LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

The Kraft Rulez (2011 Edition)

RobDownSouth

RobDownSouth

No Kings
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Posts
77,656
The Kraft Rulez
2011 Edition​

Whenever things aren't going well in a political discussion:

  1. Accuse your political opponent of being an alt
  2. If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being gay
  3. If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being a pedophile
  4. If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being a misogynist
  5. If that doesn't work, attack your political opponent's religious beliefs, or lack of religious beliefs (whichever will advance YOUR argument)
  6. If that doesn't work, attack your opponent's race
  7. If that doesn't work, mock your opponent's weight and/or physical appearance
  8. If that doesn't work, mock your opponent's marital status and/or lifestyle
  9. If that doesn't work, criticize your opponent's avatar, tagline and/or signature
  10. If that doesn't work, attack your national origin, country of residence and/or geographic location
  11. If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of supporting terrorism
  12. If that doesn't work, revise your own background to include previously undisclosed expertise in the subject area (may include being close friends with an "expert in the field of...")
  13. If that doesn't work, mock your opponent's spelling and/or grammatical errors
  14. If that doesn't work, create an alt to agree with your position
  15. Repeat as needed

99. If all else fails, brag that you have your political opponent on ignore, cutting and pasting the ignore message, because that will prove that you have a superior argument!

On July 26, 2009, the original Kraft Rulez made their debut on the Literotica General Board. These rules were intended to codify the typical responses made by right wing dullard Karen Kraft in political threads.

Given the marked increase in race-baiting and religious bigotry by Kraft, today (the 2nd anniversary of the original Rulez) marks the debut of a revised and improved version of the Kraft Rulez.
 
Last edited:
Karen is a Dix. If not, he should be. And, if he is, he should be ashamed. They all lie - in wait. Yes. You are the smartest one reading this.

There is going to be a poll to follow.
 
Wouldn't it make more sense to put the guy on ignore instead of giving him even more attention?
 
Powertone said:
obsessed much ?
Click to expand...

No, dear reader. I am not obsessed at all. I am just a dear reader. Just like you. There are not :p's enough to misplace my interest. Worry not, dear reader.

There is going to be a poll to follow.
 
Karen Kraft said:
It's all they got -- since the rest of us outed them with their alts.

LOL

They need to be much less obvious in their alt naming schemes.

(and stop fucking their kids while they're at it)
Click to expand...

The double axel!
Rules one and three in a single post!
Don't try this at home folks!

:rolleyes:
 
Wobnoid said:
No, dear reader. I am not obsessed at all. I am just a dear reader. Just like you. There are not :p's enough to misplace my interest. Worry not, dear reader.

There is going to be a poll to follow.
Click to expand...

and you're not an alt either...:rolleyes:
 
Powertone said:
and you're not an alt either...:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Whatever an alt here might be, prove this. And if this proposition is true, dear reader, what then is the consequence? These eyes read just as verily as any others, don't they? There is an entire board full of history to read and an entire world of tracks to cover. Are you casting a 'first stone'? That seems a bit bold, dear reader.

There is going to be a poll to follow.
 
RobDownSouth said:
The Kraft Rulez
2011 Edition​

Whenever things aren't going well in a political discussion:

  1. Accuse your political opponent of being an alt
  2. If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being gay
  3. If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being a pedophile
  4. If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being a misogynist
  5. If that doesn't work, attack your political opponent's religious beliefs, or lack of religious beliefs (whichever will advance YOUR argument)
  6. If that doesn't work, attack your opponent's race
  7. If that doesn't work, mock your opponent's weight and/or physical appearance
  8. If that doesn't work, mock your opponent's marital status and/or lifestyle
  9. If that doesn't work, attack your national origin, country of residence and/or geographic location
  10. If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of supporting terrorism
  11. If that doesn't work, revise your own background to include previously undisclosed expertise in the subject area (may include being close friends with an "expert in the field of...")
  12. Repeat as needed

13. If all else fails, brag that you have your political opponent on ignore, cutting and pasting the ignore message, because that will prove that you have a superior argument!

On July 26, 2009, the original Kraft Rulez made their debut on the Literotica General Board. These rules were intended to codify the typical responses made by right wing dullard Karen Kraft in political threads.

Given the marked increase in race-baiting and religious bigotry by Kraft, today (the 2nd anniversary of the original Rulez) marks the debut of a revised and improved version of the Kraft Rulez.
Click to expand...

You forgot one. Create an alt to come in & say that you were right.
 
RobDownSouth has trotted out nearly ALL of his alts today.

I'm sure It's very impressed with itself.

Dude: we all see that it's just you and your stupid, obvious alts. We've seen that for years.

BTW - did you use some lube when you put her......

nevermind.

Hahahahahahahahaha...ha.
 
RobDownSouth said:
The Kraft Rulez
2011 Edition​

Whenever things aren't going well in a political discussion:

  1. Accuse your political opponent of being an alt
  2. If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being gay
  3. If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being a pedophile
  4. If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being a misogynist
  5. If that doesn't work, attack your political opponent's religious beliefs, or lack of religious beliefs (whichever will advance YOUR argument)
  6. If that doesn't work, attack your opponent's race
  7. If that doesn't work, mock your opponent's weight and/or physical appearance
  8. If that doesn't work, mock your opponent's marital status and/or lifestyle
  9. If that doesn't work, criticize your opponent's avatar, tagline and/or signature
  10. If that doesn't work, attack your national origin, country of residence and/or geographic location
  11. If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of supporting terrorism
  12. If that doesn't work, revise your own background to include previously undisclosed expertise in the subject area (may include being close friends with an "expert in the field of...")
  13. If that doesn't work, mock your opponent's spelling and/or grammatical errors
  14. If that doesn't work, create an alt to agree with your position
  15. Repeat as needed

99. If all else fails, brag that you have your political opponent on ignore, cutting and pasting the ignore message, because that will prove that you have a superior argument!

On July 26, 2009, the original Kraft Rulez made their debut on the Literotica General Board. These rules were intended to codify the typical responses made by right wing dullard Karen Kraft in political threads.

Given the marked increase in race-baiting and religious bigotry by Kraft, today (the 2nd anniversary of the original Rulez) marks the debut of a revised and improved version of the Kraft Rulez.
Click to expand...


Still rings true today.
 
16. If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of lovin' Merslims.
 
Last edited:
NeverEndingMe said:
kind of early to be drunk off the cuckold juice ... isn't it little boys?
Click to expand...

Kinda early to display your lack of anything useful by resorting to your depressingly familiar and unoriginal ad hominem attacks, isn't it, Captain Derptastic?
Someday, maybe, you'll exhibit intellectual depth measured in something other than picometres and mental abilities equal to a developmentally challenged sponge (with no insult intended to the developmentally challenged sponge).
Perhaps then you'll manage to come up with, at the very least, a somewhat original insult.
Perhaps a monkey at the zoo will have a bout of explosive diarrhea that results in a Picasso.
Given the likelihood of either scenario, I think the odds favor the liquefied fecal Picasso.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Male low sex drive?
Replies
11
Views
548
PrettynPetite
P
F
🧳✈️ Where in the World Are You, Lit Peeps? The Traveling Perverts Thread! 🌍😏
Replies
2
Views
127
13Fantasies
13Fantasies
B
I Dreamed About My Wife's "Twin Friend."
Replies
1
Views
284
lifeis2short2b
L
pure_romance
editing a published story...
Replies
2
Views
204
pure_romance
pure_romance
N
Feature request or at least request for better understanding of site functionality
Replies
0
Views
162
ninjanoodles
N
Back
Top