WeinerGate Twitter Hoax is Beginning to Unravel! I Told You Stupid Fucks!!!

[Drixxx]

Did he run on family values? If so I agree.

If not, then he could have said "It's a private matter that doesn't affect what I was elected to do" and stayed. And I would have applauded him.

Weiner is not a family values guy. His image and selling point is being a Progressive rock star. He can easily say "It's a private matter that doesn't affect what I aws elected to do. Now stop asking me what my crotch looks like, you perverts." Even if he did it, it doesn't clash with hjis image of Progressice rock star.

What Republican doesn't run on family Values??? Even Newt Gingrich will run on family values. I only know of two don't. Rudy Giuliani and Arnold Schwarzenegger. Two of the nastiest marriages I've seen in politics.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/promos/politics/blog/05giuliani-cali533.jpg

 

[busybody..]

hey NIGGER

You should STFU

Cause you will become a BIGGER NIGGER then you already are

http://www.thedaily.com/page/2011/06/05/060511-news-weiner-1-4/

 

[busybody..]

Why dont you find new BAD GUYS to blame it on, K? NIGGER?

hey NIGGER


Yfrog confirms that e-mail upload feature “has not been compromised in any way”


Those providing on-line services take security very, very seriously, because any hint of vulnerability will have users running to competitors almost instantly in the highly competitive Internet world. When Rep. Anthony Weiner and his defenders began blaming Yfrog for a mysterious tweet on his stream that included a photo of a crotch that Weiner couldn’t say “with certitude” wasn’t his, Yfrog responded by suspending all e-mail uploads until it could fully check security. On Friday, Yfrog announced the results of its investigation:

After confirming that our email upload feature has not been compromised in any way – it is now active again (from 5 pm PST today). We appreciate your patience as we work to assure user safety and security. Please always maintain secure passwords and do not share email secret PINs with anyone.

Please contact us at is-support@imageshack.us with any questions, if you want your PINs changed or disabled.

Yfrog explains further:

At yfrog, we take security very seriously. We monitor all the activity on our site and network 24/7 to make sure we secure our services, especially the photos and videos of our users. Our commitment is to protect our users’ photos and make sure they are never lost, deleted by accident, or compromised in any way.

Email Upload Security Explained

The email upload feature was introduced as a convenience for users to send emails with their photos as attachments. The yfrog email PIN is given to the user for the sole purpose of uploading photos only to yfrog. As a private email PIN, it should be treated as confidential information, just like passwords.

To secure further, the user should:
•not share the email PIN with others.
•not include other recipients in the emails sent to yfrog to upload photos.
•not forward to other recipients the emails sent to the email PIN to upload photos to yfrog.

Why we Disabled Email Upload

At yfrog, we constantly evaluate our internal security mechanisms across all the facets of our service. Even though our email upload feature has not been compromised or broken into, we are taking this opportunity to evaluate the feature and secure it even further.

Security is Important to Us

Yfrog serves millions of users and over 2 billion requests worldwide every day with minimal or no attacks or disruptions. As we grow, we will continue to take every measure possible to secure our services so that our users’ photos and videos are protected.

In other words, one cannot upload photos to Yfrog with just a username, as some had alleged. Nor has Yfrog’s e-mail upload system been hacked or compromised. One might suspect from the quick and categorical conclusion to their probe that they may have some fairly convincing evidence of the origin of Rep. Weiner’s tweet and photo. If Weiner really is interested in getting to the bottom of this, he could ask Yfrog to release that information to the public, or at least send investigators to retrieve it and find the culprits.

Of course, a failure to do either makes it pretty clear that Weiner or someone he granted access to the account uploaded the picture and sent the tweet.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Yeah, here you go:

http://idiots4obama.blogspot.com/

http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/54/facepalm_implied.jpg

 

[busybody..]

http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/54/facepalm_implied.jpg

You have become a FULL FLEDGED NIGGER

Time to trot out you BIG DICK comments

 

[busybody..]

