Bad punditry = Good romance writing? "Liberals Hate Palin Because She's Beautiful"

[Trudy_Antone]

*****

 

[Carnevil9]

You know what terrifies us in the rest of the world?

It's the fact that you're 'the super power' yet education is a joke and the collective intellectual reasoning of the masses is around about the IQ level of the retarded.......

Okay, then riddle me this, braniac: If we are so uneducated and retarded in the US of A, then just how did we get to be the Super Power that so terrifies you? How exactly did we beat out the superior education and non-retards of your own enlightened and intellectual nation?

Dumbass.

 

[Stella_Omega]

Quod est demonstrandum, thank you Carnevil.

 

[Carnevil9]

Non sequitor.

See, I can sound smart, too!

Edited to add: It's "quod erat demonstrandum." Dumbass.

 

[xssve]

Non sequitor.

See, I can sound smart, too!

Edited to add: It's "quod erat demonstrandum." Dumbass.

No, no not really.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Which liberals, Box? Who?

They do? Where? I just checked the website.

Again, Box, which liberals?

Website? Study? Poll? Anything other than your warped views?

Your ridiculous blanket statements are so fucked up. Infantile.

I haven't seen you post much since zoot explained the facts of life.

I suppose it was too much to ask that you would have actually learned something.

At any rate, this liberal hopes she'll run.

It would be so fun to watch.

I don't feel the need to prove that water is wet and runs downhill or any of the other things that are common knowledge. If you question whether or not Libs. hate Sarah Palin, read the comments on this thread and on othrs about her.

As for the post by Zoot you refer to, I hoped he would have the intellectual capacity to see what I meant in the post of mine he referred to. That he didn't was rather disappointing.

 

[JackLuis]

Left wing progressive liberal twats....-
Amicus

Whoa! an LWPLT in the first sentence. You are on your form tonight Ami.

I support freedom of speech and I believe that letting Sarah Palin speak is the greatest service we can do for our nation. By letting her speak we can judge the "trutieness" of her statements.

She is her own worst enemy so let her blather.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Originally Posted by Boxlicker101
This might be a reference to NOW or similar groups. They say that women should be all they can be, and should control their own destinies, etc., and the way to do this is to do and say exactly what NOW tells them to do and say.

They do? Where? I just checked the website.

Okay, here are two statments made by NOW. These are from their own sites.

http://www.now.org/history/purpos66.html

http://www.now.org/organization/conference/1998/vision98.html

The first one was at the time or their organization, and says they should be all they can be. The second is from 1998 and says all women should control their destiny.

We know how they feel about women being "objectified" in beauty pageants, and they rail against them, although some women want to be objectified. They say women should rise to the top of the power structure, but disregard the fact that many women are content to raise children and go to PTA meetings.

Basically, I agree that women, and men too, should be all that they can be, if they want to, and they should control their own destinies. All I am saying is that NOW has no business nattering away at individuals and telling them how to live their lives, if they are doing what they want and it is legal. No one else has that right either.

 

[Boxlicker101]

You know what terrifies us in the rest of the world?

It's the fact that you're 'the super power' yet education is a joke and the collective intellectual reasoning of the masses is around about the IQ level of the retarded. (No offense intended to IHC people). Just watch a Palin rally and listen to the supporters! And for those of you with actual brain power...well, you're just following your political beliefs and you have to justify the candidates you're given to carry out your agendas.

As to her beauty??? Stella had it right. Beauty comes from within and Palin's ideas are what uglifies her.

And finally, Box... With much respect for your different POV, saying that she's disliked because she birthed a Downs Syndrome Baby has to be the most twisted, hateful thing I've read here. Freedom of choice - which she exercised, and bloody kudos to her - does not mean babies should be put down for their frailties and deformities. Anti-abortion propaganda, surely you're better than that?

This is what I said: Liberals dislike the idea of hunting and that SP carried her Downs Syndrome baby to term, because it sets a bad example.

Libs are generally pro-choice, as am I, and SP showed her opposition to abortion by refusing to abort the fetus she carried, even though the baby would be mentally handicapped. If she had asked me, I would have recommended an abortion, as would most people, even those who dislike the idea of abortions. However, she went ahead and carried the fetus to term, flaunting her choice very publicly in the face of Libs, which is what they dislike.

 

[Stella_Omega]

Pro choice.

It does not mean what you think it means, Box.

Pro Choice does NOT mean "Forcing women to have abortions," not even for Downs syndrome babies.

I read an article today... made me think of you.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Non sequitor.

See, I can sound smart, too!

