Strikingly Unpresidential

You're a c&p moron. Nothing more, nothing less.

Your opinion of me is inconsequential.

Go get fucked up the ass without a condom, risk giving a woman some strange disease, post at liberty about it and then pretend again that it isn't really you that said that.
 
Your opinion of me is inconsequential.

Go get fucked up the ass without a condom, risk giving a woman some strange disease, post at liberty about it and then pretend again that it isn't really you that said that.


At least I have an opinion. You just C&P and call it your opinion. You're spoon-fed bowls of crap by right wing bloggers and Glenn Beck. Youre a parrot and an idiot who falls for his own party's lies.

Hint: they lie because they know they can fool you.
 
What I said exactly was...

"I couldn't care less about the opinions expressed regarding the United States by posters from other countries ... the UK ... Canada ... they're entitled to their opinions, but it's irrelevant noise, as far as I'm concerned."


And that still holds true.

This is a different issue. One discussing the inappropriateness of Obama's foreign relations expertise, and the embarrassment to the nation because of it.

Because I don't give a fiddler's fuck what you think doesn't mean that I don't cringe at the sight of Obama making a mockery of the Office of President of the United States.


Okay, now I'm curious. How is it that fiddlers fuck???
 
"Jonas Brothers are here, they're out there somewhere. Sasha and Malia are huge fans, but boys, don't get any ideas. Two words for you: predator drones. You will never see it coming. You think I'm joking?"
 
"Jonas Brothers are here, they're out there somewhere. Sasha and Malia are huge fans, but boys, don't get any ideas. Two words for you: predator drones. You will never see it coming. You think I'm joking?"

Will he prematurely declare them dead too?




;) ;)
 
Though he pretends to promote civility, evidence has surfaced thatPresident Obama has added "tea-bagger" to his public rhetoric, though it's considered a cheap shot and a tawdry insult to "tea party" activists.

Watchdogs at Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) barked when they saw the proof: Obama said that the unanimous House vote against the Recovery Act "set the tenor for the whole year. That helped to create the tea-baggers and empowered that whole wing of the Republican Party to where it now controls the agenda for the Republicans."

His "tea-baggers" remark is the equivalent of using the 'n' word.

It shows contempt for middle America, expressed knowingly, contemptuously, on purpose, and with a smirk. It is indefensible for a president to use this word. The president knows what it means, and his people know what it means.

"The public thought we reached a new low of incivility during the Clinton administration. Well, the Obama administration has just outdone them," said ATR president Grover Norquist.
 
Yes, I saw that:



http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/5105KV3c1dL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

The Manchurian President: Barack Obama's Ties to Communists, Socialists and Other Anti-American Extremists

The book uncovers a far-leftist, anti-American nexus that has been instrumental in not only helping build Obama's political career but in securing his presidency. Klein, with Brenda J. Elliott details with shocking precision how this nexus continues to influence Obama and the White House and is involved in drafting policy aimed at reshaping our country.

Highlights of The Manchurian President:

*Obama's mysterious college years unearthed

*Shocking new details of Obama's relationship with Bill Ayers and other Weathermen terrorists

*Obama's ties to Islam and black liberation theology

*Startling facts about Obama's eligibility to serve as president

*Obama's membership in a socialist party probed

*How Obama's "hope," "change" slogans stem from communist activism

*Radical socalists involved in drafting stimulus bill, ObamaCare

*Communists, socialists and other radicals on team Obama, including an expose on Obama's top guns in the White House

*Never-before-revealed depth of Obama's relationship with ACORN









Reviews:



The first few chapters are poignant, yet slow moving. The book really takes off in Chapter 4, when it begins to discuss in detail Obama's adoption of Saul Alinsky-type tactics, and his outright affiliation to socialist and communist PAC's and communal organizing non-profits. After reading, "The Manchurian President", you may still wonder how America could have possibly elected BHO, but you won't wonder why he acts like a marxist through his public policy. The truth is, he's been around marxism and socialism his entire life, and his policy reflects this stunning truth.





This book is a must for anyone trying to understand the leftward tilt of the Obama presidency. While he ran as a moderate, his roots in the radical left go back a long way and run deeply. With painstaking research, the authors begin to shed light on the aspects of President Obama's background that the administration and the left want to keep well hidden. The information in this book should have been available to the nation PRIOR to the 2008 election. Hopefully it comes in time to alert Americans to the danger the Obama presidency presents to our basic freedoms, and to the economic and social wellbeing of the nation.
 
