What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?

[jeninflorida]

Typing it more slowly did improve your spelling and grammar somewhat. Unfortunately it did your metaphor no good at all. It's almost as fitting as the Michelle Antoinette comparison, which is to say not fitting at all. At least not in the manner which you intended.

Unless you see the economy as the Exxon Valdez and the "mountains" as the climb from -6% growth to nearly 3% growth in GDP.

That's some disaster!

okay, so next year when we are still in the obama disaster....will you still be sucking down the juice or wake up and say....obama sucks?

obama has no plan, no future...unless you belive in total government control

 

[jeninflorida]

460,000




That was going to be a GOOD number???

Yikes!

PLEASE 460,000 is less than 500,000, and really when you think about it, what's another 460,000 unemployed

I love how obama can and the left wing and spin 460,000 as a good number

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

okay, so next year when we are still in the obama disaster....will you still be sucking down the juice or wake up and say....obama sucks?

obama has no plan, no future...unless you belive in total government control

As long as his 401K looks good and his orders are up (even if its because of decreased competition) then there is no economic problems when it comes to U_D defending a Democrat administration.

If this were McCain/Palin he would be beside himself screaming at the stupidity of the rw neocon Christians and that STUPID woman whose every move would be an indictment and a call for impeachment.

 

[jeninflorida]

As long as his 401K looks good and his orders are up (even if its because of decreased competition) then there is no economic problems when it comes to U_D defending a Democrat administration.

If this were McCain/Palin he would be beside himself screaming at the stupidity of the rw neocon Christians and that STUPID woman whose every move would be an indictment and a call for impeachment.

yep, most of the wing nuts are just crazy

why do poeple follow the party lines, and not demand "good" leadership?

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

yep, most of the wing nuts are just crazy

why do poeple follow the party lines, and not demand "good" leadership?

They don't follow party lines.

They follow the consensus and the morality of their government education.

 

[jeninflorida]

They don't follow party lines.

They follow the consensus and the morality of their government education.

yes, but clearly obama has no morals...or ethics

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

... wait for it...

Been waiting for a year now.. What's the statute of Limitations here? Will you declare that you were right when the next recession hits in 10 years or so?

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

As long as his 401K looks good and his orders are up (even if its because of decreased competition) then there is no economic problems when it comes to U_D defending a Democrat administration.

If this were McCain/Palin he would be beside himself screaming at the stupidity of the rw neocon Christians and that STUPID woman whose every move would be an indictment and a call for impeachment.

Odds are McCain wouldn't have done anything differently than President Obama has. And gods forbid, if some knee jerk Libertarian wanna-be (Bawahahahaha! Like that's ever going to happen) had won, (You know, in some alternate universe where reality has bowed down to Randian utopian fantasy), the calls for massive social cuts would have driven those out of work to desperation with no assistance in sight.

Now take that second paragraph and substitute a Obama/Biden for McCain/Palin and "libruls" for "Neocon Christian and you're looking right at a mirror Cap'n.

 

[jeninflorida]

Palin does have her days where she looks hot. Biden, well he's just an ass.

are you dreaming about McCain? should have/would have/could have....

Odds are McCain wouldn't have done anything differently than President Obama has. And gods forbid, if some knee jerk Libertarian wanna-be (Bawahahahaha! Like that's ever going to happen) had won, (You know, in some alternate universe where reality has bowed down to Randian utopian fantasy), the calls for massive social cuts would have driven those out of work to desperation with no assistance in sight.

Now take that second paragraph and substitute a Obama/Biden for McCain/Palin and "libruls" for "Neocon Christian and you're looking right at a mirror Cap'n.

 

[mercury14]

Odds are McCain wouldn't have done anything differently than President Obama has.

Exactly.

 

[eyer]

But the question for me concerning UD and you, 14, is if McCain had been elected and everything else remains the same, why do I think your defensive "arguments" for President Obama wouldn't be "there" for President McCain?

I do know why...so why do you two proclaim you're objective when that political shoe is on those other feet?

