Two Examples of Fascism Run by Banks

eyer

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 27, 2010
Posts
21,263
by Ethan Jacobs, J.D.

"According to Italy’s former fascist dictator and MI5 asset, Benito Mussolini, “fascism should rightly be called corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power." The following examples demonstrate fascism/corporatism within the banking structure of the United States.

JP Morgan and Bank of America

JP Morgan and Bank of America obtain profits by issuing government funded food stamps/subsidies.

JP Morgan is the largest processor of food stamp benefits in the United States. JP Morgan has contracted to provide food stamp debit cards in 26 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. JP Morgan is paid for each case that it handles, so that means that the more Americans that go on food stamps, the more profits JP Morgan makes.

Currently, approximately 44.2 million Americans (1 in 7) are receiving food stamps, which means JP Morgan will continue to reap great profits in addition to their regular derivatives and fractional reserve banking scams.

Not to be left out, Bank of America and Visa struck a deal with the State of California:

"The Employment Development Department (EDD) Debit CardSM from Bank of America is the new and more efficient way of delivering California State Disability Insurance (Disability Insurance [DI], Paid Family Leave [PFL]), and beginning July 8, 2011 Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefit payments…The EDD Debit CardSM can be used everywhere Visa® debit cards are accepted."

Of course, using the fascist debit card is subject to bank fees. Therefore, rather than issuing checks directly to recipients, California chose a debit card system that will guarantee fees and profits paid to B of A and Visa.

The Federal Reserve

The Federal Reserve banking system is privately owned. Its shareholders are private banks. It creates money out of nothing and loans it to the government with interest, thereby transforming citizens into collective debt slaves called “taxpayers.” The Federal Reserve is not held accountable by Congress, which is supposed to have the power of the purse, and openly admits such.

The Federal Reserve Act was written in secret during 1910 on Jeykll Island by the following banksters and their minions:

1. Nelson W. Aldrich, Republican "whip" in the Senate, Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, business associate of J.P. Morgan, father-in-law to John D. Rockefeller, Jr.;

2. Abraham Piatt Andrew, Assistant Secretary of the United States Treasury;

3. Frank A. Vanderlip, president of the National City Bank of New York, the most powerful of the banks at that time, representing William Rockefeller and the international investment banking house of Kuhn, Loeb & Company;

4. Henry P. Davison, senior partner of the J.P Morgan Company;

5. Charles D. Norton, president of J.P. Morgan's First National Bank of New York;

6. Benjamin Strong, head of J.P. Morgan's Bankers Trust Company; and

7. Paul M. Warburg, a partner in Kuhn, Loeb & Company, a representative of the Rothschild banking dynasty in England and France, and brother to Max Warburg who was head of the Warburg banking consortium in Germany and the Netherlands.

Congress and President Woodrow Wilson committed treason in 1913 by passing the Federal Reserve Act, which meant that the U.S. government would now borrow money from private banks at interest.

Also in 1913, the Internal Revenue Service started to collect income taxes under the 16th Amendment, which for the most part is used to pay interest on the national debt to the private banks that own the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve owners also profit by making favorable loans to the their private banks and allies:

Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs and Royal Bank of Scotland each borrowed at least $US30 billion ($29 billion) in 2008 from a Federal Reserve emergency lending program whose details weren't revealed to shareholders, members of Congress or the public…Units of 20 banks were required to bid at auctions for the cash. They paid interest rates as low as 0.01 per cent that December, when the Fed's main lending facility charged 0.5 per cent.

In essence, such loans are “free money” to giant banks. Even the least savvy investor could turn a profit if they were loaned billions of dollars at 0.01 percent interest. Small banks and individuals need not apply for such “borrowing programs.”

Approval ratings are another indication that Congress and CFR/Bilderberg Obama clearly represent corporate/banking interests and not the will of the people. Currently congress has 18 percent approval rating, while Obama’s is below fifty percent.

In conclusion, JP Morgan and Bank of America profit from government assistance programs. The Federal Reserve is a private bank that loans money to the government, thereby enslaving its citizens with the national debt. These two examples of fascism in the United States banking structure form the basis for ushering in the New World Order.

