Sarah Palin - the gift that keeps on giving

[MeeMie]

Who are you addressing? Certainly not me, since I didn't turn or twist her words. I provided two exact quotes from Palin.

You, among others, twisting words to try to make them mean what you want them to, in each of your posts.

I guess I am blind as a bat because I sure don't see in that quote where it says Revere fired a shot or rang a bell. Or that even a part of the reason for his ride was to warn the British.

Show me a quote from a historian where Revere rang bells and fired his guns like Palin said he did.

Do you really think the British didn't know the militia was there? Apparently Palin and you think they didn't know.

No where in Revere's account did he even hint that part of his purpose was to warn the British.

She said Paul Revere was ringing the bells and firing his gun to warn the British.

But the fact is that she made the statement as if the purpose of Revere's, Dawes' and Prescott's rides was to warn the British that they weren't going to take away our guns.

Even though along the way they did stop at houses and warn the residents also, that wasn't the main purpose. And they weren't ringing bells and shooting guns.

You constantly dismiss every piece of historical evidence that supports Palin's description of the midnight ride of Paul Revere, for each and every issue.

I've quoted several historical records to show that there were shots fired and bells ringing, yet you twist words and cling to your objection to mean "Revere fired shots and rang bells"

Even Paul Revere's own words state that he warned the British against going further. Yet, you insist that the record show that it was his goal all along to do.

You certainly are twisting Sarah Palin's short statement recollecting the historical moment to criticize her, when it is very apparent that she is much more well informed on the event than you claim to be.

 

[Powertone]

I thought Paul Revere made hit records...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOlaPBfmNa0

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Nobody contends that the purpose of Revere's ride was to warn Brits. The purpose was to warn Americans.

When captured, though, Revere stated he did warn the Brits of American mobilization.

In Palin's offhand reply to a casual question, she got a lot more of the story correct than the journalists and critics who rushed in to label her ignorant.

THE UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH:

1) She didn't get shit correct

2) Paul Revere was technically a traitor for warning the enemy and that's why the poem had to rewrite his legacy to make him look good

3) All of you guys are seriously fucking pathetic in your collective desperation to not own this massive fail made by your team. Just own it and let it wash away under the bridge of "revolution."

 

[Powertone]

^ yet you're completely comfortable owning the EPIC FAIL that is Barack Hussein Obama...go figger

 

[MeeMie]

THE UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH:

1) She didn't get shit correct

2) Paul Revere was technically a traitor for warning the enemy and that's why the poem had to rewrite his legacy to make him look good

3) All of you guys are seriously fucking pathetic in your collective desperation to not own this massive fail made by your team. Just own it and let it wash away under the bridge of "revolution."

Oh Boy!

How can we even begin to respond to that lunacy?

I know ...


Add New User to Ignore List:
IrezumiKis


Should have a long time ago ... one of the very few ... FINALLY!

 

[Luk]

^ yet you're completely comfortable owning the EPIC FAIL that is Barack Hussein Obama...go figger

Responding to someone you constantly claim to have on ignore:

FAIL

Oh Boy!

How can we even begin to respond to that lunacy?

I know ...


Add New User to Ignore List:
IrezumiKis


Should have a long time ago ... one of the very few ... FINALLY!

Putting someone on ignore because they call you out on your bullshit:


FAIL

Good job, Zumi!

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Oh Boy!

How can we even begin to respond to that lunacy?

I know ...


Add New User to Ignore List:
IrezumiKis


Should have a long time ago ... one of the very few ... FINALLY!

You know, I had no idea that you were as old as you were, but it kinda made sense, given your somewhat outdated mindset and the cocksucking love of convenient internet opinion blogs to speak for you. But I sure as hell didn't know that you were SUCH A FUCKING PUSSY.

Well, all I can say now is thank you for reminding us all what pussies do when their own shit is thrown back at them. Have fun eating them crackers, Polly!