A BLONDE NIGGER our own DRIXXX NIGGER will love

Wasserman-Schultz on Weinergate: It's Okay, He's a Democrat



Earlier this week, DNC chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz told CNN that Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) is dealing with "a personal matter." That "personal matter" includes not knowing "with certitude" whether or not the, er, picture that was tweeted to a 21 year old college student belongs to the Congressman.




Well, that Debbie Wasserman-Schultz should really get acquainted with this Debbie Wasserman-Schultz:

This goes beyond Rep. Foley, it goes to the values of the Congressional leadership. These are not family values, these are not American values.

What was Wasserman-Schultz referring to in that 2006 quote? The behavior of Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL . . . are you watching those party labels?), who made advances towards 18 and 21 year old young men.


In fact, she went as far as to demand the resignation of then Speaker Denny Hastert for not addressing the Foley matter quickly enough:

What I've called for is an investigation to be completed within 10 days. And quite honestly, yes, I do think that Denny Hastert should resign . . . I‘d like to see the Republican caucus call upon their leadership, Speaker Hastert, Majority Leader Boehner, to get this resolved quickly. Do it before the election. And I haven‘t heard them say that. They‘re saying have the FBI investigate, have the House Ethics Committee investigate. They need to push their leadership to get this resolved so that they can move on, and we can make sure that we can restore the trust that they have shaken the public in Congress.

 

[coastal-boy]

http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/54/facepalm_implied.jpg

I just thought this needed quoted for posterity

 

[unregistered]

 

[Drixxx]

WEINER'S TALE UNRAVELING

The Daily learns tweet originated from app that pol used the night pic was posted

By Daniel Libit Sunday, June 5, 2011
As the world has attempted to make sense of Rep. Anthony Weiner’s claim that his Twitter account was hacked, a key clue has been missing: exactly how the notorious groin pic was posted online.

But according to data provided exclusively to The Daily from TweetCongress.org, a nonprofit website that captures each member of Congress’s Twitter feeds in real time, the shot seen round the world was transmitted using TweetDeck — a popular Adobe desktop application that links up with social networking sites. A review of Weiner’s Twitter stream from May 27, the day of the crotch pic, shows that Weiner had been posting only from TweetDeck — one of many ways to post messages to Twitter — that entire night.

Chet Wisniewski, a senior security adviser at security software company SophosLabs, said the TweetDeck stamp “does make it more plausible that it did come from him.” Bla bla bla....]

Thanks for the opinion piece from third parties with no first hand knowledge of the facts. Let us know when you come across anything that resembles actual news.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

I'm kinda wondering why I'm not seeing this story on other news sites...

According to Christopher Hitchens, politics is show business for ugly people. If Anthony Weiner is anything to go by, it seems more like high school for ugly people. As the story evolves, the logic seems to favor the blogger Ann Althouse’s explanation — that Weiner’s cavalcade of daily tweets are too droll to be written by him. He favors cute hashtags: For the Republican presidential field, “#TargetRichEnvironment”; for Newt Gingrich, upon entering the race, “#TallestPygmy.”

“So terribly clever and edgy,” writes Professor Althouse. “Why does a Congressman have time for that?” Her conclusion is that Weiner has a ghost-tweeter, and the ghost-tweeter uploaded the crotch shot, but that, because the “terribly clever and edgy” tweets are essential to Weiner’s sense of his own indispensability, he cannot admit that he’s lip-synching. It would be like Charlie Sheen confessing that it was a body-double under the bevy of hookers and suitcase of coke.

