Woman fired for being too hot?

Why does everyone assume the bitch is honest about what happened?
That is pretty much how Hispanic women dress, the younger ones - skintight tight jeans and tee shirts, it's like a uniform.

I don't mind, I'm gonna complain about little eye candy? Whatever.

I suspect Citi is the one not telling the truth, the managers wife probably came to go to lunch with him one day, and he did it to shut her the fuck up.
 
Couple of things: I was taught that if it shows any cleavage at all, it's too low-cut for work, and that heels, in a professional environment, should never be more than 2 inches. In those more conservative pics, she both showed cleavage and wore heels that were way too high. With respect to form-fitting clothes though, I was taught that if it shows camel toe or ass-crack, it's too tight. I don't think her pants or her skirts were too tight, and her skirts appeared to be an appropriate length for the office. The turtleneck...I didn't see anything wrong except that it looked way too uncomfortable.

But if she's telling the truth about what's happened then she tried to conform to all of their requests and requirements for her dress, and she just couldn't win no matter what.

So...truthfully, I don't know what my feelings on this are. There's not enough info in the article or the pics IMO.
 
That is pretty much how Hispanic women dress, the younger ones - skintight tight jeans and tee shirts, it's like a uniform.

I don't mind, I'm gonna complain about little eye candy? Whatever.

I suspect Citi is the one not telling the truth, the managers wife probably came to go to lunch with him one day, and he did it to shut her the fuck up.

In the bars maybe. I obviously associate with higher class Hispanics than you.
 
Couple of things: I was taught that if it shows any cleavage at all, it's too low-cut for work, and that heels, in a professional environment, should never be more than 2 inches. In those more conservative pics, she both showed cleavage and wore heels that were way too high. With respect to form-fitting clothes though, I was taught that if it shows camel toe or ass-crack, it's too tight. I don't think her pants or her skirts were too tight, and her skirts appeared to be an appropriate length for the office. The turtleneck...I didn't see anything wrong except that it looked way too uncomfortable.

But if she's telling the truth about what's happened then she tried to conform to all of their requests and requirements for her dress, and she just couldn't win no matter what.

So...truthfully, I don't know what my feelings on this are. There's not enough info in the article or the pics IMO.

Quite right! We need more pics! ;)
 
In the bars maybe. I obviously associate with higher class Hispanics than you.

The women still don't wanna fuck you, though. Just because Clint Eastwood pulled himself a Latina hottie at a ripe old age don't mean it works for old, obsolete caucasian codgers like yourself.
 
Nobody gets fired for being too hot. Unless she pole danced in the lobby and pressed the dress code and got written up too many times for wearing skimpy clothes. And refused to fuck the VP, of course...you know, her boss and all. But that would be totally wrong.
 
The women still don't wanna fuck you, though. Just because Clint Eastwood pulled himself a Latina hottie at a ripe old age don't mean it works for old, obsolete caucasian codgers like yourself.

SIMPLETON

You have no idea how much action I get from women. When I read your blabber I know you cant be talking about me, so you must be talking about YOU and the other simpletons of color.
 
SIMPLETON

You have no idea how much action I get from women. When I read your blabber I know you cant be talking about me, so you must be talking about YOU and the other simpletons of color.

Nursing home action don't count.
 
That is pretty much how Hispanic women dress, the younger ones - skintight tight jeans and tee shirts, it's like a uniform.
According to the article, she claims she wore more modest clothes than her, um, uglier co-workers.
 
Liar said:
Wasn't there an Ally McBeal episode about something like this, back in the days?

Find me an episode that wasn't about somthing like this.


I do find it amusing that the majority of the pictures of her are profile shots with her face turned or hidden. What, her face can't make her 'hot', too?
 
Last edited:
x

don.t worry with all the publicity playboy will offer her a big money deal next week, watch this space x:kiss:
 
Oh, and a heads up: hot pants appear to be "in" this summer with the Latina's - there was chick at the bowling alley the other night who required a certain amount of self discipline not to stare at. :eek:

She was really doin' 'em justice.
 
Not just latina's: if you' got it, flaunt it, so guys will have to make an effort not to look like drooling idiots.

Apparently, it's accompanied by a reciprocal tend, sack dresses, if you don't feel you got it - those are sexy too, on more voluptuous women, particularly the thinner cotton ones, like summer dresses, both concealing and revealing, very tantalizing.
 
Couple of things: I was taught that if it shows any cleavage at all, it's too low-cut for work, and that heels, in a professional environment, should never be more than 2 inches. In those more conservative pics, she both showed cleavage and wore heels that were way too high. With respect to form-fitting clothes though, I was taught that if it shows camel toe or ass-crack, it's too tight. I don't think her pants or her skirts were too tight, and her skirts appeared to be an appropriate length for the office. The turtleneck...I didn't see anything wrong except that it looked way too uncomfortable.

But if she's telling the truth about what's happened then she tried to conform to all of their requests and requirements for her dress, and she just couldn't win no matter what.

So...truthfully, I don't know what my feelings on this are. There's not enough info in the article or the pics IMO.
That sounds about right for a professional environment, the exception being those roving pharmaceutical salesgirls, who appear almost universally 18, and dressed in pencil skirts or skintight doubleknits, and heels, though no cleavage - that would "whorish", whereas the trick apparently, is to look like one without looking like one.

Casually, cleavage is all good, I can only complain about the women who act insulted when you do look.

Camel toe can signify very oppositional things: it can be a very feminismo thing, like those European women with thongs so tight you can see their clit rings poking out, and a confident attitude to match - which is actually easier to take than the more common receptivity signal, which is pure tease, and typically accompanied by a "what, who, me?" attitude, or the ever popular, deer-in-the-headlights look.

With he Feminisma's you know it going to be an even match up front, the femme's are more ambiguous - it signals receptivity, without necessarily promising the receptive part.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top