[[Material prohibited per our forum guidelines.]]

[Grimfalcon]

[Material prohibited per our forum guidelines.]

 

[muppiethesecond]

.....

 

[Grimfalcon]

Well, that was quick.
I realize that, and I’m not trying to promote it in any way, shape or form, or draw people into raunchy discussion about personal desires or experiences. I only throw out some thought provoking information from an abstract point of view in a taboo subject area. The Mods are welcome to yank it if deemed necessary.

 

[muppiethesecond]

.....

 

[ecclectic]

disgusting fantasy, tantamount to rape.

human hybrid stuff is a different story entirely, but not my thing either.

 

[Stella_Omega]

supernatural and fantasy critters are fantasies. Puppy and animal play as it's currently being popularised much NOT about real animals, it's about being human with animal personality traits-- they tend to pick and choose iwhich parts they want to incorporate-- something real animals can't do, of course.

I once read that something like 40% of rural, American teens have experimented with bestiality. Pretty high percentage, and that’s only the ones that admitted it. A much higher percentage admitted to having fantasies, but never acted on them. I guess it’s not very surprising, since we’ve been bombarded with it since we were kids. Like I said before, the entire notion of saying ‘bestiality is bad,’ thusly illegal, seems pretty hypocritical since we immerse ourselves in the hinted fog of it nearly every day, openly accepting it, or calling it a forbidden romance at the box office. There seems to be more then enough people that wish it weren’t illegal, from my perspective.

First of all, google might help you track down that 40% number. It wouldn't surprise me if it were the Onion-- which is of course satirical. Maybe not, but it wouldn't hurt for you to double check.

Secondly, I really wonder where you've noticed this "fog of it everyday."

 

[Corbal]

Animal fuckers....not taboo, just down right disgusting and wrong.

 

[ecclectic]

I once read that something like 40% of rural, American teens have experimented with bestiality. Pretty high percentage, and that’s only the ones that admitted it. A much higher percentage admitted to having fantasies, but never acted on them. I guess it’s not very surprising, since we’ve been bombarded with it since we were kids. Like I said before, the entire notion of saying ‘bestiality is bad,’ thusly illegal, seems pretty hypocritical since we immerse ourselves in the hinted fog of it nearly every day, openly accepting it, or calling it a forbidden romance at the box office. There seems to be more then enough people that wish it weren’t illegal, from my perspective.

I call bullshit. Maybe incest, but not bestiality.

Up until recently (a few years ago) it was legal in Washington state (or at least, not illegal) till some guy got split open by a horse.

 

[muppiethesecond]

.....

 

[Grimfalcon]

[Material prohibited per our forum guidelines.]

 

[MyWife78]

Hmmm...tough one!

Humans always like to try things that are unconventional, taboo by another name...its been in our nature since we started thinking...lol.

Like it was said above...opinions on it varies as much as we vary from each other...

Some dont like it...others do...

Is it rape if the animal is doing the deed and isnt forced? Is the animal intelligent within our limits of reason?

Who knows really?

This thread shouldnt go for long...we'll all get into trouble discussing a banned topic.

But, all said, its all upto the individual...you and me...

Oh, also, even if I was into it I would decry you here because the topic was banned...so, your post replies must be taken with salt, as it were!

Lol!

Peace out!

 

[hellsgate]

As long as it isn't forced, I'd be into seeing a woman being "knotted" by a dog.

 

[MyWife78]

As long as it isn't forced, I'd be into seeing a woman being "knotted" by a dog.

Have read that that is awesome! Seen a clip or two about it long ago. Same:awesome!

 

[hellsgate]

Would love to see your wife or another busty lady being filled with doggie cum, as she begs her "lover" to knock her up.

 

[Grimfalcon]

I’m not into it personally as suggested, only trying to make a point. This topic can be debated like any other controversial topic for years, with pros and cons for both.
I’ll admit that I have seen videos of different acts in the past, and found in curiously morbid like any other sexual topic of question: incest, rape or forced sex, G/L, ect.

My entire point of starting this thread was for people to stop and examine their environment, and see just how prevalent it really is, without even realizing it.

How many of you watch the primetime cartoon series ‘Family Guy?’ Brian is an intelligent, talking dog, yet he has a pretty blonde girlfriend, and they show them in bed or talk about having sex all the time. He’s always hitting on Lois or some other woman during various episodes. The writers/ producers skirt around the issue, turning it into an acceptable joke, yet throw it in our face by sanitizing the truth about it, by giving an animal human traits to make it acceptable. Plenty of other examples out there as well, if you take the time to stop and look.

Makes me wonder one day if it will become as acceptable as interracial relationships and same-sex marriage, the way we’re being slowly conditioned into accepting it. Both those examples were the ultimate taboo not more then fifty years ago, although generally accepted for the most part now. (And no, before anyone jumps to conclusions, I'm not comparing the morality of either of those two subjects to Beast, nor am I raciest or against homosexuality. To each his own, as far as I’m concerned, just using those two as a particular example.)

