, but if it comes the outcome will not even be close. Blacks should not expect Hispanics to be their ally in such a war. In the neighborhoods where they live in proximity blacks and Hispanics often hate each other.

He never suggested a race war. He's talking about economics and what the poor will do when they are pushed to the brink, thus his first line: "looting the economy."

What is it with some of you people and race?
 
LJ_Reloaded said:
Your ammo will run out before theirs does.



I doubt that very much.

All it takes is one well placed hole center forehead and the rest scatter like rats abandoning a sinking ship.
 
When the Republicans get done looting the economy, this is going to become common place.

Your ammo will run out before theirs does.

http://blazingcatfur.blogspot.com/2011/07/feisty-yutes-flash-mob-rob-ottawa-store.html

the economy has nothing to do with this incident and countless more like it by packs of young blacks " takin ' over ..."
it has to do with bad parenting , no fear of cops , no fear of whites standing up to them , no snitching from the hood...
it shows a complete contempt for law and society .
they ain't broke either . wearin $250 gym shoes to stroll through the aisles filling their pockets doesn't make me sympathetic.

yet you applaud it and threaten more incidents like this will become commonplace as a way of survival .
you wish .
 
Ah you're a idiot I don't believe I've told you that lately...The kids in the video most of us would call them criminals. I'm sure a liberal would call them "disfranchised youth," you know what you call gang members.
 
He never suggested a race war. He's talking about economics and what the poor will do when they are pushed to the brink, thus his first line: "looting the economy."

What is it with some of you people and race?

Between 1940 and 1960, the homicide rate remained relatively stable. In the mid-1960s, a sharp increase began that peaked in 1974 when the murder rate was double that of the late 1950s, far higher than it had been in the depths of the Depression. Between 1963 and 1973, homicides in New York City tripled. Again, property thefts and most other forms of crime followed a similar pattern.

The cause of this remarkable increase was not unemployment which, by contemporary standards, was enviably low. For example, in 1961 the unemployment rate was 6.6 percent and the crime rate was 1.9 per 1,000. By 1969, unemployment had dropped to 3.4 percent while the crime rate nearly doubled to 3.7 per 1,000. The incidence of robbery nearly tripled. Interestingly, the recession between 1980 and 1982 was accompanied by a small but clearly discernible drop in crime; as the economy revived, so did the crime rate...

Those who believe that economic deprivation causes crime must account for James Q. Wilson and Richard Herrnstein's portrait of an urban community that has suffered severe poverty but little crime. During the 1960s, San Francisco's Chinatown had the city's lowest income, highest unemployment rate and highest proportion of families with incomes under $4,000 a year. Yet in 1965, the authors note, there were only five people of Chinese ancestry committed to prison in the entire state of California.

There is a growing recognition of the embeddedness of crime in the culture of the black underclass.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_n32_v10/ai_15716060/
 
Ah you're a idiot I don't believe I've told you that lately...The kids in the video most of us would call them criminals. I'm sure a liberal would call them "disfranchised youth," you know what you call gang members.

I am a liberal on many issues. I think they are worthless, useless, and dangerous sub humans.
 
Between 1940 and 1960, the homicide rate remained relatively stable. In the mid-1960s, a sharp increase began that peaked in 1974 when the murder rate was double that of the late 1950s, far higher than it had been in the depths of the Depression. Between 1963 and 1973, homicides in New York City tripled. Again, property thefts and most other forms of crime followed a similar pattern.

The cause of this remarkable increase was not unemployment which, by contemporary standards, was enviably low. For example, in 1961 the unemployment rate was 6.6 percent and the crime rate was 1.9 per 1,000. By 1969, unemployment had dropped to 3.4 percent while the crime rate nearly doubled to 3.7 per 1,000. The incidence of robbery nearly tripled. Interestingly, the recession between 1980 and 1982 was accompanied by a small but clearly discernible drop in crime; as the economy revived, so did the crime rate...

Those who believe that economic deprivation causes crime must account for James Q. Wilson and Richard Herrnstein's portrait of an urban community that has suffered severe poverty but little crime. During the 1960s, San Francisco's Chinatown had the city's lowest income, highest unemployment rate and highest proportion of families with incomes under $4,000 a year. Yet in 1965, the authors note, there were only five people of Chinese ancestry committed to prison in the entire state of California.
All that's great but it fails to answer my post. Look at the very first sentence of my post and you'll see that I'm remarking on your interpretation of what LJR was writing.

There is a growing recognition of the embeddedness of crime in the culture of the black underclass.
Wait. UnderWHAT?