 

[about_average]

You, among others, twisting words to try to make them mean what you want them to, in each of your posts.

Pot, meet kettle.
That's what all the right wing loony cool-aid drinkers are doing, twisting the historical record, including Revere's own words, to try to make Palin appear to have known what she was talking about. And quoting each other back and forth as proof. LOL

You constantly dismiss every piece of historical evidence that supports Palin's description of the midnight ride of Paul Revere, for each and every issue.

No one has provided any evidence that supports her statements.

I've quoted several historical records to show that there were shots fired and bells ringing, yet you twist words and cling to your objection to mean "Revere fired shots and rang bells"

No one denies bells were rung or shots fired. What didn't happen was those things being done by Revere, which Palin said they did.

Even Paul Revere's own words state that he warned the British against going further. Yet, you insist that the record show that it was his goal all along to do.

What record? The quote from Palin? Yes, she said that was part of his purpose and that's on the record. She even said it on Fox, so you know it's true that she said it.

You certainly are twisting Sarah Palin's short statement recollecting the historical moment to criticize her, when it is very apparent that she is much more well informed on the event than you claim to be.

I haven't twisted anything. I posted two of her quotes, verbatim.

But I give up, you're as silly as she is.

 

[zipman]

Nobody contends that the purpose of Revere's ride was to warn Brits. The purpose was to warn Americans.

When captured, though, Revere stated he did warn the Brits of American mobilization.

In Palin's offhand reply to a casual question, she got a lot more of the story correct than the journalists and critics who rushed in to label her ignorant.

Except for the small fact that she missed the very purpose of his ride which was to warn americans.

Everything else is nothing more than spin because otherwise, it's just another example of her overwhelming ignorance.

 

[Wok]

Except for the small fact that she missed the very purpose of his ride which was to warn americans.

Everything else is nothing more than spin because otherwise, it's just another example of her overwhelming ignorance.

Spin, on Lit?

No way!

 

[about_average]

Everything else is nothing more than spin because otherwise, it's just another example of her overwhelming ignorance.

What's so hilarious about her, but predictable, is that she fucked up on June 2, wastes 3 days when she could actually be educating herself about it and says on the 5th,
"Part of his ride was to warn the British that were already there.".

I'm quite sure she hasn't read any of the historical accounts at all.
One thing that is glaringly obvious is that if "part of his ride was to warn the British" then he wouldn't be trying to avoid them and trying to escape when he was captured.
She's obviously getting her "facts" from the right wing lunatics.

 

[coastal-boy]

I hereby refudiate all these facts

 

[DevilishTexan]

Katie Couric: When it comes to establishing your world view before you were tapped for VP, what newspapers did you read?

Palin: I've read most of them with a great appreciation for the press, for the media.

Katie Couric: But specifically, which ones have you read?

Palin: All of 'em, any of 'em.

Katie Couric: Can you name a few

Palin: Alaska isn't a foreign country. It's a microcosm of America.

She makes most of the left look like vindictive, babbling idiots.

And now weakass Couric is looking for another job HAAAA!
I bet she HATES Sarah. Who's laughing now Katie?

The left really don't need anyone to make them look like babbling idiots. It's not that they're stupid, it's just they know so much that isn't so.

 

[coastal-boy]

I hereby refudiate all these facts

I know many "misunderestimate" Palin's intelligence...

 

[Luk]

And now weakass Couric is looking for another job HAAAA!
I bet she HATES Sarah. Who's laughing now Katie?

The left really don't need anyone to make them look like babbling idiots. It's not that they're stupid, it's just they know so much that isn't so.

You must really like the way your sneakers taste.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/43297323?GT1=43001

Katie Couric makes move to ABC for talk show

ABC announced Monday a multiyear-deal with Couric to produce the talk show, set to bow in September 2012. She will work for ABC News in the interim.

Eight ABC-owned stations covering nearly one-quarter of the nation's population, including stations in New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, have agreed to air the show in their 3 p.m. ET time slots, ABC said.

