Two Masters?

I wonder if it could even be possible unless your Masters were in complete communication and compliance with one another...
 
given the kind of domination i need and crave, i'd have to say it would be completely impossible for me to serve two masters.

thankfully i don't need to consider it either as so far, Master is more than capable of giving me everything i need and more.
 
I'm owned by my Master and Mistress, who are a married couple. It's not hard at all.
 
I'm owned by my Master and Mistress, who are a married couple. It's not hard at all.

i'd be fascinated to find out the headspace of serving the way you do miss bunny. i'm sorry if that's intrusive or rude. i don't mean to be. it's just so completely outside anything i know and i'd love to understand better.
 
I serve two. I was just curious to know others opinions on this. My masters are both in constant communication. Its really easy and amazing to me.
 
I did for a while. Some times it was easy, some times it wasn't. Really depended if the second guy was an ass or not.

Jounar has been my primary for 4 years, but some guys just could not understand this and play by the rules. Giving a top rules was not something many of them liked, but the less they liked it, and the more fight they put up, the more restrictions Jounar added to the point where they'd disapear or I'd dump them because it just wasn't working.

He finally admitted he did this with the intent of getting rid of the guy. The more he thought the guy was an ass, the more restrictions. If the guy was decent enough he got full privilages with me.

*shrug*
 
i'd be fascinated to find out the headspace of serving the way you do miss bunny. i'm sorry if that's intrusive or rude. i don't mean to be. it's just so completely outside anything i know and i'd love to understand better.

No problem. ;)

I think a lot of people who believe that an arrangement with one sub/slave and two (or more!) dominants would be hard think that the dom/mes in question would act antagonistically toward one another, thereby putting the sub in the unenviable position of "Who am I going to obey?"

That kinda thing shouldn't happen if the mental age of the dominant parties is above roughly 12. :p If you want a sub who can serve to the best of his/her ability, you have to work cooperatively.

That's not to say I haven't received conflicting orders in the past, due to one half of my Owner-people not being aware of what the other half had told me to do. That's always cleared up with a quick "Master/Mistress actually told me to x."

We don't have a hierarchy of dominants or anything. Master's and Mistress's commands are equally important for me to follow. Generally, unless it's a really big deal, if one of them tells me to do x and the other tells me to do y, then once I point out the incongruity, I'm told to obey what the first person told me. (If that was confusing, I'll provide an example, LOL.)

But, yeah, my Owners have never engaged in a "Who's got the bigger dick?" contest between each other by giving me conflicting orders intentionally and seeing who I'd obey. I'd think something like that happening on a regular basis would end in neither dominant having a sub for terribly long.

As far as headspace, for me, it's 100% possible for me to be owned completely by more than one person. If you're an attention whore like me, you get twice the attention. If you're a masochist like me, you get twice the sadistic play. If you're a service pet like me, you get twice the opportunities to serve.

I don't know if I actually answered anything you were curious about because I was just babbling, so if you have questions, feel free to ask.

ETA, after reading wenchie's post: Admittedly, it's probably much easier for me, due to the fact that my Owners are married. There's no need for any establishment of rules or hierarchy. They view me as *theirs*, just like the dog is theirs and the house is theirs, and so they make any decisions concerning their property jointly.
 
Last edited:
thankyou ms bunny.

i do understand more after your explanation. figured the "married" factor kind of helped in the long run, but it helps alot to have someone explain it properly from their side.

thankyou again.
 
My Hubby is my primary relationship. He the Dominant in our marriage.
I also serve a Sadist, when time allows us to get together.

Hubby and the Sadist have met a few time to discuss and establish boundaries.

It is working out well so far, as the Sadist has no interest in exercising control on my time away from him, and at the same time he respects my husband and I relationship. Hubby too respects the Sadist and my relationship with him.

However, Hubby has veto power in case of conflicts and I always make sure to discuss and get his approval for play that could leave me needing some healing time beside standard bruising (and as such interfere with Hubby's own enjoyment).

From my point of view, it is not that hard, thanks to Hubby and the Sadist.
They don't need to play the "who's the boss" game, as my marriage comes first and everything else can be discussed and negotiated and arranged.

It can be a bit tricky at times, when I'm going through subdrop and I'm expected to serve Hubby properly, or when I have to handle bruises and scheduling for entertaining Hubby's wife-sharing desires. But nothing that cannot be done.

Of course it also means that I need to get both permission if I were to play with another Top (unless it is happening as part of my services to one of them and under the control of one of them).
 
Back
Top