WeinerGate Twitter Hoax is Beginning to Unravel! I Told You Stupid Fucks!!!

[MeeMie]

The part where he says that Jon Stewart got it right--that his dick just isn't that big--was the best part. An American male is going to go on CNN to announce he has a small dick?

That was a riot!

I was thinking the same thing when Weiner was coming out with his one liners...

"I WISH that was a photo of mine"

"I was feeling a little stiff"

Here's me -> "Doesn't this guy realize that was a little tool?"

 

[Powertone]

The issue is not whether or not he's lying. It's to make you care whether he is lying or not. That's the scam. To smear the target in this case Weiner. Create a controversy and make them defend himself. It's the same hoax that was used against ACORN, Shirley Sherrod, and NPR, etc. Wild allegations from dubious sources which the lazy news fail to investigate. They just confront the accused, record their denial, and then speculate. How many times are you going to fall for this con?

the Kool-Aid has rusted what brain you have

 

[richard_daily]

Lying about weapons of mass destruction to start a war = ok

Lying about your cock = something to have congressional hearings about (unless you're a conservative who got caught with a male prostitute and meth, or molesting male pages, or who gets caught in a minneapolis airport bathroom propositioning a police officer, etc etc etc).

 

[MeeMie]

Lying about weapons of mass destruction to start a war = ok

Lying about your cock = something to have congressional hearings about (unless you're a conservative who got caught with a male prostitute and meth, or molesting male pages, or who gets caught in a minneapolis airport bathroom propositioning a police officer, etc etc etc).

Yeah, what happened to that guy?

 

[MeeMie]

Yeah. it was his staff that did it!

Weinier leaves all those menial tasks like Twitter to an army of staff ...



Weiner sent this photo to one of his young female fans after she asked for proof that it was actually the representative she was talking to.

 

[Joeybagadonuts]

You don't know what kind of underwear you wear? In what colors? You're not aware of whether or not you've ever taken pictures of your own dick? One morning you sign on and find out you photographed your own johnson without realizing it?

I wear boxer briefs, and I own them in three (3) colors and patterns. I can tell you in a glance if a picture includes my own underwear. If it does, I can tell you whether or not I've ever snapped a picture of my own dick.

I have.

^ See?

Consider the possibility that it's his underwear and he got caught using a sausage as a prop.

I just hope his embarrassment will serve to encourage others to be more honest, but I seriously doubt that.

 

[about_average]

I just hope his embarrassment will serve to encourage others to be more honest, but I seriously doubt that.

It should encourage them to quit using social media, but I doubt that also.
It's just too easy to spoof.

 

[MeeMie]

It should encourage them to quit using social media, but I doubt that also.
It's just too easy to spoof.

Yeah, like how Weiner provided his twitter staff all masks of himself so that they can convince your coeds that they were really him.

http://forum.literotica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1077433&d=1307368884

 

[Joeybagadonuts]

It should encourage them to quit using social media, but I doubt that also.
It's just too easy to spoof.

I knew some old time politicians who understood that enough shit would be made up about them and that they had to be cleaner than the Board of Health. They wouldn’t rent R rated movies from a video store for fear that there would be a record and it could be used against them. But more and more I see arrogance over ruling good judgment.

 

[bronzeage]

Yeah, what happened to that guy?

He was going to resign in disgrace, but the Republican leadership in the Senate convinced him there was a place in the party for a closeted gay man who cruises public restrooms for sex with strangers.

Apparently, being a Republican Senator is nothing like being married or enlisting in the Army.

 

[Karen Kraft]

I'm not making any guesses. I've never claimed Weiner innocence. I have no definitive opinion on the matter. What I don't do is form an opinion based on wild speculation based on accusations from dubious sources.

Pajamas Media is a joke. They are outfit that hired a working gay male prostitute as their White House correspondent. His only experience in journalism being a one weekend course at some right wing Christian college.