Edited to add: It's "quod erat demonstrandum." Dumbass.

*yawn* Yew wants a medal or a t-shoit, mac?

http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/comment/39/2010/06/43b4b4157235486cc32cd45f2886cd9f/original.gif

 

[Trudy_Antone]

*****

 

[amicus]

Fer Christsake Truant one, you should be embarrassed at exposing your intellectual snobbery around this place, especially when you have so little to expose.

You want a true reflection of the liberal medium? Look at the 92 percent of the Black vote that the Left Wing Obama received...less than half graduated high school and the ones that did, did so by taking athletics and a soft schedule.

The lip service paid the middle class at election time only, is just that, a ploy, since the left intellectual elite look down upon anyone who uses his hands to earn a living.

To the lower class working stiffs, welfare mothers, black and hispanic food stamp recipients, you buy their votes with promises of more goodies paid for by the working class and government parasites.

"Yes," said the annointed one, "Electricity prices will skyrocket..." Read all energy prices gasoline, heating oil, natural gas as the left wing eco weenies are bound and determined to starve half the population, the only way alternative sources of energy would meet the minimum demands of a rural society.

Adlai Stevenson in the 50's was the last left wing intellectual to take a stab at politics and he was laughed off the stage. Funny thing about left wingers, like Kennedy and Clinton, they can't seem to keep their zippers closed, both married(oh, my god...vows and such).

Palin, Bachman and now Haley are all conservative Republican women who are changing the face of modern day politics as all the up and coming men are either gay or have been otherwise emasculated and dysfunctional in terms of performance criteria.

Babykillers & Buttfuckers make up the majority of the far left...just what kind of a future do you see arising there?

Such a deal!

Amicus

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Fer Christsake Truant one, you should be embarrassed at exposing your intellectual snobbery around this place, especially when you have so little to expose.

You want a true reflection of the liberal medium? Look at the 92 percent of the Black vote that the Left Wing Obama received...less than half graduated high school and the ones that did, did so by taking athletics and a soft schedule.

Prove it, you antiquated impotent fuck. Or does the thought of anyone different than you and yours who can do everything you used to do better than you scare the strained prunes out of your colon when they get together and become a better force to do something than anything your nutseed is related to could do?

 

[Boxlicker101]

Pro choice.

It does not mean what you think it means, Box.

Pro Choice does NOT mean "Forcing women to have abortions," not even for Downs syndrome babies.

I read an article today... made me think of you.

I know as well as you what "pro-choice" means. And, Libs believe Sarah Palin made the wrong choice, and made it very publicly, thereby inspiring other women to make the same choice. If one of my granddaughters were to come to me and say: "Lolo, I'm pregnant and the baby will have Down's Syndrome. What should I do?" I would advise her to get an abortion, but I would tell her it was her own choice. Hopefully, this will not happen.

 

[Huckleman2000]

I know as well as you what "pro-choice" means. And, Libs believe Sarah Palin made the wrong choice, and made it very publicly, thereby inspiring other women to make the same choice. If one of my granddaughters were to come to me and say: "Lolo, I'm pregnant and the baby will have Down's Syndrome. What should I do?" I would advise her to get an abortion, but I would tell her it was her own choice. Hopefully, this will not happen.

Again, Box: your explanations only make it worse.

Her Downs baby isn't a prop, or a symbol, or a flashpoint of controversy - he's a little boy. She is the one who makes him some sort of issue by carrying him around everywhere, or having her young daughter carry him around, parading them in front of the cameras. Her biggest concern for him seems to be how he makes her look in the eyes of her adoring fans.

 

[Stella_Omega]

I know as well as you what "pro-choice" means. And, Libs believe Sarah Palin made the wrong choice, and made it very publicly, thereby inspiring other women to make the same choice. If one of my granddaughters were to come to me and say: "Lolo, I'm pregnant and the baby will have Down's Syndrome. What should I do?" I would advise her to get an abortion, but I would tell her it was her own choice. Hopefully, this will not happen.

No, you stupid old fuck, she DID NOT MAKE THE WRONG CHOICE.

There is NO RIGHT OR WRONG CHOICE.

That is what CHOICE means.

Edited to add: It's "quod erat demonstrandum." Dumbass.

You went and looked it up, how smart of you! You've just proven that you know that you don't know shit.
Much, much better than being too stupid to know that you're stupid.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101
I know as well as you what "pro-choice" means. And, Libs believe Sarah Palin made the wrong choice, and made it very publicly, thereby inspiring other women to make the same choice. If one of my granddaughters were to come to me and say: "Lolo, I'm pregnant and the baby will have Down's Syndrome. What should I do?" I would advise her to get an abortion, but I would tell her it was her own choice. Hopefully, this will not happen.