Between Occam’s Razor (it’s Weiner’s junk, and he tweeted it) and Occam’s Lip-Syncher (the ghost-tweeter did it) lies a third possibility — that the tweets aren’t by Weiner but the Twitpic crotch shot to the cute co-ed is. The republic’s “citizen-legislators” do hardly anything for themselves these days, starting with reading the thousand-page legislation they cheerily pass, but if they can’t even perform their own sex scandals there really is no point to them. For the last quarter of 2010, Weiner listed 19 staffers, a few with highly specific job descriptions (“Deputy Director of Immigration Affairs”) but most with the kind of blandly nebulous titles (“Staff Assistant”) that could cover almost anything, including in-house ghost-tweeting. For the sake of argument, let us take it as read that American men are e-mailing their genitals across the fruited plain all day long, and that in the nature of these things one or two attachments go awry and wind up in the inbox of the elderly spinster who runs the quilting bee and you have to make a rather sheepish apology. Congressmen are among the few in this land who, in such a situation, can breezily say, as Weiner did to CNN’s Dana Bash, “You have statements that my office has put out.” Herein lies the full horror of American politics in the death throes of the republic: A congressman has nothing better to do of an evening than tweet his crotch to coeds, but he requires an “office” with “staffers” to “put out” “statements” on the subject.

When Weiners have staffers, it’s very difficult to have limited government: You cannot have a small state run by big Weiners. If you require an “office” to issue “statements” about your tweets, it’s hardly surprising you’re indifferent to statist bloat elsewhere.

In the end, the congressman was not so “distracted” that he wasn’t able to vote to raise the debt limit. Confronted by his Twitpic, one is tempted to channel Mae West: Is that a debt-ceiling increase in your Fruit of the Looms or are you just pleased to see me? Alas for America, it’s both.

Mark Steyn
NRO

 

[Liar]

What Republican doesn't run on family Values??? Even Newt Gingrich will run on family values. I only know of two don't. Rudy Giuliani and Arnold Schwarzenegger. Two of the nastiest marriages I've seen in politics.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/promos/politics/blog/05giuliani-cali533.jpg

There's been a batch lately who have run on Tea Party mantras alone.

I don't think, for instance, Rand Paul has the "wholesome christian moral superiority" thing going for him. If he tweeted a cock or was caught with a mistress, I don't think it would kill his ethos. Some of his more traditionalist GOP voters would frown, of course, but it wouln't cost him all his political capital.

 

[bronzeage]

Yeah, here you go:

http://idiots4obama.blogspot.com/

idiots for obama.

Finally an unbiased reliable source of information.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

idiots for obama.

Finally an unbiased reliable source of information.

Something tells me Meems has that bookmarked and is the first site he checks in the mornings for all the latest info right after the horoscope.

 

[Powertone]

idiots for obama.

Finally an unbiased reliable source of information.

what ? huffington post and the new york times came online well before the outlet you cite as unbiased and reliable...

 

[bronzeage]

what ? huffington post and the new york times came online well before the outlet you cite as unbiased and reliable...

Are you really this fucking stupid?

 

[Powertone]

Are you really this fucking stupid?

no . but you're one dense motherfucker .

 

[Drixxx]

There's been a batch lately who have run on Tea Party mantras alone.

I don't think, for instance, Rand Paul has the "wholesome christian moral superiority" thing going for him. If he tweeted a cock or was caught with a mistress, I don't think it would kill his ethos. Some of his more traditionalist GOP voters would frown, of course, but it wouln't cost him all his political capital.

Don't be fooled. A right winger is a right winger. Tea Party or not.

Rand Paul To Address Ralph Reed's Religious Right Conference
Submitted by Brian on April 4, 2011 - 11:58am

Newly elected Kentucky Senator Rand Paul is set to address the Faith & Freedom Conference and Strategy Briefing in June, the hallmark event of Ralph Reed’s Faith and Freedom Coalition. Sen. Paul and his father, Texas Congressman Ron Paul, both appear to be testing the waters for a presidential bid. The younger Paul recently address the Iowa Republican Party’s “Night of the Rising Stars” and the Iowa Campaign for Freedom; he also told The Hill that he feels ready to run for president even though he has only held elected office since January.