Here he is at work.

http://images.salon.com/news/feature/2005/02/10/gannon_affair/story.jpg

Here is is at work again.

http://www.queerty.com/wp/docs/2009/12/jeff-gannon.jpg

I understand he specializes military fetishes.

The second link is nothing but pure speculation. I prefer the information posted at Smoking Gun which is collecting actual facts and first hand interviews. No just dreaming up what might have happened.

He shouldn't work because he's gay?

Really?

* one eyebrow raised *

Or is it that your opinion of people's personal habits and lifestyles, conduct and misconduct, is all exclusively based upon your opinion of their politics. Hmmmm?

[ rhetorical question: no need to answer ]

 

[about_average]

He was going to resign in disgrace, but the Republican leadership in the Senate convinced him there was a place in the party for a closeted gay man who cruises public restrooms for sex with strangers.

If I'm not mistaken he was/is at the same time also a big proponent of anti-gay legislation.
Though I may be confusing him with one of the other male Republicans who enjoys sex with guys.
Which doesn't mean I oppose homosexuals being in congress. I oppose hypocrites being in Congress.

 

[bronzeage]

If I'm not mistaken he was/is at the same time also a big proponent of anti-gay legislation.
Though I may be confusing him with one of the other male Republicans who enjoys sex with guys.
Which doesn't mean I oppose homosexuals being in congress. I oppose hypocrites being in Congress.

I don't know if the Wyoming Senator had sponsored any anti-gay legislation, but he had signed on to the whole Republican family values package.

If the Republican leadership was certain his appointed replacement would be a Republican, they would have flushed him into the Potomac.

 

[Liar]

He shouldn't work because he's gay?

*facepalm*

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Exactly.

Why should any of us care what the guy's junk look like, right?

... or whether he's sloppy in his personal electronic communications?

And how is that any of your business, when you are not a voter from his district in NY? if he were a senator, you might have a leg to stand on. but he isn't. the only people who should have fuck all to complain about are his constituents.

I suggest you check out your local Learning Annex and see if they offer a basic civics course.

 

[Karen Kraft]

*facepalm*

Woman, minorities, and gay people have a right to be conservatives.
This is something conveniently ignored by the pro-terrorists.

 

[MeeMie]

He was going to resign in disgrace, but the Republican leadership in the Senate convinced him there was a place in the party for a closeted gay man who cruises public restrooms for sex with strangers.

Actually, Larry Craig announced his intention to resign from the Senate at a news conference on September 1, 2007, but later decided to finish the remainder of his term.

Craig denied any wrongdoing in the June 11 incident, in which an undercover police officer alleged Craig was making hand and foot gestures signaling he wanted to engage in sex. He tried to withdraw his plea agreement for "disorderly conduct", but was denied.

Craig and his lawyers claimed that the conservative senator was under extreme duress because the Idaho Statesman newspaper at the time was pursuing a separate story with new allegations of homosexuality.

"I will continue my effort to clear my name in the Senate Ethics Committee - something that is not possible if I am not serving in the Senate. When my term has expired, I will retire and not seek reelection. I hope this provides the certainty Idaho needs and deserves," Craig said.


Craig was not a candidate for re-election in 2008.

 

[MeeMie]

And how is that any of your business, when you are not a voter from his district in NY? if he were a senator, you might have a leg to stand on. but he isn't. the only people who should have fuck all to complain about are his constituents.

I suggest you check out your local Learning Annex and see if they offer a basic civics course.

Is there any sensible rationale in the above post?

What a member of the House does is nobody's business but his/her constituents; but a Senator is questionable?

Do they both not have a vote?

Are they both not serving office, making laws that govern the country, for THE PEOPLE of the United States?


I think it's you who need a lesson in civics.

 

[Powertone]

Anthony's Weiner getting roasted

make that burned to a crisp ~
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusiv...other-woman-provides-sex-messages-his-account

 

[bronzeage]

Actually, Larry Craig announced his intention to resign from the Senate at a news conference on September 1, 2007, but later decided to finish the remainder of his term.

