Narcissists will be very unhappy.

Pure

Fiel a Verdad
Joined
Dec 20, 2001
Posts
15,135
Besides constructing new disorders--there are now three times as many compared to the 1950s-- psychologist and psychiatrists, eliminate or so to say, deconstruct, some of the old ones.

Newer recognized disorders are 'hypoactive sexual desire disorder'--prevalent in women who keep saying, 'not interested'-- pathological gambling, and school avoidant disorder in children. Older ones (DSM-1) are, for example, homosexuality, and inadequate personality.

One of the newest candidates for disorder, i.e. not yet included, is "internet addiction disorder" or its most common subtype, internet porn addiction. Another is "pathological bias", i.e. extreme, nutso racism.

Obviously some of the changes are for the better. On others the jury is out.


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/30/health/views/30mind.html
A Fate That Narcissists Will Hate: Being Ignored

By CHARLES ZANOR
Published: November 29, 2010


Narcissists, much to the surprise of many experts, are in the process of becoming an endangered species.


Not that they face imminent extinction — it’s a fate much worse than that. They will still be around, but they will be ignored.
The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (due out in 2013, and known as DSM-5) has eliminated five of the 10 personality disorders that are listed in the current edition.

Narcissistic personality disorder is the most well-known of the five, and its absence has caused the most stir in professional circles.
Most nonprofessionals have a pretty good sense of what narcissism means, but the formal definition is more precise than the dictionary meaning of the term.

Our everyday picture of a narcissist is that of someone who is very self-involved — the conversation is always about them. While this characterization does apply to people with narcissistic personality disorder, it is too broad. There are many people who are completely self-absorbed who would not qualify for a diagnosis of N.P.D.
The central requirement for N.P.D. is a special kind of self-absorption: a grandiose sense of self, a serious miscalculation of one’s abilities and potential that is often accompanied by fantasies of greatness. It is the difference between two high school baseball players of moderate ability: one is absolutely convinced he’ll be a major-league player, the other is hoping for a college scholarship.

==
One of the sharpest critics of the DSM committee on personality disorders is a Harvard psychiatrist, Dr. John Gunderson, an old lion in the field of personality disorders and the person who led the personality disorders committee for the current manual.
[...]

He ... blamed a so-called dimensional approach, which is a method of diagnosing personality disorders that is new to the DSM. It consists of making an overall, general diagnosis of personality disorder for a given patient, and then selecting particular traits [e.g. manipulative, grandiose ideas of self, etc.] from a long list in order to best describe that specific patient.

This is in contrast to the prototype approach that has been used for the past 30 years: the narcissistic syndrome is defined by a cluster of related traits, and the clinician matches patients to that profile.
 
Last edited:
Pathology by committee (and big pharm) instead of science.
 
Interesting choice to be axed by researchers vs. clinicians. If you've ever known someone with NPD, it's as recognizable thereafter as the flu is.
 
Psychiatrists have to draw attention to their "profession" somehow. They can't spend every day doodling behind a clipboard and asking, "How does that make you feel?" whenever they hear a break in the rambling.

"C'mon, boys! Let's go relabel the nuts."
 
The central requirement for N.P.D. is a special kind of self-absorption: a grandiose sense of self, a serious miscalculation of one’s abilities and potential that is often accompanied by fantasies of greatness. It is the difference between two high school baseball players of moderate ability: one is absolutely convinced he’ll be a major-league player, the other is hoping for a college scholarship.

It is also the exact description of liberal/progressive elitists.
 
The gold standard for any disorder is whether the disorder creates the major problems in your life. Does it get you fired, divorced, bankrupt, thrown out of school, tossed in jail-nut house-emergency room, beat-up, etc.

IE, it it doesnt get you locked up or locked out, it likely isnt a disorder.

Too many 'experts' do too much navel gazing, and totally ignore the existential outcomes of behavior and emotions.
 
Psychiatrists have to draw attention to their "profession" somehow. They can't spend every day doodling behind a clipboard and asking, "How does that make you feel?" whenever they hear a break in the rambling.

"C'mon, boys! Let's go relabel the nuts."

They only label what insurance pays for. Insurance drives all of the name changes. If your insurance wont pay for it, I guarantee you cant catch it even if you bathe in it and stick it up your ass every day.
 
Back
Top