The political games boys and girls play. pretending they're pundits when they're simply hacks...

 

[mercury14]

But the question for me concerning UD and you, 14, is if McCain had been elected and everything else remains the same, why do I think your defensive "arguments" for President Obama wouldn't be "there" for President McCain?

I do know why...so why do you two proclaim you're objective when that political shoe is on those other feet?

The political games boys and girls play. pretending they're pundits when they're simply hacks...

Did I attack Bush for his stimulus/bailout plans? No, I did not.

So why do you think I'd attack McCain's stimulus?

 

[Slowlane]

Odds are McCain wouldn't have done anything differently than President Obama has. And gods forbid, if some knee jerk Libertarian wanna-be (Bawahahahaha! Like that's ever going to happen) had won, (You know, in some alternate universe where reality has bowed down to Randian utopian fantasy), the calls for massive social cuts would have driven those out of work to desperation with no assistance in sight.

Now take that second paragraph and substitute a Obama/Biden for McCain/Palin and "libruls" for "Neocon Christian and you're looking right at a mirror Cap'n.

Why did you work so hard for Obama if there wasn't any difference? Wouldn't it have been better to say, "it doesn't make any difference", and go have another beer?

The biggest difference was that McCain's half-assed ideas were a lot cheaper than Obama's half-assed ideas. McCain also had plans to follow Bush's lead in the war. Obama didn't. He did anyway, but that isn't really the point.

 

[jeninflorida]

Odds are McCain wouldn't have done anything differently than President Obama has. And gods forbid, if some knee jerk Libertarian wanna-be (Bawahahahaha! Like that's ever going to happen) had won, (You know, in some alternate universe where reality has bowed down to Randian utopian fantasy), the calls for massive social cuts would have driven those out of work to desperation with no assistance in sight.

Now take that second paragraph and substitute a Obama/Biden for McCain/Palin and "libruls" for "Neocon Christian and you're looking right at a mirror Cap'n.

If you were a man, maybe your feelings wouldn’t have been hurt….suck it up little man and grow a set

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

If you were a man, maybe your feelings wouldn’t have been hurt….suck it up little man and grow a set

My feelings were hurt? When was that exactly?

Your repertoire seems to be rather limited when faced with an argument you have no way to rebut. All that was missing was the insistence that I'm terminally unemployed, on the public dole, or a government worker of some sort.

I didn't use too many big words there for you did I Jen? I can limit my vocabulary to two syllables or less if it will make things easier for you.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Why did you work so hard for Obama if there wasn't any difference? Wouldn't it have been better to say, "it doesn't make any difference", and go have another beer?

The biggest difference was that McCain's half-assed ideas were a lot cheaper than Obama's half-assed ideas. McCain also had plans to follow Bush's lead in the war. Obama didn't. He did anyway, but that isn't really the point.

I worked hard for Obama? Voting for the man wasn't too much of an exertion for me. There is a difference, just not on the way he would have dealt with the economy.

I'll leave the beer drinking to you, I rarely drink, but when I do it's liquor not piss water.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Did I attack Bush for his stimulus/bailout plans? No, I did not.

So why do you think I'd attack McCain's stimulus?

Honestly it was the only thing Bush did right after the year of denial. In the end even his own economists knew that they had fucked over the economy.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Luk]

What has Obama done right?

Got elected you ignorant fuck.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

What has Obama done right?

Well we can start with kicking the shit out of your Presidential wanna-be and Caribou Barbie..

Then we can move on to taking the economy from the -6% growth rate when he took office to a positive growth rate nearing 3%.

Health care reform, Wall Street reform, Campaign finance reform..

He's accomplished many of the things he said that he was going to. But I'm sure in your opinion nothing he's done has been right.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Been waiting for a year now.. What's the statute of Limitations here? Will you declare that you were right when the next recession hits in 10 years or so?

You do know that when you open up that can of worms, we can easily say the same thing about the payoff to Obama's looting of the future treasury...

What's the statute of limitations on the recovery?

A Lost Decade?

The Fall of the Vietnam Memorial Wall?