Fortunately, we as a people can easily remove these fascist systems. The largest banks must be boycotted and the Federal Reserve System abolished like previous and more open forms of slavery.

http://www.activistpost.com/2011/07/two-examples-of-fascism-run-by-banks.html

Ethan Jacobs is founder of Beachday Surfwear. He holds a Juris Doctor and Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science. Ethan’s passion is researching and writing about important issues to defeat every form of tyranny over the mind of man.


[see any Rockefellers up there, KingO?

Isn't this debt creation a sweet deal? "Borrow" money to "transfer" to other fascists, then collect from the taxpayers to pay the fascists interest on that "borrowed" $$, too...

...right up your Rockefeller Republican socialist-economic alley, huh?

And just think...

...the fascists are ready to do it again.

How much interest do you reckon the fascists will "make" on another $2.5 trillion that they'll take a big chunk of right of the bat?]
 
by Ethan Jacobs, J.D.

"According to Italy’s former fascist dictator and MI5 asset, Benito Mussolini, “fascism should rightly be called corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power."

Mussolini did not mean "corporate" in the sense of business corporations. Corporatism is a different thing.

Corporatism, also known as corporativism, is a system of economic, political, or social organization that involves division of the people of society into corporate groups, such as agricultural, business, ethnic, labor, military, patronage, or scientific affiliations, on the basis of common interests.[1]

In 1881, Pope Leo XIII commissioned theologians and social thinkers to study corporatism and provide a definition for it. In 1884 in Freiburg, the commission declared that corporatism was a "system of social organization that has at its base the grouping of men according to the community of their natural interests and social functions, and as true and proper organs of the state they direct and coordinate labor and capital in matters of common interest."[2]

Corporatism is based theoretically upon the interpretation of a community as an organic body.[3][4] The term corporatism is based on the Latin root "corp" meaning "body".[4]

One of the main types of corporatism is economic tripartism involving negotiations between business, labour, and state interest groups to establish economic policy.[5]

Corporatism is related to the sociological concept of structural functionalism.[6] Corporate social interaction is common within kinship groups such as families, clans and ethnicities.[7] Aside from humans, certain animal species are known to exhibit strong corporate social organization, such as penguins.[8][9]

Corporatist types of community and social interaction are common to many ideologies, including: absolutism, capitalism, conservatism, fascism, liberalism, progressivism, reactionism, socialism, and syndicalism.[10]

<snip>

Fascism's theory of economic corporatism involved management of sectors of the economy by government or privately controlled organizations (corporations). Each trade union or employer corporation would, theoretically, represent its professional concerns, especially by negotiation of labor contracts and the like. This method, it was theorized, could result in harmony amongst social classes.[30] Authors have noted, however, that de facto economic corporatism was also used to reduce opposition and reward political loyalty.[31]

In Italy from 1922 until 1943, corporatism became influential amongst Italian nationalists led by Benito Mussolini. The Charter of Carnaro gained much popularity as the prototype of a 'corporative state', having displayed much within its tenets as a guild system combining the concepts of autonomy and authority in a special synthesis. This appealed to Hegelian thinkers who were seeking a new alternative to popular socialism and syndicalism which was also a progressive system of governing labor and still a new way of relating to political governance. Alfredo Rocco spoke of a corporative state and declared corporatist ideology in detail. Rocco would later become a member of the Italian Fascist regime Fascismo.[32]

Italian Fascism involved a corporatist political system in which economy was collectively managed by employers, workers and state officials by formal mechanisms at the national level.[33] This non-elected form of state officializing of every interest into the state was professed to reduce the marginalization of singular interests (as would allegedly happen by the unilateral end condition inherent in the democratic voting process). Corporatism would instead better recognize or 'incorporate' every divergent interest into the state organically, according to its supporters, thus being the inspiration for their use of the term totalitarian, perceivable to them as not meaning a coercive system but described distinctly as without coercion in the 1932 Doctrine of Fascism as thus:

