New story idea/interracial encounter

A. it arouses fewer women than you'd think. if women writers mention dick size in a story it's most often because they know the men would.

B. Since dick size hardle matters to me at all, I am more interested in the dude's self-perception issues, as revealed by the comment. That reveal, in fact, is sexy to many women, even though not al of them are aware of it. Like the wrist bone, which most women notice-- if you ask them they are incredibly surprised, but will tell you it's true.
The bolded is a very insightful and astute remark, grasshopper. ;)

So you're saying a guy referring to his cock as being large is sexy? I will take your word for that. And thank you for the compliment. Maybe I should take the migraine meds everyday!

Okay I'll bite (when asked) I have never heard of the "wrist bone" being looked at. Can you explain that to me? We're talking about that kind of knobby bone that hurts like a bitch if I whack it, right? What does that tell a woman?
 
He likely wasn't planning on having sex that involved another person anyway. (Especially if he thought you had to go to the counter to get a package of condoms.)

Well I was saying a teenager. When I was a teenager the rite aid around the corner from me had them at the counter and you had to ask for them. These days of course they are available in a machine in high school bathrooms. Guess I am dating myself.
 
I think that the significant point is that you aren't in the demographic for NorthRock's vignette from the getgo.

Neither am I, but I don't deny that there is such a demographic.
Oh, i don't know... I can enjoy a sweet and conflict-free interracial encounter when the right mood hits me ;)
So you're saying a guy referring to his cock as being large is sexy? I will take your word for that. And thank you for the compliment. Maybe I should take the migraine meds everyday!
No, that isn't what i said. I'll take pity on you with your migraine and all-- I said that the self-perception issues that he reveals by way of his claim-- can be sexy. It's that glimpse of what's behind his eyeballs. (I know what yours feel like right now!)
Okay I'll bite (when asked) I have never heard of the "wrist bone" being looked at. Can you explain that to me? We're talking about that kind of knobby bone that hurts like a bitch if I whack it, right? What does that tell a woman?
that's the bunny, yeah.

What does it tell a woman? I dunno-- There isn't very much research on the matter as of yet. But try asking, when the moment is right for such things, of course... It helps if they have a bunch of photos of sexy men as visual aide, I suggest http://sexisnotheenemy.tumblr.com I love the look of puzzlement and realisation on women's faces as they mull over the question!

What do a pair of titties tell a man?
 
Oh, i don't know... I can enjoy a sweet and conflict-free interracial encounter when the right mood hits me ;)
No, that isn't what i said. I'll take pity on you with your migraine and all-- I said that the self-perception issues that he reveals by way of his claim-- can be sexy. It's that glimpse of what's behind his eyeballs. (I know what yours feel like right now!)that's the bunny, yeah.

What does it tell a woman? I dunno-- There isn't very much research on the matter as of yet. But try asking, when the moment is right for such things, of course... It helps if they have a bunch of photos of sexy men as visual aide, I suggest http://sexisnotheenemy.tumblr.com I love the look of puzzlement and realisation on women's faces as they mull over the question!

What do a pair of titties tell a man?

I don;t think titties tell me anything they just look good. Tits however are a sexual part of the body. I don;t know about the wrist bone but whatever. Just one more thing for some guys to be insecure about. I can see it now.

"As I slipped on my glove (large because of my protruding wrist bone.") I...
 
I don;t think titties tell me anything they just look good. Tits however are a sexual part of the body. I don;t know about the wrist bone but whatever. Just one more thing for some guys to be insecure about. I can see it now.

"As I slipped on my glove (large because of my protruding wrist bone.") I...
men feel that tits are a sexual part of the body, and for some women they are. But mine, for example were not sensitive at all, until after I hit menopause.

I don't think a wrist tells me anything, but it looks good.
 
Last edited:
Oh grow up with that. Some people apparently lose their heads when someone expresses an opinion that is not consistent with the "porn world" we write in.

In my experience the people who get upset with monogamous people are swingers (and there is nothing wrong with that if it makes you happy) who are not as secure in their lifestyle as they think they are and need to attack monogamy as if it were a disease and that the people who practice it are prudes or insecure themselves.

"it takes a real man to share his wife!" No it takes someone without a desire for or a concept of what a real relationship is.

"Please. It takes a real man (or woman) to give their hearts to one person.

You obviously have something you need to justify. Go watch Dr. Phil or something will you?

Now there did I give you what you wanted? I can try harder next time.;)

Third person omniscient is a wonderful tool in storytelling, but it does not serve you well in rhetoric discouse. The problem is that you lack perfect knowledge. You assume ideas that I have never considered and statements that I have never made, and then respond to them as though they were my positions. You may believe that you are scoring points, but the sum of zero plus zero is still zero.