Didn't you just get done telling me this WASN'T about economics?
 
Last edited:
When the Republicans get done looting the economy, this is going to become common place.

Your ammo will run out before theirs does.

Reload, the family pet killing multi-millionaire annuity con artist who lives in a trailer park after staging his own death. God, I really can't get that image out of my head.

ROTFL
 
I forget: Was it Marie Antoinette who said that or Czar Nicholas II?

France and Russia were virtually all white. If the economy collapses poor whites are likely to identify with the white economic elite, like they have since the election of 1972.
 
France and Russia were virtually all white. If the economy collapses poor whites are likely to identify with the white economic elite, like they have since the election of 1972.

Russia has something Greece and France do not. Oil, Gas, Uranium and other natural resources. Russia however, is too corrupt to challenge China. however, I bet in 20 years China will outsource some manufacturing to Russia
 
France and Russia were virtually all white.
And thus presumably low in crime?

If the economy collapses poor whites are likely to identify with the white economic elite, like they have since the election of 1972.
Maybe. Since we've not had an economic collapse since '72, there's no telling. I'd say it depends on just how bad it gets. The bread-and-circuses of mass media have divided class unity by making politics a sport. If things get bad enough, bread-and-circuses will not suffice.
 
And thus presumably low in crime?


Maybe. Since we've not had an economic collapse since '72, there's no telling. I'd say it depends on just how bad it gets. The bread-and-circuses of mass media have divided class unity by making politics a sport. If things get bad enough, bread-and-circuses will not suffice.

things will get better if when we kick the squatter obama out of the white house.
 
And thus presumably low in crime?

Maybe. Since we've not had an economic collapse since '72, there's no telling. I'd say it depends on just how bad it gets. The bread-and-circuses of mass media have divided class unity by making politics a sport. If things get bad enough, bread-and-circuses will not suffice.

The class without property was homogeneous. That is what made the difference.

No advanced capitalist country has ever had a left wing revolution. When the German economy collapsed Hitler rose to power.

The white majority in the United States is probably too individualistic to support a totalitarian leader on the right. What is more likely is a restoration of the last quarter of the nineteenth century, or that period of time between Reconstruction and the Progressive Era. Back then the government restricted its intervention in the economy to business subsidies, tariffs, and the violent suppression of trade union activity. Blacks were subjected to second class citizenship in the South and subdued by the terrorism of the Klu Klux Klan.

BTW, you are probably thinking of the inflationary recession of 1974. In 1972 the economy was fairly good. The recession of 1974 began the stagflation that culminated in the tax revolt and the election of Ronald Reagan.
 
Last edited:
things will get better if when we kick the squatter obama out of the white house.

Republican economic policies have the certain effect of making the rich richer. When per capital gross domestic is declining, that can only be achieved by making everyone else poorer. That is what did happen when George W. Bush was president.
 
The class without property was homogeneous. That is what made the difference.
That doesn't answer my question on violence.

No advanced capitalist class has ever had a left wing revolution. When the German economy collapsed Hitler rose to power.
Sure but LJR's not talking about revolution. He's talking about a spike in crime.

The white majority in the United States is probably too individualistic to support a totalitarian leader on the right. What is more likely is a restoration of the last quarter of the nineteenth century, or that period of time between Reconstruction and the Progressive Era. Back then the government restricted its intervention in the economy to business subsidies, tariffs, and the violent suppression of trade union activity. Blacks were subjected to second class citizenship in the South and subdued by the terrorism of the Klu Klux Klan.
I'd actually be inclined to agree with this assessment although I think it has far less to do ambiguities like "individualism" and far more to do with concrete elements like media control of the message.

Also, I don't see the rise of another Klan-type organization.

BTW, you are probably thinking of the inflationary recession of 1974. In 1972 the economy was fairly good. The recession of 1974 began the stagflation that culminated in the tax revolt and the election of Ronald Reagan.
I'm not thinking of any particular economic event. My point is that we've not seen genuine economic disaster in this country since the Great Depression, and compared to someplace like Weimar Germany, we can't even say our "Great" depression was all that "Great." Given that fact, I don't think any particular prediction has much behind it.

That said, if we DO ever reach the point of true economic collapse, I'd say all bets are off regarding race as having a significant role in violent crime (except to the degree that minorities are generally lower on the economic ladder than the White majority). This country saw its largest rise in communist and socialist party membership in the 20s and 30s, and that was accompanied by riots and other social unrest.
 
Back
Top