I'm sure Katie will just be fine - with or without Palin to kick around.

 

[coastal-boy]

You must really like the way your sneakers taste.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/43297323?GT1=43001

Katie Couric makes move to ABC for talk show





I'm sure Katie will just be fine - with or without Palin to kick around.

Sarah has her movie...I'm confident it will be a blockbuster

 

[DevilishTexan]

You must really like the way your sneakers taste.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/43297323?GT1=43001

Katie Couric makes move to ABC for talk show

I'm sure Katie will just be fine - with or without Palin to kick around.

Yeah I'm sure her ratings will be orbital. Her cuteness factor wore off years ago. Maybe Okra can give her a job on OWN after her talk show tanks.
Oh wait......never mind.

 

[Luk]

Sarah has her movie...I'm confident it will be a blockbuster

Wonder if it will do better than Atlas Shrugged.

 

[coastal-boy]

Wonder if it will do better than Atlas Shrugged.

cult classic

 

[zipman]

You must really like the way your sneakers taste.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/43297323?GT1=43001

Katie Couric makes move to ABC for talk show


I'm sure Katie will just be fine - with or without Palin to kick around.

The funny thing is that as a reporter, she tossed out such a softball question that most people would have laughed at her and said she was biased in favor of Palin by asking it.

Who could have guessed that Palin wouldn't be able to answer it.

 

[busybody..]

Asshole

hey PUTZ


L.A. TIMES: You know how Sarah Palin said Paul Revere warned the British? Well, he did. Now, who looks stupid?


PAUL REVERE UPDATE: Experts back Sarah Palin’s historical account. Money quote: “A lot of the criticism is unfair and made by people who are themselves ignorant of history.”

http://bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view.bg?articleid=1343353

 

[landslider2000]

Palin replied to a casual question.

Given the smarmy cultural condescension which greets her in the press, she should have commenced by stating the obvious that Revere warned Americans.

But what Palin said -- albeit inelegant -- was correct.

Revere was not a traitor for warning the Brits. His own words suggest he was telling Brits to look out for a mobilization.

Meanwhile, Obama said "teutonic" rather than "tectonic," and signed "2008" instead of 2011, and the press excused those as brief slips in vast brainpower.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Palin replied to a casual question.

Given the smarmy cultural condescension which greets her in the press, she should have commenced by stating the obvious that Revere warned Americans.

But what Palin said -- albeit inelegant -- was correct.

Revere was not a traitor for warning the Brits. His own words suggest he was telling Brits to look out for a mobilization.

Meanwhile, Obama said "teutonic" rather than "tectonic," and signed "2008" instead of 2011, and the press excused those as brief slips in vast brainpower.

"technically kind of maybe correct" (according to the link the racist BusyShit provided) does not equal being right, no matter how much nuance or re-engineering you want to spin it with. What she said was still wrong.

Keep on deflecting this massive fail with some more past Obama gaffes. Whether negligible or not, it's a fun desperation game to play for the self-respect of a party and its main fappable prom queen princess, innit?

 

[Ishmael]

"technically kind of maybe correct" (according to the link the racist BusyShit provided) does not equal being right, no matter how much nuance or re-engineering you want to spin it with. What she said was still wrong.

Keep on deflecting this massive fail with some more past Obama gaffes. Whether negligible or not, it's a fun desperation game to play for the self-respect of a party and its main fappable prom queen princess, innit?

Ever read Reveres' memoirs? She was right, or Paul was lying. Take your pick.

Ishmael

 

[JenAltArmy]

obama is an epic fail! he's like charlie sheen

"technically kind of maybe correct" (according to the link the racist BusyShit provided) does not equal being right, no matter how much nuance or re-engineering you want to spin it with. What she said was still wrong.

Keep on deflecting this massive fail with some more past Obama gaffes. Whether negligible or not, it's a fun desperation game to play for the self-respect of a party and its main fappable prom queen princess, innit?