I have never argued against monogamy, nor I have I advocated any form of polygamy. I have never ridiculed any person for their beliefs, choices, or lifestyle. I have always been an advocate of tolerance.

Your diatribe, on the other hand, proves my point better than I ever could: Merely mentioning marital status makes some people go absolutely batshit crazy.
 
Third person omniscient is a wonderful tool in storytelling,

Not so much--at least in the U.S. market. It tends to close the reader out of the delights of discovery and to emphasize telling over showing inordinately.

(Yes, I know this wasn't the thrust of your posting.)
 
Third person omniscient is a wonderful tool in storytelling, but it does not serve you well in rhetoric discouse. The problem is that you lack perfect knowledge. You assume ideas that I have never considered and statements that I have never made, and then respond to them as though they were my positions. You may believe that you are scoring points, but the sum of zero plus zero is still zero.

I have never argued against monogamy, nor I have I advocated any form of polygamy. I have never ridiculed any person for their beliefs, choices, or lifestyle. I have always been an advocate of tolerance.

Your diatribe, on the other hand, proves my point better than I ever could: Merely mentioning marital status makes some people go absolutely batshit crazy.
Q.E.D. huh?
 
Third person omniscient is a wonderful tool in storytelling, but it does not serve you well in rhetoric discouse. The problem is that you lack perfect knowledge. You assume ideas that I have never considered and statements that I have never made, and then respond to them as though they were my positions. You may believe that you are scoring points, but the sum of zero plus zero is still zero.

I have never argued against monogamy, nor I have I advocated any form of polygamy. I have never ridiculed any person for their beliefs, choices, or lifestyle. I have always been an advocate of tolerance.

Your diatribe, on the other hand, proves my point better than I ever could: Merely mentioning marital status makes some people go absolutely batshit crazy.

And you were totally assuming that because I made the comment that I personally do not believe in cheating that I would never read a story that involved it or would troll it. I would never sleep with my mother but I have written stories along those lines.

So say what you want but go back to the original thread because you were the one who jumped the gun on both myself and Pennlady. As for my assumptions I pent a lot of time around swingers in my younger years-I was the young single guy that was lucky enough to get invited as the "third"- and I have seen a lot of those relationships go bad.

The ones who most vehemently defended the lifestyle were the ones that ended up with failed marriages. They were the ones who mocked the monogamous couples and challenged their manhood and called them prudes because at the end of the day they felt as if they were wrong and needed others to join them.

Don't tell me what I don't know. Half the authors on this site write from fantasy. half have no experience or very little real life experience in the genre's they write in or sex in general other than vanilla marriages. I am not one of them.
 
Oooh, young people behaving badly, who would have possibly imagined it?

yep, kids will be kids and young men will challenge each other's manhoods. And their young wives will leave them eventually, either for a more manhoodly man(if they buy into the belief) or one who does less chest thumping. Because that shit can give a girl a headache.

Excuse me while I roll my eyes. .
 
NRJ,I liked your "Trojan large" thing (reminded me of my White Trash stories a bit), but you might want to work it in to the regular text, or add other funny stuff.

What you have is not a story, but what is called a stroker. Add a couple of hundred words, submit it and have at it and have fun! Maybe it'll grow into a story.
 
NRJ,I liked your "Trojan large" thing (reminded me of my White Trash stories a bit), but you might want to work it in to the regular text, or add other funny stuff.

What you have is not a story, but what is called a stroker. Add a couple of hundred words, submit it and have at it and have fun! Maybe it'll grow into a story.

I was thinking on this. I think it would be very interesting if someone took this and made a story out of it (I would be game) and submitted it to the same category, and NRJ submitted this as it is. I'm willing to bet his version would get more views, votes, and comments and higher ratings.
 
Oooh, young people behaving badly, who would have possibly imagined it?

yep, kids will be kids and young men will challenge each other's manhoods. And their young wives will leave them eventually, either for a more manhoodly man(if they buy into the belief) or one who does less chest thumping. Because that shit can give a girl a headache.

Excuse me while I roll my eyes. .

I'm beyond having my manhood challenged. Nor do I judge other people's sex lives. However I will admit to allowing myself to be baited when others need to justify their life style and cram their beliefs down my throat. Do whatever the fuck you want just don;t feel the need to pick on what I do or constantly brag about what you do. (you as in general not you Stella)

I will repeat a prior point when someone over zealously denies something they are all but admitting it.
 
I'm beyond having my manhood challenged. Nor do I judge other people's sex lives. However I will admit to allowing myself to be baited when others need to justify their life style and cram their beliefs down my throat. Do whatever the fuck you want just don;t feel the need to pick on what I do or constantly brag about what you do. (you as in general not you Stella)
But you are citing your experiences of a younger day as a reason to behave like a defensive chest beater-- now, at an advanced age.