When brought within the orbit of the State, Fascism recognizes the real needs which gave rise to socialism and trade unionism, giving them due weight in the guild or corporative system in which divergent interests are coordinated and harmonized in the unity of the State.[34]

and

[The state] is not simply a mechanism which limits the sphere of the supposed liberties of the individual... Neither has the Fascist conception of authority anything in common with that of a police ridden State... Far from crushing the individual, the Fascist State multiplies his energies, just as in a regiment a soldier is not diminished but multiplied by the number of his fellow soldiers.[34]

This prospect of Italian fascist corporatism claimed to be the direct heir of Georges Sorel's anarcho-collectivist, such that each interest was to form as its own entity with separate organizing parameters according to their own standards, only however within the corporative model of Italian fascism each was supposed to be incorporated through the auspices and organizing ability of a statist construct. This was by their reasoning the only possible way to achieve such a function, i.e. when resolved in the capability of an indissoluble state. Much of the corporatist influence upon Italian Fascism was partly due to the Fascists' attempts to gain endorsement by the Roman Catholic Church that itself sponsored corporatism.[35]

However fascism's corporatism was a top-down model of state control over the economy while the Roman Catholic Church's corporatism favored a bottom-up corporatism, whereby groups such as families and professional groups would voluntarily work together.[35][36] The fascist state corporatism influenced the governments and economies of a number of Roman Catholic countries, such as the government of Engelbert Dollfuss in Austria and António de Oliveira Salazar in Portugal, but also Konstantin Päts and Karlis Ulmanis in non-Catholic Estonia and Latvia. Fascists in non-Catholic countries also supported Italian Fascist corporatism, including Oswald Mosley of the British Union of Fascists who commended corporatism and said that "it means a nation organized as the human body, with each organ performing its individual function but working in harmony with the whole".[37] Mosley also considered corporatism as an attack on laissez-faire economics and "international finance".[37]
 
Mussolini did not mean "corporate" in the sense of business corporations. Corporatism is a different thing.

Mussolini didn't refer to your "corporate"...

...did he?

His comment was referencing fascism to corporatism.

He understood the difference...

...yet you had to search wiki again to incorporate irrelevance.

Good job...

...it's a clue to why you're fond of not only Rockefeller Republicans but also of defending Rockefellers themselves from any connection to bankers.
 
Mussolini didn't refer to your "corporate"...

...did he?

His comment was referencing fascism to corporatism.

He understood the difference...

...yet you had to search wiki again to incorporate irrelevance.

I'm sure he understood the difference. The irrelevance is that of Mussolini's comment to your argument, if such it can be called. Dominance of the state by financial-industry interests or by any other industry's interests or by the whole biz-sector together is a bad thing, but it is not anything do to with fascism.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure he understood the difference. The irrelevance is that of Mussolini's comment to your argument, if such it can be called. Dominance of the state by financial-industry interests or by any other industry's interests or by the whole biz-sector together is a bad thing, but it is not anything do to with fascism.

Again, Mussolini's comment has nothing to do with your "Dominance of the state by financial-industry interests or...blah, blah, blah...

fascism should rightly be called corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power."

Rooseveltian relativitis is only prevalent among socialists...
 
JP Morgan and Bank of America

JP Morgan and Bank of America obtain profits by issuing government funded food stamps/subsidies.

JP Morgan is the largest processor of food stamp benefits in the United States. JP Morgan has contracted to provide food stamp debit cards in 26 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. JP Morgan is paid for each case that it handles, so that means that the more Americans that go on food stamps, the more profits JP Morgan makes.

If one reads carefully, they will see this is a government contract for a private enterprise to provide a government service. It reduces the number of government employees needed to administer the program.

It seems conservatives just can't be satisfied. Give them what they demand and they still bitch.
 
Again, Mussolini's comment has nothing to do with your "Dominance of the state by financial-industry interests or...blah, blah, blah...

That's what I said, eyer, and what you appear to have completely misunderstood. That Mussolini was not talking about "corporations" as we now use the word. Italian fascism is completely irrelevant and bears no comparison to the role business interests now play in American politics/government.
 
Back
Top