No, you stupid old fuck, she DID NOT MAKE THE WRONG CHOICE.

There is NO RIGHT OR WRONG CHOICE.

That is what CHOICE means.You went and looked it up, how smart of you! You've just proven that you know that you don't know shit.
Much, much better than being too stupid to know that you're stupid.

At no time did I say she made the wrong her choice. You are right, she made HER choice, for better or worse, and I would never say it was the wrong one. However, I suspect there are some Libs, especially women, who will contend she did make the wrong choice, because giving birth to a baby who will be handicapped is setting a bad precedent to other women.

What are you accusing me of looking up? Your post that I am citing had nothing that I would need to look up.

 

[JamesSD]

This might be a reference to NOW or similar groups. They say that women should be all they can be, and should control their own destinies, etc., and the way to do this is to do and say exactly what NOW tells them to do and say.

Do you really agree with nothing that was said? Liberals do strongly admire those who have degrees from Ivy League Uniersities, except W, who has an Ivy League MBA. Liberals dislike the idea of hunting and that SP carried her Downs Syndrome baby to term, because it sets a bad example. They also dislike her for the reasons given in the second paragraph. Hate might be too strong a word, but they strongly dislike the woman for those reasons.

I'm really sad that you drank the kool-aid. Honestly I always thought you were a rational, moderate conservative.

Liberals hate Sarah Palin because we hate her policies. We hate that she's considered a legitimate political candidate despite limited political qualifications and experience. We hate that she's jingoistic and a panderer of the worst kind. Like Glenn Beck's (character), she's a proud anti-intellectual. You're right that most liberals don't like how pro-hunting she is, which at least is sort of a policy disagreement (although there are plenty of liberals in the middle of the country who hunt).

Being Pro-Choice is about CHOICE. Most abortion supporters are happy that she made her own choice to keep her baby, rather than having the government choose for her.

It's easy to forget that Hillary Clinton was quite attractive when she was Palin's age. Same with Barbara Boxer. Liberals love beautiful women, especially those with substance.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

You went and looked it up, how smart of you! You've just proven that you know that you don't know shit.
Much, much better than being too stupid to know that you're stupid.

In your defense, you didn't say it wrong per sé, it just had a more proper way to say it. Still, you win for not having to internet search up what you wanted to say cuz you're erudite from jump street.

What are you accusing me of looking up? Your post that I am citing had nothing that I would need to look up.

She was replying to Carny's trying to be Good Will Hunting cute by having to look up something book-smart she said in Latin that he didn't know about until he Googled it. Your quoting her just mashed the two replies together since the bulletin board system here omits the double imbedded quotes of others one is replying to.

Ain't the internet fun?

 

[Stella_Omega]

I'm really sad that you drank the kool-aid. Honestly I always thought you were a rational, moderate conservative.

Liberals hate Sarah Palin because we hate her policies. We hate that she's considered a legitimate political candidate despite limited political qualifications and experience. We hate that she's jingoistic and a panderer of the worst kind. Like Glenn Beck's (character), she's a proud anti-intellectual. You're right that most liberals don't like how pro-hunting she is, which at least is sort of a policy disagreement (although there are plenty of liberals in the middle of the country who hunt).

Being Pro-Choice is about CHOICE. Most abortion supporters are happy that she made her own choice to keep her baby, rather than having the government choose for her.

It's easy to forget that Hillary Clinton was quite attractive when she was Palin's age. Same with Barbara Boxer. Liberals love beautiful women, especially those with substance.

Quoted for truth.

But Box has been irrational for a while now. is it his age?

In your defense, you didn't say it wrong per sé, it just had a more proper way to say it. Still, you win for not having to internet search up what you wanted to say cuz you're erudite from jump street.

I didn't bother to go double check because one mis-written word in a latin tag, once in a while, doesn't matter to me. To carney, of course, me getting it wrong is a welcome digression-- because he can't claim that he didn't just demonstrate the dim-bulb-bully mentality of so many Americans.

