The Annual Stella Awards

jomar

chillin
Joined
Nov 7, 2006
Posts
27,551
It's time again for the annual 'Stella Awards'! No, not THAT Stella.

For those unfamiliar with these awards, they are named after 81-year-old Stella Liebeck who spilled hot coffee on herself and successfully sued the McDonald's in New Mexico , where she purchased coffee. You remember, she took the lid off the coffee and put it between her knees while she was driving. Who would ever think one could get burned doing that, right? That's right; these are awards for the most outlandish lawsuits and verdicts in the U.S. You know, the kinds of cases that make you scratch your head. So keep your head scratcher handy.
Here are the Stellas for the past year:


*SEVENTH PLACE*


Kathleen Robertson of Austin, Texas was awarded $80,000 by a jury
of her peers after breaking her ankle tripping over a toddler who
was running inside a furniture store. The store owners were understandably
surprised by the verdict, considering the running toddler was her own son.

Start scratching!


* SIXTH PLACE *


Carl Truman, 19, of Los Angeles , California won $74,000
plus medical expenses when his neighbor ran over his hand with a
Honda Accord. Truman apparently didn't notice there was someone at
the wheel of the car when he was trying to steal his neighbor's hubcaps.


Scratch some more...


* FIFTH PLACE *


Terrence Dickson, of Bristol , Pennsylvania , who was leaving a
house he had just burglarized by way of the garage. . Unfortunately
for Dickson, the automatic garage door opener malfunctioned and he could
not get the garage door to open. Worse, he couldn't re-enter the
house because the door connecting the garage to the house locked
when Dickson pulled it shut.. Forced to sit for eight, count 'em, EIGHT
days and survive on a case of Pepsi and a large bag of dry dog food, he
sued the homeowner's insurance company claiming undue mental
Anguish. Amazingly, the jury said the insurance company must pay
Dickson $500,000 for his anguish.. We should all have this kind of anguish.
Keep scratching. There are more...

Double hand scratching after this one...


*FOURTH PLACE*


Jerry Williams, of Little Rock, Arkansas, garnered 4th Place in
the Stella's when he was awarded $14,500 plus medical expenses after
being bitten on the butt by his next door neighbor's beagle - even though
the beagle was on a chain in its owner's fenced yard. Williams did not get
as much as he asked for because the jury believed the beagle might
have been provoked at the time of the butt bite because Williams had
climbed over the fence into the yard and repeatedly shot the dog with a pellet gun.

Pick a new spot to scratch, you're getting a bald spot..


* THIRD PLACE *

Amber Carson of Lancaster, Pennsylvania because a jury ordered a
Philadelphia restaurant to pay her $113,500 after she slipped on a spilled
soft drink and broke her tailbone. The reason the soft drink was on the
floor: Ms. Carson had thrown it at her boyfriend 30 seconds earlier
during an argument. What ever happened to people being responsible for
their own actions?

Only two more so ease up on the scratching....


*SECOND PLACE*


Kara Walton, of Claymont , Delaware sued the owner of a
night club in a nearby city because she fell from the bathroom
window to the floor, knocking out her two front teeth. Even though Ms.
Walton was trying to sneak through the ladies room window to avoid paying
the $3.50 cover charge, the jury said the night club had to pay her
$12,000....oh, yeah, plus dental expenses. Go figure.



Ok. Here we go!!


* FIRST PLACE *


This year's runaway First Place Stella Award winner was:
Mrs. Merv Grazinski, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, who purchased new
32-foot Winnebago motor home. On her first trip home, from an OU football
game, having driven on to the freeway, she set the cruise control at
70 mph and calmly left the driver's seat to go to the back of the
Winnebago to make herself a sandwich. Not surprisingly, the motor home
left the freeway, crashed and overturned. Also not surprisingly, Mrs.
Grazinski sued Winnebago for not putting in the owner's manual that
she couldn't actually leave the driver's seat while the cruise control was
set.. The Oklahoma jury awarded her, are you sitting down?

$1,750,000 PLUS a new motor home. Winnebago actually changed their
manuals as a result of this suit, just in case Mrs. Grazinski has any
relatives who might also buy a motor home.


:eek:
 
I can beat those, easy.

A local man in prison for murder sued the victim's estate for $500K. The victim ran an ad in the paper to sell his classic antique pickup. The killer responded to the ad, forced the victim to sign the title, then killed him and took the truck. The killer was caught, got life in prison, and the estate reclaimed the stolen truck. The killer then sued the estate for the value of the vehicle.
 
Snopes.com has this one dated 2001.

http://www.snopes.com/legal/lawsuits.asp

A list of more of these fabricated cases;
http://www.caoc.com/CA/index.cfm?event=showPage&pg=isstort

The real facts (yet again) about the MacDonald's Scalding case;
http://www.caoc.com/CA/index.cfm?event=showPage&pg=facts
Urban myths like the "Stella Awards" aren't just cute or harmless jabs at trial lawyers and our legal system. They clearly are part of a massive disinformation campaign designed to undermine Americans' confidence in our legal system and to benefit powerful corporate interests at the expense of average people harmed by corporate wrongdoing and indifference. (http://www.caoc.com/CA/index.cfm?event=showPage&pg=facts)
 
Last edited:
The version I read of the one with the Winnebago involved a Russian immigrant who thought the cruise control was "auto pilot" but same outcome.

They're fun to read, but based on emails of these I've received in the past, I knew they were false.

Thanks for the smile though. :)
 
Oh what's the fun in not passing on the hysteria? ;) Snopes is a public website!
And I'm sure all of your friends will think of checking, just like Jomar did. Because they know not to trust your word.

I think that knowingly passing lies along without saying they are fiction is disgusting and immoral, personally. And also in cases like this one, you're playing right into the hands of people who want to keep the citizens in a state of stupidity.