 

[Corbal]

It’s all a matter of perspective; there’s plenty of sexual fetishes out there that you my find appealing, while others call disgusting and immoral. Not trying to say your belief is wrong, I'm not here to judge anyone, just trying to make a thought pervoking argument.

All of my kinks include consenting adults.

I typically don't judge anyone for their sexual kinks but no matter what you say to defend your stance, at the end of the day it is rape. You speak of perspective. Try cramming an elephants cock in your ass and tell me your perspective then.

 

[geronimo_appleby]

All of my kinks include consenting adults.

I typically don't judge anyone for their sexual kinks but no matter what you say to defend your stance, at the end of the day it is rape. You speak of perspective. Try cramming an elephants cock in your ass and tell me your perspective then.

emotional.

 

[Corbal]

Would love to see your wife or another busty lady being filled with doggie cum, as she begs her "lover" to knock her up.

You're proof you can't fix stupid.

 

[Grimfalcon]

All of my kinks include consenting adults.

As do my kinks. Don’t assume that just because I’m taking an impartial and perspective view, while playing the devil’s advocate on a sensitive topic, that I’m defending it or approve of it in any way.

I typically don't judge anyone for their sexual kinks but no matter what you say to defend your stance, at the end of the day it is rape. You speak of perspective. Try cramming an elephants cock in your ass and tell me your perspective then.

I must have missed something here… I’m curious how you took anything I said out of context and attributed it to rape, either by or to an animal? That has nothing to do with the point of the discussion.

Emotional indeed... If you have some sort of underlying personal issue with the subject then fine, I can respect that, but it’s no reason for making an immature and unwarranted comment like telling me to stuff an elephant cock up my ass. It never cases to amaze me how brave some people can be from behind a computer screen.

Was wondering if someone could fill me in on how to wrap the originally posted tag with persons screen name on it into a reply? I’m doing something wrong in the process. Thanks

 

[Corbal]

emotional.

As do my kinks. Don’t assume that just because I’m taking an impartial and perspective view, while playing the devil’s advocate on a sensitive topic, that I’m defending it or approve of it in any way.
I must have missed something here… I’m curious how you took anything I said out of context and attributed it to rape, either by or to an animal? That has nothing to do with the point of the discussion.
Emotional indeed... If you have some sort of underlying personal issue with the subject then fine, I can respect that, but it’s no reason for making an immature and unwarranted comment like telling me to stuff an elephant cock up my ass. It never cases to amaze me how brave some people can be from behind a computer screen.
Was wondering if someone could fill me in on how to wrap the originally posted tag with persons screen name on it into a reply? I’m doing something wrong in the process. Thanks

You're assuming I assumed you're into bestiality

Follow the posts. I answered your original question, you commented, I replied. This is how a conversation goes.

The elephant cock was a joke. Note the funny little Laugh a little, FFS.

 

[gagginforit]

Ok, ok... I may have shagged a sheep once or twice but it's practically a rite of passage for men in New Zealand, everyone does it.

And I'm not planning to do it again after that last time, it got a bit gross. She was cute enough but she had daggs which isn't very ladylike really.

 

[parker77]

this thread is bullshit and needs to go. just an excuse to try to talk about something banned here. somebody put this thing outta its misery!!!!

 

[Grimfalcon]

this thread is bullshit and needs to go. just an excuse to try to talk about something banned here. somebody put this thing outta its misery!!!!

I agree, it's gone on long enough. I never meant this thread to take the course that it did. I’ll be speaking with a Moderator about having it removed.

 

[Very_Bad_Man]

. Try cramming an elephants cock in your ass and tell me your perspective then.

you had me at hello

 

[evesdream]

A recent story about Florida "Inadvertently Outlawing Sex" in the phrasing of its anti-bestiality legislation had me thinking about this. I already posted about it elsewhere, pls excuse the c&p. I had to wonder why it took about 3 years for this legislation to pass and looked at some alternative points of view about it.

One person's argument says that animals "can and do consent to sex when they are sexually mature, adult mammals" (Sounds like a stretch, huh? "Dogs need pleasure too" zoo sexuality activist thinks it's not always rape.)

The other argument brings up the shady line of non-consent that already exists between humans and the rest of the animal kingdom. This person said "And what exactly DO animals consent to that humans do to them every day without it? Funny, we never needed consent before now for killing animals for hamburgers, racing, being killed for sport, trophies, in fact there is absolutely nothing animals have ever consented to or which humans have sought consent FOR." (Arguing that anti-bestiality laws are hypocritical, and possibly have little to do with anti-cruelty after all.)

Food for thought. No pun intended.