Last edited:
This one, too:


http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41CVlULgXSL._SL500_AA300_.jpg


The Obama Timeline: From his Birth in 1961 Through his First 100 Days in Office

The Obama Timeline The complete timeline of the life of Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Obama, from his birth in 1961 through his first 100 days in the Oval Office.Here are the people and the events that shaped the life of Barack Obama . . . from his birth, through childhood in Hawaii and Indonesia, high school, college in California and New York, Harvard Law School, his community activism, his entry into Chicago politics, the U.S. Senate . . . and the election that may enable him to transform the United States of America into something unrecognizable. Intertwined with Obama's life is a cast of recurring characters-many of them unsavory-that the media chose to ignore but whose connections to him are described here in all their incriminating detail. No facts are left out and no rumors are left unexamined in this hard-hitting book. Here is the evidence that was kept from the voters when they were starving for information during one of the most important election campaigns in American history. This is a no holds barred timeline that will either confirm you were correct not to vote for the current temporary resident of the White House . . . or leave you wondering why you di





Reviews:
I read the material written by Mr. Fredrick which was well documented, complete with references found on-line, and gladly purchased the book to get the rest of the majority of the story of Barack Obama's life. I have to say that I could not put it down and I heartily recommend it to prospective readers interested in Barack Obama's life. This is a book that provides an unbelievable amount of information which essentially places Barack Obama in the proximity of Marxists, Socialists, and/or Communists throughout his entire life. This is the book to read if you feel that you want answers regarding who Obama has associated with, what he was like in schools, who mentored him, what he did while working as a community organizer for ACORN, what he did while working as an attorney, who he dealt with and how he dealt with those individuals politically, where he fits on the political spectrum with respect to his voting record, information regarding the issues concerning U.S. citizenship, and most poignantly, how the media and liberal Americans have essentially glossed over all of this information. It is clear to me that this book is well researched, footnoted and after reading it, you may be surprised by the overwhelmingly radical history of this President, and how such a politician was capable of winning the presidency of the United States.


The author has done a huge amount of research. The book is not meant for a quick read. You will learn about the people and events that shaped the life of Barack Obama. I recommend reviewing the extensive cross-index. Example: under Emanuel, Rahm you find 32 referenes. Good reading there. During ths campaign the salivating press did not disclose details about the record breaking fund raising activity which aultimately let the POTUS move ito the Whitehouse. The fund collected $668 Million Dollars. Some of that all-important cash came from questionable (make-believe) sources. Someone named Goodwill from Austin, Texas, donated hundreds of times. Another donor, identified as "Pro, Doodad" from Nando, NY. gave $19,500 in 786 separate donations, most of them for $15.00. Other donors gave names like Bart Simpson, Family Guy, Daffy Duck and King Kong.
 
MeeMie said:
The fund collected $668 Million Dollars. Some of that all-important cash came from questionable (make-believe) sources. Someone named Goodwill from Austin, Texas, donated hundreds of times. Another donor, identified as "Pro, Doodad" from Nando, NY. gave $19,500 in 786 separate donations, most of them for $15.00. Other donors gave names like Bart Simpson, Family Guy, Daffy Duck and King Kong.



They all registered and voted for him, too.
 
The review you never view...

Yes, I saw that:



http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/5105KV3c1dL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

The Manchurian President: Barack Obama's Ties to Communists, Socialists and Other Anti-American Extremists

The book uncovers a far-leftist, anti-American nexus that has been instrumental in not only helping build Obama's political career but in securing his presidency. Klein, with Brenda J. Elliott details with shocking precision how this nexus continues to influence Obama and the White House and is involved in drafting policy aimed at reshaping our country.

Highlights of The Manchurian President:

*Obama's mysterious college years unearthed

*Shocking new details of Obama's relationship with Bill Ayers and other Weathermen terrorists

*Obama's ties to Islam and black liberation theology

*Startling facts about Obama's eligibility to serve as president

*Obama's membership in a socialist party probed

*How Obama's "hope," "change" slogans stem from communist activism

*Radical socalists involved in drafting stimulus bill, ObamaCare

*Communists, socialists and other radicals on team Obama, including an expose on Obama's top guns in the White House

*Never-before-revealed depth of Obama's relationship with ACORN






Angry Journalists Refuse to Review Anti-Obama Book



One of the worst ways that the lack of ideological diversity in America's newsrooms shows forth is in the media's treatment of sensational accusations against the current president.


