The Cool Science Stuff Thread

Getting back to the Large Hardon Collider...

NO MORE "HARDON" JOKES!!!

Getting back to the Large Hadron Collider...

The Plot Of The Week - ATLAS Dilepton Resonance Search

The ATLAS Collaboration, one of the two high-energy physics experiments at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, has just produced updated results of their ongoing search for new heavy particles decaying into lepton pairs. They are now using up to 236 inverse picobarns of 7 TeV collisions, which is seven times more data than previous searches based on 2010 datasets. A seven-fold increase in data size grants a significant increase in sensitivity, so it is worth taking a look at what they see.

The technical way to call the sought particles is "Z' resonances", since they can be thought of as heavier brothers of the Z boson, although they may well have different properties; they are usually the result of adding one U(1) group to the group structure of the Standard Model (which is a SU(2)xU(1) combination, plus a SU(3) for strong interactions). U(1) is a one-dimensional unitary group of transformations, and it introduces just a new particle in the theory, a new boson which mediates a new interaction. A Z' might not explain a lot about the way things really work at a fundamental level, but many like such "minimal" extensions of the Standard Model, mainly because they are easy to cook up and not in too striking disagreement with current data.

The search for Z' resonances is pursued with momentum in CMS and ATLAS. I know what is going on in CMS being a member of that collaboration, but I only get to know where ATLAS stands when I get to read their public papers. That's why I am interesting in checking their high-mass spectrum, to see if they see anything at odds with predictions. In two words, they don't. Check it out in the dimuon invariant mass distribution below:


https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2011-083/fig_02.png

The data are black points (a very stable standard by now, unfortunately about the only world-wide agreement among HEP experiments -a painful concept for those like me, who are working to reach at least lab-wide agreements on limit-setting procedures and other highly less trivial things), and backgrounds are shown with different vivid colours. Of course by far the most important process contributing to the data (which feature two muons and little else in the event) is Drell-Yan production -the process whereby a Z boson or a virtual photon is produced by quark-antiquark annihilation. This is shown in light blue. Other processes include the production of two bosons together (ZZ, or ZW), in yellow; and top pair production (in red). The data, needless to say, closely follows the sum of backgrounds, while a Z' resonance would produce a curve such as the empty histograms shown on the right (which correspond to the signal one would see if a Z' existed with a mass of one to 1.5 TeV).

Some of the words I've copied appear to be in English...but Damn!! Is this cool or what?
 
Getting back to the Large Hardon Collider...

NO MORE "HARDON" JOKES!!!

Getting back to the Large Hadron Collider...

The Plot Of The Week - ATLAS Dilepton Resonance Search

The ATLAS Collaboration, one of the two high-energy physics experiments at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, has just produced updated results of their ongoing search for new heavy particles decaying into lepton pairs. They are now using up to 236 inverse picobarns of 7 TeV collisions, which is seven times more data than previous searches based on 2010 datasets. A seven-fold increase in data size grants a significant increase in sensitivity, so it is worth taking a look at what they see.

The technical way to call the sought particles is "Z' resonances", since they can be thought of as heavier brothers of the Z boson, although they may well have different properties; they are usually the result of adding one U(1) group to the group structure of the Standard Model (which is a SU(2)xU(1) combination, plus a SU(3) for strong interactions). U(1) is a one-dimensional unitary group of transformations, and it introduces just a new particle in the theory, a new boson which mediates a new interaction. A Z' might not explain a lot about the way things really work at a fundamental level, but many like such "minimal" extensions of the Standard Model, mainly because they are easy to cook up and not in too striking disagreement with current data.

The search for Z' resonances is pursued with momentum in CMS and ATLAS. I know what is going on in CMS being a member of that collaboration, but I only get to know where ATLAS stands when I get to read their public papers. That's why I am interesting in checking their high-mass spectrum, to see if they see anything at odds with predictions. In two words, they don't. Check it out in the dimuon invariant mass distribution below:


https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2011-083/fig_02.png

The data are black points (a very stable standard by now, unfortunately about the only world-wide agreement among HEP experiments -a painful concept for those like me, who are working to reach at least lab-wide agreements on limit-setting procedures and other highly less trivial things), and backgrounds are shown with different vivid colours. Of course by far the most important process contributing to the data (which feature two muons and little else in the event) is Drell-Yan production -the process whereby a Z boson or a virtual photon is produced by quark-antiquark annihilation. This is shown in light blue. Other processes include the production of two bosons together (ZZ, or ZW), in yellow; and top pair production (in red). The data, needless to say, closely follows the sum of backgrounds, while a Z' resonance would produce a curve such as the empty histograms shown on the right (which correspond to the signal one would see if a Z' existed with a mass of one to 1.5 TeV).

Some of the words I've copied appear to be in English...but Damn!! Is this cool or what?