That's just my opinion, mind you. Yours may vary.
 
And I'm sure all of your friends will think of checking, just like Jomar did. Because they know not to trust your word.

I think that knowingly passing lies along without saying they are fiction is disgusting and immoral, personally. And also in cases like this one, you're playing right into the hands of people who want to keep the citizens in a state of stupidity.

That's just my opinion, mind you. Yours may vary.


You could really stand to lighten up. Here, have some ice cream!


http://diabeticdietsnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/ice-cream-diabetics.jpg
 
Perpetually sending out this email is akin to passing around the news story that Aids can be spread by kissing.
 
But aren't all myths and legends based in reality on some real event or person?

And yes the system is even more broken than even we can discern. :(

People see an accident, even one caused by themselves, as a jackpot to garner themselves an easy lifestyle from someone else's pockets.

(No this is not a political statement) :mad:
 
You could really stand to lighten up. Here, have some ice cream!
]
No, I don't think I can, really. Half of this nation makes a glory out of stupidity and sees ignorance as some kind of godly virtue, and can't tell the difference, evidently, between fiction and lies-- and all it takes to get a lie passed on is that it be written cute.

Doesn't that scare you? If it doesn't, why doesn't it?

ETA; oh fuck, selena answered my question;
I mean, really, Stella... even if they're fictional examples, the reality is the system is broken. Judgments like this actually DO happen. More often that we'd like to imagine. Someone wouldn't have made them up if there wasn't truth to the argument.
Ooookay...

That's... amazing. And kind of horrifying. You are falling for the classic lie; "If it's in print it's gotta be true"

And guess who wants you to think this?

Limiting legal rights for all is the goal of circulating these make-believe cases. Lawsuit urban myths and phony awards, like the Stella Awards, are simply a tool used to shake the public's faith in the civil justice system.
http://www.caoc.com/CA/index.cfm?event=showPage&pg=isstort#fake
Who benefits if we lose our faith in the law system? Who doesn't get sued? the big corporations, that's who.

Go find some true examples. They will all be a matter of public record. Pass those around. Don't pass around the fakes.
 
Last edited:
No, I don't think I can, really. Half of this nation makes a glory out of stupidity and sees ignorance as some kind of godly virtue, and can't tell the difference, evidently, between fiction and lies-- and all it takes to get a lie passed on is that it be written cute.

Doesn't that scare you? If it doesn't, why doesn't it?

ETA; oh fuck you answered my question;
Ooookay...

That's... amazing. And kind of horrifying. You are falling for the classic lie; "If it's in print it's gotta be true"

And guess who wants you to think this?

Who benefits if we lose our faith in the law system? Who doesn't get sued? the big corporations, that's who.

Go find some true examples. They will all be a matter of public record. Pass those around. Don't pass around the fakes.

*sigh*
 
Here, I'll do it for you;

True examples of frivolous lawsuits

And lets not forget the most glaring example of a bullshit frivolous lawsuit in the news recently;

Defense Of Marriage (self-named) against human rights.

On the other hand, if we lose the ability to bring tort cases against corporations, here's who gets the goods;

Insurance companies

Stockbrokers

The drug companies

This is the true breakdown of the justice system. This law
is the kind of thing that your list of lies was written for.
 
I'm not going to cater to the lowest common denominator because other people are stupid. It amused me, in a train-wreck/satire sort of way, so I passed it on. No different than The Onion, really. So scary it could be true - and even if these specific examples aren't factual, as Stella noted, there are lots that are.

Is it any less "true" because the facts aren't correct? Meh. I don't think so.

But clearly we differ here and I will now bow out of the discussion. Continue as you wish. ;)
 
I'm not going to cater to the lowest common denominator because other people are stupid.
YOU DID.
It amused me, in a train-wreck/satire sort of way, so I passed it on. No different than The Onion, really. So scary it could be true - and even if these specific examples aren't factual, as Stella noted, there are lots that are.
In other words, you can't tell the difference between satire and lies.

The Onion is satire.

The lawsuit email is a lie.

It is unfactual in every way.

I can tell that you haven't bothered to look at my link to the true examples, or you would have seen that almost all of them were thrown out of court.
Is it any less "true" because the facts aren't correct? Meh. I don't think so.
:eek::eek::eek::eek:
But clearly we differ here and I will now bow out of the discussion. Continue as you wish. ;)
This discussion has been terrifying, saddening, and nauseating. I hate being so forcibly reminded that the jerk of the knee is the law of the land.
 
You should have put this on DG's 'Humor' thread. Jomar ol' buddy.

Mmmmmmm...ice cream. :D
 
Yeah, who'd a thunk it would trigger such intense response.
The idea that anyone would think it was worth repeating after the facts showed how bogus it is?

Someone would actually say that even though it is all lies that doesn't mean it isn't true? And they think that's reasonable?

Oh, My. Motherfucking God.

That's disgusting. It's damaging, and degrading and dishonors our civilisation.
 
The idea that anyone would think it was worth repeating after the facts showed how bogus it is?

Someone would actually say that even though it is all lies that doesn't mean it isn't true? And they think that's reasonable?

Oh, My. Motherfucking God.

That's disgusting. It's damaging, and degrading and dishonors our civilisation.

Wow. You're way over the top on this.
 
No, I think she's right. We've got enough legal chicanery in this nation without exaggerating it. What you should really be showing is those few law firms who rake in the dough by just threatening to sue small businesses. It's cheaper to pay them off ("settle out of court") than it is to defend yourself. I'm sorry to say that such defendants are too chicken-hearted to counter-sue for extortion but perhaps that wouldn't really work. I think it should . . . :cool:
 
Back
Top