You, personally, in this case.
I will repeat a prior point when someone over zealously denies something they are all but admitting it.
Who decides what "overzealous" is?

Are you still beating your wife?
 
But you are citing your experiences of a younger day as a reason to behave like a defensive chest beater-- now, at an advanced age.

You, personally, in this case. Who decides what "overzealous" is?

Are you still beating your wife?

Nice try. Are you trying to get an over zealous reaction out of me? Answer is only every other weekend because we are both switches and take turns.
 
Last edited:
I was thinking on this. I think it would be very interesting if someone took this and made a story out of it (I would be game) and submitted it to the same category, and NRJ submitted this as it is. I'm willing to bet his version would get more views, votes, and comments and higher ratings.

A writing challenge. I like it!

Everyone in this thread takes the original post, adds no more than 500 (1000?) words, submits it in the same category and see what happens.
 
A writing challenge. I like it!

Everyone in this thread takes the original post, adds no more than 500 (1000?) words, submits it in the same category and see what happens.

Negative. To make it a story shouldn't have a word limit. (And I don't think 500 or l,000 words would do it).
 
I beat my wife up sometimes. :eek: However, most mornings she gets out of bed before I do. :rolleyes:
 
I was thinking on this. I think it would be very interesting if someone took this and made a story out of it (I would be game) and submitted it to the same category, and NRJ submitted this as it is. I'm willing to bet his version would get more views, votes, and comments and higher ratings.

If you are referring to somebody starting with the story on the OP and using it as an outline and making a work of literary merit out of it, You are very likely right. However, false modesty aside, if I were to start with the story and flesh it out (soft, succulent flesh, of course) it woul probably be better received than the version posted by NRJ. By that, I mean more views, a higher voting score and feedback that would be more complimentary. :)

I'm not going to do it, though, because I prefer doing my own work and doing it from scratch.
 
If you are referring to somebody starting with the story on the OP and using it as an outline and making a work of literary merit out of it, You are very likely right. However, false modesty aside, if I were to start with the story and flesh it out (soft, succulent flesh, of course) it woul probably be better received than the version posted by NRJ. By that, I mean more views, a higher voting score and feedback that would be more complimentary. :)

I'm not going to do it, though, because I prefer doing my own work and doing it from scratch.

No. I already posted a version of what I would suggest would make a story out of it.

And, as far as making a story, I pretty much think I could do a better job than you could do. Truth be known, I don't think you write plotted stories either. My point was that I think the preponderance of readers here are just fine with the basic stroke.

My suggestion on doing it was to evidence that point, not to write as I prefer.
 
Last edited:
No. I already posted a version of what I would suggest would make a story out of it.

And, as far as making a story, I pretty much think I could do a better job than you could do. Truth be known, I don't think you write plotted stories either. My point was that I think the preponderance of readers here are just fine with the basic stroke.

My suggestion on doing it was to evidence that point, not to write as I prefer.

I write very few stories with actual plots and character development, and I make no pretense of creating meritorious work. I even joke about it, sometimes asking something like "Plot? What's that?" The few exceptions are stories in chapters, such as those about Ruthie or Angel Jones or Brenda.

That sounds like a challenge, but I am not going to accept it, whether you mean a literary story or a stroke story. As I said before, I work from scratch, except sometimes using a plot bunny supplied by somebody, especially by a reader.
 
Northrock: what I don't think anyone has explained/mentioned (unless I missed it, and I might have), is that a story usually revolves around some type of conflict a character has, and how that conflict is resolved.

What you have is a hot little vignette (please refrain from mentioning numerical sizes), but there isn't any conflict or conflict resolution.

Try looking at it that way if you'd like to turn what you have into a story. :)
 
I write very few stories with actual plots and character development, and I make no pretense of creating meritorious work. I even joke about it, sometimes asking something like "Plot? What's that?" The few exceptions are stories in chapters, such as those about Ruthie or Angel Jones or Brenda.

That sounds like a challenge, but I am not going to accept it, whether you mean a literary story or a stroke story. As I said before, I work from scratch, except sometimes using a plot bunny supplied by somebody, especially by a reader.

Mine was not a challenge of you. It was noting you weren't understanding the issue--and also that you'd hardly be one to write a contrasting story to the OP's vignette, as your writings are pretty much the same thing.
 
Mine was not a challenge of you. It was noting you weren't understanding the issue--and also that you'd hardly be one to write a contrasting story to the OP's vignette, as your writings are pretty much the same thing.

They are pretty much the same thing, except I like to think I do them better. :)
 
Back
Top