Stimulus Bill: 53.4 % Unemployment

akatrex

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Posts
2,805
The dead end kids
Young, unemployed and facing tough future
By RICHARD WILNER
Last Updated: 12:31 PM, September 29, 2009

The number of young Americans without a job has exploded to 53.4 percent — a post-World War II high, according to the Labor Dept. — meaning millions of Americans are staring at the likelihood that their lifetime earning potential will be diminished and, combined with the predicted slow economic recovery, their transition into productive members of society could be put on hold for an extended period of time.

The number represents the flip-side to the Labor Dept.'s report that the employment rate of 16-to-24 year olds has eroded to 46.6 percent -- the lowest ratio of working young Americans in that age group, including all but those in the military, since WWII.

And worse, without a clear economic recovery plan aimed at creating entry-level jobs, the odds of many of these young adults -- aged 16 to 24, excluding students -- getting a job and moving out of their parents' houses are long. Young workers have been among the hardest hit during the current recession -- in which a total of 6.9 million jobs have been lost.

"It's an extremely dire situation in the short run," said Heidi Shierholz, an economist with the Washington-based Economic Policy Institute. "This group won't do as well as their parents unless the jobs situation changes."
Al Angrisani, the former assistant Labor Department secretary under President Reagan, doesn't see a turnaround in the jobs picture for entry-level workers and places the blame squarely on the Obama administration and the construction of its stimulus bill.

"There is no assistance provided for the development of job growth through small businesses, which create 70 percent of the jobs in the country," Angrisani said in an interview last week. "All those [unemployed young people] should be getting hired by small businesses."

There are six million small businesses in the country, those that employ less than 100 people, and a jobs stimulus bill should include tax credits to give incentives to those businesses to hire people, the former Labor official said.
"If each of the businesses hired just one person, we would go a long way in growing ourselves back to where we were before the recession," Angrisani noted.

During previous recessions, in the early '80s, early '90s and after Sept. 11, 2001, unemployment among 16-to-24 year olds never went above 50 percent. Except after 9/11, jobs growth followed within two years.
A much slower recovery is forecast today. Shierholz believes it could take four or five years to ramp up jobs again.

A study from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, a government database, said the damage to a new career by a recession can last 15 years. And if young Americans are not working and becoming productive members of society, they are less likely to make major purchases -- from cars to homes -- thus putting the US economy further behind the eight ball.

Angrisani said he believes that Obama's economic team, led by Larry Summers, has a blind spot for small business because no senior member of the team -- dominated by academics and veterans of big business -- has ever started and grown a business.

"The Reagan administration had people who knew of small business," he said.
"They should carve out $100 billion right now and create something like $5,000 to $6,000 job credits that would drive the hiring of young, idled workers by small business."

Angrisani said the stimulus money going to extending unemployment benefits is like a narcotic that is keeping the unemployed content -- but doing little to get them jobs.

Labor Dept. statistics also show that the number of chronically unemployed -- those without a job for 27 weeks or more -- has also hit a post-WWII high.


The dead end kids
 
The dead end kids
Young, unemployed and facing tough future
By RICHARD WILNER
Last Updated: 12:31 PM, September 29, 2009

The number of young Americans without a job has exploded to 53.4 percent — a post-World War II high, according to the Labor Dept. — meaning millions of Americans are staring at the likelihood that their lifetime earning potential will be diminished and, combined with the predicted slow economic recovery, their transition into productive members of society could be put on hold for an extended period of time.

The dead end kids

The irony is that the youth vote was overwhelmingly for Obama. The policies that he was advocating as a candidate were clearly anti-job, anti-growth and many people pointed that out including leading economists. There was a young woman who came to my door and wanted to tell me about how great Obama was and I looked at her and said "You do realize that your vote for Obama is a vote to eliminate your job"....came true dat.
 
The irony is that the youth vote was overwhelmingly for Obama. The policies that he was advocating as a candidate were clearly anti-job, anti-growth and many people pointed that out including leading economists. There was a young woman who came to my door and wanted to tell me about how great Obama was and I looked at her and said "You do realize that your vote for Obama is a vote to eliminate your job"....came true dat.

We can never know what would be happening if John McCain had won the election. We do know that Democrat Presidents nearly always have a better record on job creation than Republicans.

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/01/09/bush-on-jobs-the-worst-track-record-on-record/
 
We can never know what would be happening if John McCain had won the election. We do know that Democrat Presidents nearly always have a better record on job creation than Republicans.

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/01/09/bush-on-jobs-the-worst-track-record-on-record/

Trou, you're always polite and I thank you for that. I still get the feeling that you're the little special ed kid in the neigborhood who keeps following me around repeating the same nonsense over and over again.
 
Trou, you're always polite and I thank you for that. I still get the feeling that you're the little special ed kid in the neigborhood (sic) who keeps following me around repeating the same nonsense over and over again.

I keep refuting your nonsense over and over again.
 
We can never know what would be happening if John McCain had won the election. We do know that Democrat Presidents nearly always have a better record on job creation than Republicans.


Le Trouser you are right Sir!

Its called BIG GOVERNMENT!

Dems add Lots and Lots and Lots of Government Jobs.
 
Aren't two of the top five presidents on that list Republicans?

Honestly, you should just give up now and save yourself the embarrassment.

Two of the top five were Reagan and Nixon. The other three were Clinton, Carter, and Johnson. The only Republican president with more job creation than two Democrat presidents was Reagan. His 2,000,000 number was higher than Kennedy's 1,200,000, and Truman's 1,100,000. We should keep in mind that when Reagan was president the U.S. population was higher than it was when Kennedy and Truman were president.

Of the post war presidents, the average number of jobs created per year when Democrats were president was 2,020,000. When Republicans were president it was 980,000.
 
Two of the top five were Reagan and Nixon. The other three were Clinton, Carter, and Johnson. The only Republican president with more job creation than two Democrat presidents was Reagan. His 2,000,000 number was higher than Kennedy's 1,200,000, and Truman's 1,100,000. We should keep in mind that when Reagan was president the U.S. population was higher than it was when Kennedy and Truman were president.

Of the post war presidents, the average number of jobs created per year when Democrats were president was 2,020,000. When Republicans were president it was 980,000.

Yep Big Government.
 
Yep Big Government.

My implication is that for most Americans big government has been good government.

From the New Deal to the juxtaposition of the War on Poverty with the black ghetto riots of the 1960's, most Americans trusted the government. President Obama has the opportunity, and the responsibility to restore that trust.
 
My implication is that for most Americans big government has been good government.

From the New Deal to the juxtaposition of the War on Poverty with the black ghetto riots of the 1960's, most Americans trusted the government. President Obama has the opportunity, and the responsibility to restore that trust.

There's something those big government countries have that we don't - a lower standard of living.
 
Back
Top