Paul has also helped serve as a bridge between the Tea Party and the Religious Right, and conservatives were quick to defend him after he said he publicly opposed the Civil Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. In 2009 Paul headlined an event for the Constitution Party, which wants to establish “biblical law,” and his far-right positions have helped him win endorsements from prominent Religious Right figures like James Dobson and Beverly LaHaye.

During his Iowa speech, he said that politicians should refuse to compromise on the issue of abortion, connecting it to compromises on slavery laws prior to the Civil War. Earlier this year, he tried to connect his opposition to abortion rights to his battle against low flush toilets.

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/category/groups/faith-and-freedom-coalition

 

[Joeybagadonuts]

Drixx why do you think that he will not state with certitude that the pic is not him and didn’t come from his computer?

 

[Drixxx]

Drixx why doesn't Obama just release his birth certificate?

Fixed your post.

 

[Liar]

Drixx why do you think that he will not state with certitude that the pic is not him and didn’t come from his computer?

Joeybagadonuts do you think he lied when he stated with certitude that he did not send the tweet?

And if so, does it make sense that he lies about that but refuse to lie about whether the pic is his? Wouldn't it be easy to say "no, I don't recognise that picture"?

I'm not exhonerating him or anything. Just using the same rhetoric as you did.

 

[Sonny Limatina]

Fixed your post.

Obama could state with certitude that any birth certificate that said anything other than Hawaii was fake.

How do you not now whether that's a picture that you took of your own dick in your own underwear? If you never took one, you know. If you took some but that's not yours, you know.

Let's just say he was hacked and take that off the table. Why can't Weiner say that's not his dick?

 

[Liar]

How do you not now whether that's a picture that you took of your own dick in your own underwear? If you never took one, you know. If you took some but that's not yours, you know.

Possibly a private embarassment.

I guess you've never been that drunk?

He sees picture. Recognises it as probably his crotch, but can't remember taking it. But hey, there was that weird Vegas party last summer... memory is kind of sketchy.

 

[bronzeage]

Joeybagadonuts do you think he lied when he stated with certitude that he did not send the tweet?

And if so, does it make sense that he lies about that but refuse to lie about whether the pic is his? Wouldn't it be easy to say "no, I don't recognise that picture"?

I'm not exhonerating him or anything. Just using the same rhetoric as you did.

This is why sensible people still have questions.

A categorical denial from the beginning (That's not me and I don't know who it is or where it came from.) would either settle the matter, or bring out more information.

I have no doubt the New York Congressman who sent the barechest pic resigned, rather than have the 4 dozen other women who had his pics come forward, after he denied the whole thing.

Wiener looks like a man who is guilty, but not guilty of the exact charges. He is trying to walk the line of confirming what he did not do, while trying to conceal what he actually did.

If I were running for office, all kinds of pics might suddenly appear. I am not the shy type. It would be easy for someone to claim my pic showed up in his nieces email. If I were confronted with such a picture and asked if it was me, all I could say would be, "Maybe, I've never actually seen it from that angle."

 

[Drixxx]

Obama could state with certitude that any birth certificate that said anything other than Hawaii was fake.

How do you not now whether that's a picture that you took of your own dick in your own underwear? If you never took one, you know. If you took some but that's not yours, you know.

Let's just say he was hacked and take that off the table. Why can't Weiner say that's not his dick?

Why do you have a hard time taking him at his word? He said he doesn't know. Case closed.

What? You want to reopen the case? What's your evidence? Oh yeah. We're back to the "What some guy on the internet said" who turns out to be a smut peddling, drunk driving, girl friend beating, tax dodger.

 

[Sonny Limatina]

Why do you have a hard time taking him at his word? He said he doesn't know. Case closed.

What? You want to reopen the case? What's your evidence? Oh yeah. We're back to the "What some guy on the internet said" who turns out to be a smut peddling, drunk driving, girl friend beating, tax dodger.

If your wife ever asks you if you've ever cheated, you go ahead and tell her that you can't say with certitude that you haven't, thinking that's the same as saying no.

Me, I'll stick with "no."