DHS Report: Number of Islamic Terror Attacks Against US at All-Time High…

busybody..

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 28, 2002
Posts
149,503
Wasnt the election of teh COLORED FOOL supposed to stop this shit?

Werent we told that they HATED Bush and would STOP when teh MUSLIM KENYAN COLORED FOOL was in office?

YES THEY DID:mad:

DHS Report: Number of Islamic Terror Attacks Against US at All-Time High…


But, but, but we elected Mr. Wonderful, he was supposed to heal the world with unicorns and rainbows, what happened?…

May 26, 2010 (ABC News)— The pace and number of attempted terror attacks against the U.S. over the past nine months has surpassed the number of attempts during any previous one-year period, according to an internal Department of Homeland Security report issued on Friday, May 21.

The report notes chillingly that while US officials “lack insights” they believe that “operatives are in the country and could advance plotting with little or no warning.”

The DHS “Intelligence Note,” a short, non-classified report, makes concrete the concerns of a number of homeland security experts who have discussed with ABC News the pace and nature of the individual attempts. The report notes that al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and the Pakistani Taliban have “expanded their focus” to include the United States.

Homeland Security and law enforcement officials interviewed by ABC News on the condition their names not be used are concerned that the pace will continue to ramp up and that increasingly the attackers will be difficult-to-detect homegrown extremists.

“Recent attempted attacks and plots in the United States progressed to an advanced stage largely because of these groups’ ability to use operatives that have access and familiarity with the U.S. and their employment of new and varied attack plans,” the three-page note concludes.

“Public statements highlighting group leaders’ intent to strike & and probable terrorist perception of success in challenging the U.S. even through failed attacks, suggest al Qaeda and associated groups will try to conduct operations in the United States with increased frequency.”

The attacks included the alleged May 1 attempt by Faisal Shahzad to detonate a car bomb in Times Square and the attempted Christmas Eve bombing of a Northwest Airlines Flight 253 by a suspect who managed to carry high powered explosives aboard the aircraft concealed in his underwear. In each attempt, U.S. intelligence failed to detect and prevent the attacks and it was only through failures in the construction of the improvised explosive devices that the attacks did not cause mass causalities.
 
Yet Big Sis is searching American farms and retirement homes for terrorism.

How does admitting to the threat of fundamentalist Islam advance the Democratic political agenda?

C'mon, you have to think these things through.

Whereas parading a militiaman through town is good for a news headline and a direct mail campaign letter.

Notice how long it took to admit the Times Square bomber might be an umm militant fundamentalist Muslim?
 
what really bugs me

so many in the media etc told us

and indeed on teh C Rose show, teh MUSLIM COLORED FOOL alsos said

the FACT he attended a MUSLIM school, his name, his color

would help us in the fight against terror and that he could better handle it!

WHERE ARE TEH QUESTIONS?
 
Dummy! "Us" means "Islam." "Fight against terror" means fight against US imperialism.
 
Defends Jihad as “Legitimate,” Claims Terrorists are “Victims of Economic Forces”…:rolleyes:


John “al-Quds” Brennan at it again. This is absolutely outrageous, the fact that someone this deranged, who defends jihadis as “victims,” is defending us from al-Qaeda sends shivers up my spine…

The president’s top counterterrorism adviser on Wednesday called jihad a “legitimate tenet of Islam,” arguing that the term “jihadists” should not be used to describe America’s enemies.

During a speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, John Brennan described violent extremists as victims of “political, economic and social forces,” but said that those plotting attacks on the United States should not be described in “religious terms.”

He repeated the administration argument that the enemy is not “terrorism,” because terrorism is a “tactic,” and not terror, because terror is a “state of mind” — though Brennan’s title, deputy national security adviser for counterterrorism and homeland security, includes the word “terrorism” in it. But then Brennan said that the word “jihad” should not be applied either.

“Nor do we describe our enemy as ‘jihadists’ or ‘Islamists’ because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam, meaning to purify oneself or one’s community, and there is nothing holy or legitimate or Islamic about murdering innocent men, women and children,” Brennan said.

The technical, broadest definition of jihad is a “struggle” in the name of Islam and the term does not connote “holy war” for all Muslims. However, jihad frequently connotes images of military combat or warfare, and some of the world’s most wanted terrorists including Usama bin Laden commonly use the word to call for war against the West.
 
By the way, if you see any somalis'.......well never mind that would be racial profiling.
 
Back
Top