Luk
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2007
- Posts
- 32,404
The issue isn't the level of discourse. It's the impossible to follow editing, viz:
Awe.Some.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The issue isn't the level of discourse. It's the impossible to follow editing, viz:
HAHAHAHA! Oh please, Ish, you don't like it when women think because that's a threat to you. Get over it. I do think and I draw conclusions that are a threat to your opinion and how you see the world. Insulting my intelligence is not going to stop that. What I suggest to you, Ish, is to think. Think about the world and maybe think that there's more to it than maybe your little narrow portion of it.
Eyer, when YOU understand what REAL socialism and REAL capitalism then I'll discuss it with you. You obviously don't.
I'm waiting for your self-proclaimed mastery, but...
...could you leave out the sexist insecurity and just specifically address the subjects you claim to know so much about?
Thanx...
And I'm waiting for yours.
What I see is blind faith in the Ayn Rand way of thinking.
A lot of conservatives around here seem to have adopted that.
You seem to have no knowledge of the ways which Ayn Rand's concept of capitalism has been proven to be flawed.
Barry Goldwater was the "conservative", but even he pussed out and bailed before the election.
Barry Goldwater was the "conservative", but even he pussed out and bailed before the election. Since him, all others who tag themselves "conservative" are simply socialists who really love golf.
I believe "the Ayn Rand of thinking" to hold grievous flaws
So this illustrates what? LOL. I was going to post this very same fucking cartoon as an argument against socialism as an anachronism from the Victorian age. But it's so much better that Irezumi reveals that idiots clinging to their manifestoes and guns still exist in the back allies of San Francisco and the slums of the Upper East Side. heh.
Socialism is just plain old Marxist class warfare theory from the 19th century? Good luck with that, dude. Didn't work the first 100 times around, hey, doesn't mean it won't work on the 101th time tried, eh?
Why do people who cling to discredited Victorian theories based upon class envy and hate call themselves progressive? That's fucking Orwellian. Be honest, at least to yourself.
You're a paleo-Marxist fantasist.
Sing-a-long now, Comrades!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suVB3YGIUk0&feature=related
I believe "the Ayn Rand of thinking" to hold grievous flaws.
"So in your eyes, anything criticizing 'glorious' capitalism is automatically "socialist" or "marxist". "
LOL. No, Richard. I didn't say that. You did.
I said this picture is a very accurate cartoon of socialist ideology as laid out in Das Kapital by Karl Marx. Maybe, you ought to read it some time. It's a classic.![]()
Here I fixed for you. Makes more sense now.
http://i1000.photobucket.com/albums/af126/rastatropic/old%20girlfriends/pyramidcap2a.jpg
Cute edit, Lust. Made me chuckle. Have you posted your definition of socialism yet? I can't recall SEEING one from you.
So basically, anyone who isn't a 'real conservative' is a 'socialist', which is the crux of this entire thread... You use the term to insult without any real knowledge or understanding of the words that you use.
So you can't answer the question then...
Cute edit, Lust. Made me chuckle. Have you posted your definition of socialism yet? I can't recall seeing one from you.
ADHD, eh?
I've read an extremely detailed book about the Goldwater campaign and I recall nothing about him pussing out and bailing before the election.
So basically, anyone who isn't a 'real conservative' is a 'socialist', which is the crux of this entire thread... You use the term to insult without any real knowledge or understanding of the words that you use.
Really? I haven't seen that yet. Show me were you discussed those flaws.
I'd like to see what those flaws are in your view.
And I haven't evaluated YOUR philosophy yet because I have yet to see it.
Eyer, when YOU understand what REAL socialism and REAL capitalism then I'll discuss it with you. You obviously don't.
And I'm not threaten by Ayn Rand at all. I'm just tired of hearing people talk about her like she's the patron saint of economics when her version of economics has the potential to destroy the country.
I'll add something valuable to the conversation once I see something that's a real discussion.
I have yet to see anyone post anything in this thread that really supports the idea that liberals want to make this a socialist society.