Oftentimes, explosive allegations against presidents are either untrue or drastically overstated: George W. Bush deliberately lying to get the U.S. to war so he can cash in or deliberately ignoring Hurricaine Katrina due to his hatred of black people (a la Kanye West), Bill Clinton's supposed involvment in the drug trade, truthers, so on and so forth. Journalists do the public a service by rebutting absurd conspiracy theories and wacko charges.


In recent memory, though, they have taken a much greater zeal toward stamping out allegations against Democrats, particularly President Obama, a stark contrast to the kidglove or even promotional attitude they took toward books by liberal authors alleging all sorts of anti-Bush absurdities.


World Net Daily-affiliated author Aaron Klein recently discovered this when he sent his new book, "The Manchurian President," to members of the media he hoped would review it. He got some very angry responses. Here are some of the more colorful ones:




"Never, ever contact me again,"
wrote Time Magazine senior writer Jeffrey Kluger.
(like that's a surprise)


"This is sensational rubbish that is of no interest to any legitimate publication."
Newsweek deputy editor Rana Foroohar quipped.


"Absolute crap,"
replied Evelyn Leopold, a Huffington Post contributor who served for 17 years as U.N. bureau chief for Reuters until recently.


"Remove me from your list."
Nancy Gibbs, editor-at-large for Newsweek, fired,
(another big surprise)


"seriously, get a life."
said David Knowles, AOL's political writer


Ben Wyskida, publicity director for The Nation, claimed Klein's book is "so offensive" and "so far afield."




Say what you will about this book's claims -- its sub-header claims to expose "Barack Obama's Ties to Communists, Socialists and Other Anti-American Extremists" -- but most of these reporters' publications had no such qualms reviewing, and occasionally endorsing, the far-left's radical anti-Bush claims during the last administration, even when they were backed by unreliable sources, or by no sources at all.


The Nation and the Huffington Post were perhaps more predictably hypocritical. Both jumped at the opportunity to bash the Bush administration for supposed misdeeds, even when the facts supporting those claims were sketchy at best.


Take Seymour Hersh's infamous 2007 New Yorker column, "The Redirection," which claimed that the United States was funneling money to terrorist groups. The story's most inflammatory charges were based on hearsay: Hersh heard it from another journalist, who had heard it from the founder of a decidedly anti-Bush organization, who had heard it "from all kinds of people."

Both HuffPo and the Nation touted Hersh's claims as fact, despite the exceptionally weak sourcing that undergirded his most damning claims.

Huffington Post contributor Scott Thill wrote that Hersh's column "is a fucking doozy, and not just because it boasts research deeper than Wikipedia."

"Hersh," Thill continued, "has uncovered how the Bush administration's strategic shifting in Iraq has betrayed both its motivations for invading the country, and how dependent they are on the economic influence of Saudi Arabia." He regurgitated a few more left-wing talking points about Bush and the Iraq war, and concluded that "support for this war, for this president, for this administration, is an implicit rubber-stamp for the murder of our own."

The Nation also trumpeted Hersh's dubious claims that the United States was indirectly funding terrorist groups as fact. Under the byline "The Nation," its website claimed the Bush administration was "running an updated version of Iran-Contra (without the CIA) out of the Vice President's office."

The more traditional news outlets that condemned Klein's book did not give such ringing endorsements to equally sketchy claims, but many of them came close, or at the very least reported on such misinformation rather than dismissing it outright.

Time Magazine, for instance, used J.H. Hatfield's thoroughly-debunked book "Fortunate Son" to fact-check -- and find factual -- parts of Oliver Stone's Bush-bashing movie "W". For those who don't remember, "Fortunate Son" alleged that Bush had been arrested for cocaine possession and had his record expunged upon his father's request. Publishers recalled most of the books when it became apparent that Hatfield had made up most of his claims.

Time also published a lengthy review of Kitty Kelley's salacious book, "Nancy Reagan: The Unauthorized Biography". Kelley's book, by Time's own account, "is so slanted that its credibility is called into question at every turn. She uses a variety of techniques that would not pass muster with most reputable news organizations."