Craig denied any wrongdoing in the June 11 incident, in which an undercover police officer alleged Craig was making hand and foot gestures signaling he wanted to engage in sex. He tried to withdraw his plea agreement for "disorderly conduct", but was denied.

Craig and his lawyers claimed that the conservative senator was under extreme duress because the Idaho Statesman newspaper at the time was pursuing a separate story with new allegations of homosexuality.

"I will continue my effort to clear my name in the Senate Ethics Committee - something that is not possible if I am not serving in the Senate. When my term has expired, I will retire and not seek reelection. I hope this provides the certainty Idaho needs and deserves," Craig said.


Craig was not a candidate for re-election in 2008.

So, you buy that story?

What would you do if a policeman accused you of soliciting sex in a public place, with no words spoken, only a foot tap under a toilet stall?

All he had to say was, "You're crazy. No such thing ever happened." The policeman has no evidence except his interpretation of "foot and hand gestures". Instead, he pleads to a "lesser charge" of disorderly conduct.

It's tough to be a closeted gay man in the Republican Party, but when they need a warm body to sit in the chair, they suddenly become very tolerant of alternative lifestyles.

 

[Liar]

Is there any sensible rationale in the above post?

What a member of the House does is nobody's business but his/her constituents; but a Senator is questionable?

Do they both not have a vote?

Are they both not serving office, making laws that govern the country, for THE PEOPLE of the United States?


I think it's you who need a lesson in civics.

They do. But they represent their district or state. It is up to the people in the district or state to say if they want them to keep representing them.

For the rest of us, there's only bitching on the Internet.

 

[MeeMie]

So, you buy that story?

What would you do if a policeman accused you of soliciting sex in a public place, with no words spoken, only a foot tap under a toilet stall?

All he had to say was, "You're crazy. No such thing ever happened." The policeman has no evidence except his interpretation of "foot and hand gestures". Instead, he pleads to a "lesser charge" of disorderly conduct.

It's tough to be a closeted gay man in the Republican Party, but when they need a warm body to sit in the chair, they suddenly become very tolerant of alternative lifestyles.

It's tough to be a gay man anywhere.... especially, a married one in the closet.

The wide stance story was well documented. If there was any more of an exchange, it's likely it too would have been reported.

Already explained in the previous post, he was avoiding another hatchet job in the press. He did try to have that plea agreement reversed, once the homosexuality accusations continued. By that point, he had nothing to lose, and no more embarrassment to he and his wife to avoid.

Truth be told, the Republican Party, including then President Bush, requested him to resign and save himself (and the party) another the blood bath.

 

[MeeMie]

They do. But they represent their district or state. It is up to the people in the district or state to say if they want them to keep representing them.

For the rest of us, there's only bitching on the Internet.

Yeah, no shit sherlock.

Take a look at her post again.

 

[Liar]

Yeah, no shit sherlock.

Take a look at her post again.

She wasn't all that precise with the representative v senator constituency comparison.

But you turning the argument into that they make policy for the whole nation was just as irrelevant.

 

[bronzeage]

It's tough to be a gay man anywhere.... especially, a married one in the closet.

The wide stance story was well documented. If there was any more of an exchange, it's likely it too would have been reported.

Already explained in the previous post, he was avoiding another hatchet job in the press. He did try to have that plea agreement reversed, once the homosexuality accusations continued. By that point, he had nothing to lose, and no more embarrassment to he and his wife to avoid.

Truth be told, the Republican Party, including then President Bush, requested him to resign and save himself (and the party) another the blood bath.

It is what it is. He was pressured to not resign because his vote was needed in the Senate.

The fact he tried to have the disorderly conduct reversed is irrelevant. Why plead guilty at all?

Put yourself in his place. A policeman stops you in a public restroom and claims you make gay gestures. What do you say to him?