We're like primitives nodding with open mouths as our medicine men explain how the tribe descended from a giant turtle floating on the back of a whale on the back of a cosmic fish.
 
We're like primitives nodding with open mouths as our medicine men explain how the tribe descended from a giant turtle floating on the back of a whale on the back of a cosmic fish.

The turtle, the whale and the fish...did they cost about $9,000,000,000.00?
 
We're like primitives nodding with open mouths as our medicine men explain how the tribe descended from a giant turtle floating on the back of a whale on the back of a cosmic fish.

Or like kids in a bar trying to lipsynch that Lionel Ritchie song. Eh jambo jambo!
 
Lights out for the Sea Shadow

http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20110620/od_yblog_upshot/lights-out-for-the-sea-shadow


Call it a funeral at sea for the U.S. Navy's Sea Shadow. The stealth ship, which served as an inspiration for the supervillain's supervessel in the James Bond movie "Tomorrow Never Dies," is set to be dismantled and recycled.

The Navy had hoped that a private buyer would come forward and take the spy ship off its hands. Alas, there were no takers, so the bizarre black Sea Shadow is heading for the scrap heap.

http://www.williamson-labs.com/images/seashadow-500.jpg
 
Last edited:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20110620/od_yblog_upshot/lights-out-for-the-sea-shadow


Call it a funeral at sea for the U.S. Navy's Sea Shadow. The stealth ship, which served as an inspiration for the supervillain's supervessel in the James Bond movie "Tomorrow Never Dies," is set to be dismantled and recycled.

The Navy had hoped that a private buyer would come forward and take the spy ship off its hands. Alas, there were no takers, so the bizarre black Sea Shadow is heading for the scrap heap.

http://www.williamson-labs.com/images/seashadow-500.jpg
That makes no sense. Why dismantle it? Just mothball it, or sell it.

Unless this is just a cover story....
 
Because this particular "experimental tech" isn't worth squat.

The tech may not work, but it provides directional insight into the Navy's warfare needs and requirements. While not as critical as a widget that works, do we really want others to know where we're headed?
 
Roman Gladiator's Gravestone Describes Fatal Foul

http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience...e/romangladiatorsgravestonedescribesfatalfoul

An enigmatic message on a Roman gladiator's 1,800-year-old tombstone has finally been decoded, telling a treacherous tale.

The epitaph and art on the tombstone suggest the gladiator, named Diodorus, lost the battle (and his life) due to a referee's error, according to Michael Carter, a professor at Brock University in St. Catharines, Canada. Carter studies gladiator contests and other spectacles in the eastern part of the Roman Empire.

He examined the stone, which was discovered a century ago in Turkey, trying to determine what the drawing and inscription meant. [Top 10 Weird Ways We Deal With the Dead]
 
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20110620/od_yblog_upshot/lights-out-for-the-sea-shadow


Call it a funeral at sea for the U.S. Navy's Sea Shadow. The stealth ship, which served as an inspiration for the supervillain's supervessel in the James Bond movie "Tomorrow Never Dies," is set to be dismantled and recycled.

The Navy had hoped that a private buyer would come forward and take the spy ship off its hands. Alas, there were no takers, so the bizarre black Sea Shadow is heading for the scrap heap.

http://www.williamson-labs.com/images/seashadow-500.jpg

they should at least take it out to the middle of nowhere and put it on a farm.
 
they should at least take it out to the middle of nowhere and put it on a farm.
The Sea Shadow is fifteen years old and the Navy has been trying to give it to a Museum for five years. There's very little "secret technology" in it that is still secret, if any.
 
The Sea Shadow is fifteen years old and the Navy has been trying to give it to a Museum for five years. There's very little "secret technology" in it that is still secret, if any.

have they been trying to give it away, or are they trying to sell it? it may be worth more in parts.
 
i want mike yates to wake up with it in his backyard one morning. staring at him right through the window.
 
have they been trying to give it away, or are they trying to sell it? it may be worth more in parts.
The few news articles I found said they've been trying to donate it to a museum or other organization as a static display. Presumably with the receiving organization paying the freight to transport and display it since that is the normal procedure with donated aircraft and other equipment for static display exhibits; the military "demilitarizes" the equipment and the exhibiter arranges transport and infrastructure.
 
Strange,,, its sat nite, late & I'm ending with the science thread instead of the nip or puss 1.
talk about bored. & i dont even have a crap worth to share here. & i read
discover pop sci, & pop mech all the time. butt i do enjoy & find the stale humor
watching the "BIG BANG THEORY"

& i heard about that star a few weeks ago on yahoo i believe.
What they dont tell us is the real time line to that event & ending...D
Did we see it coming for yrs,, or was it something that just got grabed out of left field that we were lucky on??? even then,,, was this a few days while it was dragged in or just moments?
This makes alot of difference in understanding to all, especially us dumbasses.
 
Back
Top