Yet despite this admission, Time touts elements of the book that are, it claims, accurate or revealing:
"The book is exhaustively researched, packed with quotes (a surprising number of them with names attached), anecdotes and detail. To be sure, much of this is not new: Kelley mixes original quotes indiscriminately with recycled material from other books and articles, and fudges the notes at the end so the reader often cannot tell which is which. Still, much of the portrait -- Nancy's difficult relationship with her children, her obsessive attention to detail as a White House hostess -- rings true. Treated simply as a compendium of all the scraps a team of diligent researchers could gather about Nancy Reagan, it serves at least one historical function. It reveals that many, many people didn't like her."​
If Time was willing to sift through the sea of shoddy journalistic practices that comprised much of the book to find the "historical function" it serves, could't it have done the same with Klein's book?

To its credit, Newsweek declined a review of another Kelley book, "The Family," saying the magazine was not "comfortable with a lot of the reporting." That book claimed that George Bush had done cocaine at Camp David, and arranged an illegal abortion for an ex-girlfriend. Still, Newsweek's statement was a far cry from "sensational rubbish that is of no interest to any legitimate publication."


Taken together, these double standards reveal a liberal media paradigm that at least tolerates and discusses -- and occasionally endorses in strong terms -- unreliable and slanderous books that paint Republicans in less-than appealing terms, while rejecting out of hand any book that makes damning allegations about President Obama.



Really?

We hadn't noticed. :rolleyes:
 
Classy!

When President Obama was asked if he would play a round of golf with his talk-radio nemesis Rush Limbaugh, the response, relayed by a top Democrat, was: "Limbaugh can play with himself."


The caustic comeback is another example of the verbal venom between the White House and the conservative radio star.


What is wrong with Barack Obama?

Can you imagine George W. Bush carrying himself with such utter lack of decorum?

This guy is a real tool.
 
When President Obama was asked if he would play a round of golf with his talk-radio nemesis Rush Limbaugh, the response, relayed by a top Democrat, was: "Limbaugh can play with himself."


The caustic comeback is another example of the verbal venom between the White House and the conservative radio star.


What is wrong with Barack Obama?

Can you imagine George W. Bush carrying himself with such utter lack of decorum?

This guy is a real tool.
As per usual, you're mouth is wide open every time the right wing echo chamber posse is jerking off in your face. I hope you have a cleenex ready.
 
As per usual, you're mouth is wide open every time the right wing echo chamber posse is jerking off in your face. I hope you have a cleenex ready.



kleenex

Where does your splooge cum from? The HuffPo or MediaMatters?


The New York Post is hardly thought of as a right wing echo chamber posse:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/36789.html







Rush Responds to Obama’s “Limbaugh Can Play With Himself” Remark…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9HKv5nD688




It couldn't possibly be Obama who said that. Afterall, he is the President of the United States and would never resort to juvenile sexual innuendo against his opponents ... like calling the popular Tea Party movement "teabaggers" ... or chucking his middle finger at political opponents ... or making a veiled statement about "putting lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig" widely interpreted as a play on Sarah Palin’s joke during the Republican National Convention that "the only difference between a pit bull and a hockey mom was lipstick."

Yup. The Vermin-In-Chief has plenty of class. All of it low…












...
 
Last edited:
Okay, now I'm curious. How is it that fiddlers fuck???

I dated a fiddler for a while, and, if he was any example, he could make my toes curl. One of the best. Amazing stamina and finger action... So, the correlation is true. S/he probably couldn't give a fiddler's fuck.

From the tea party files. Sure would make me feel safe to be around them:

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/5496/slide_5496_74976_large.jpg

http://i.huffpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/5496/slide_5496_74978_large.jpg?1273785206882

http://i.huffpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/5496/slide_5496_74982_large.jpg?1273785292491

http://static.crooksandliars.com/files/uploads/2010/01/DaleRobertson_c6014.jpg This guy isn't even strong enough to spell it right, but he'll carry a sign.

http://fak3r.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/teabagthedems2.jpg

http://newsrealblog.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/tea-party.jpg
 
Thank you. Now if I can just figure out how drunk the fiddler's bitch is.
 
Back
Top