 

[amicus]

]I know as well as you what "pro-choice" means. And, Libs believe Sarah Palin made the wrong choice, and made it very publicly, thereby inspiring other women to make the same choice. If one of my granddaughters were to come to me and say: "Lolo, I'm pregnant and the baby will have Down's Syndrome. What should I do?" I would advise her to get an abortion, but I would tell her it was her own choice. Hopefully, this will not happen. [/[/I]QUOTE]

~~~

And were it possible, I would charge you as an accessory to premeditated murder.

With technology progressing as rapidly as it is in the Medical field, what if the child were female instead of male? Would you also advise killing the child for that reason?

What if, perchance, medical procedures could predict a child born blind, or deaf; would you butcher one for that reason also?

There is no 'Choice' when the question is a human life; one must morally act to preserve that life in every circumstance except when the life of the mother is at risk. And yes, before you ask, that includes rape and incest.

Human life is the fundamental value in all human actions; if you have no respect for human life, from the instant of conception forward, you have no values at all.

If you cannot figure what is right and what is wrong, go to a church of your choosing; they will excuse you from using your mind and you can just believe.

Amicus

 

[Boxlicker101]

I'm really sad that you drank the kool-aid. Honestly I always thought you were a rational, moderate conservative.

Liberals hate Sarah Palin because we hate her policies. We hate that she's considered a legitimate political candidate despite limited political qualifications and experience. We hate that she's jingoistic and a panderer of the worst kind. Like Glenn Beck's (character), she's a proud anti-intellectual. You're right that most liberals don't like how pro-hunting she is, which at least is sort of a policy disagreement (although there are plenty of liberals in the middle of the country who hunt).

Being Pro-Choice is about CHOICE. Most abortion supporters are happy that she made her own choice to keep her baby, rather than having the government choose for her.

It's easy to forget that Hillary Clinton was quite attractive when she was Palin's age. Same with Barbara Boxer. Liberals love beautiful women, especially those with substance.

I think of myself as a rational Libertarian. As such, I am in favor of personal freedom, which includes being pro-choice and having no opposition to gay people marrying and having the right to arm themselves for hunting or self-defense. I am also in favor of personal responsibility, which involves supporting yourself and your family as long as you can do so, and not having any family if you can't or won't support them.

Are you aware that Sarah Palin had 16 years in elected office, including executive experience as a mayor and governor. Obama had 11 years, all as a legislator.

Have you ever heard of Palin expressing the desire to invade another country or escalate a war anywhere? Do you know that Obama has escalated the American presence in Afghanistan and seems to be on the verge of bringing the war in Iraq to a successful conclusion. Those are not complaints, BTW.

Personally, I think Libs are the worst kinds of panderers, buying votes by dispensing welfare and other unearned benefits.

Palin is an educated woman; why would she be anti-intellectuals? Of course, there are some persons who hold degrees from Ivy League or other prestigious universities, and believe they are better than the hoi polloi, and believe this gives them the right to rule others. I think most people are opposed to them.

I know what pro-choice is, and I am pro-choice, but there are those who believe Palin sets a bad example by not aborting a fetus that will become a mentally retarded child.

I don't believe anybody is opposed to beautiful women, but there are some who believe beauty pageants are wrong, because they objectify women. Personally, I see no more wrong with a person using physical attributes than I see wrong with using talent or intelligence to succeed in life.

Do you know the source of the term "Jingoism?"

ETA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By_Jingo

You may notice it expresses a reluctance to fight, but a willingness to do so if necessary.

 

[Huckleman2000]

Another crush letter...

Susie Bright pens a fantasy for The Stranger's feature, Republicans I Have Fucked

"Drink up," Sarah winked. I took the moose carafe from her and sipped. The liquid was burning, strong, a touch oily, just like Sarah.

"There is strength in women's pain," Sarah said. "Heckity, there's money in it!"

Sarah's baby browns flashed as she pulled me close. I could smell her Bumpit. "Susie, let's do an abstinence pledge drive! We're PAC heroines! We must be the fetus voice of those who have no fetus voice!"

What a moment! What a woman! I gazed at her, dazzled, feeling something so strong—a feeling I couldn't quite name—and whispered, "Sarah, you're so, so... scary."

Sarah showed me all of her teeth. "There is safety in scariness, Susie." She locked and loaded her mouth against mine.

My head spun. The feeling was overreaching, consuming, unsustainable. "Oh, Sarah, Saraaaaaah!" My head fell back, my eyelids fluttered, my lips parted. My body shuddered deep inside and I convulsed in the most intense, overwhelming dry heave of my entire life.

 

[DeeZire]

Have you ever heard of Palin expressing the desire to invade another country or escalate a war anywhere?...

Yep. She thinks God wants her to spread Christianity and Democracy throughout the entire world. I'd go find the quote, but if it came from the Huff Post, you'd question the validity of the quote because of the source, even though sources like the Huff Post aren't allowed to make up fake quotes and attribute them to public figures.