Sarah Palin pulls a Dixie chicks

Redneck translation?




Our guy is failing, much to Limbaugh's delight, so now it's time to really turn up the heat on stupid Sarah and her family...
 
This is your argument? You guys are pathetic.

Duh...Palin is a politician, who ran against the guy less than a year ago.

Whereas the Dixie Chicks are entertainers, who decided to make political comments that ran counter to the views of most of their fans.

You would have a beef with Palin if she started singing liberal gangsta rap (yeah, that's redundant) to a group of Republican backers.

'til then, nice try.
http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/2780/slide_2780_38649_large.jpg
 
University administrators worship private money, and then among themselves scoff at the capitalism that created it. Campus elites, looking at a benefactor, are fascinated how someone — no brighter than they are — made so much money, even as they are repelled by a system that allows those other than themselves to have pulled it off. No wonder that Obama seems enchanted by a Warren Buffett, even as he trashes the very landscape that created Berkshire Hathaway’s riches. No president has raised more money from Wall Street or has given it more protection from accountability — while at the same time demagoguing it as selfish and greedy.

Many of the former Professor Obama’s problems so far hinge on his administration’s inability to judge public opinion, its own self-righteous sense of self, its non-stop sermonizing, and its suspicion of sincere dissent. In other words, the United States is now a campus, we are the students, and Obama is our university president.

That is a very interesting perspective. Makes good sense.
 
A number of people who heard the speech in a packed hotel ballroom, which was closed to the media, said Mrs. Palin spoke from notes for 90 minutes and that she was articulate, well-prepared and even compelling.

...

She's bright.


UNLIKE the Dixie Twits.
__________________
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it."
Frederic Bastiat
 
no DUMMY, the difference is

Palin mentioned policy

the D Chix said they were ashamed to ba Americans

Not that YOU would get it:D

interesting

the part of TOLERANCE turns her into a SEX OBJECT

almost like me calling teh COLOREDCUNT a GO-RILLA!:D
 
Sarah Palin goes to China and talks ill of the sitting president. She even brings up death panels again.

Where is the outrage from the conservatives that someone went to foreign soil to badmouth the president. They said it wasn't that the Dixie Chicks said it. It was they said it over in England instead of over here. Shouldn't they be just as outraged that Palin did the same thing? In communist China no less.

It's much better than the President of the United States going to foreign soil and bad mouthing the United states of America.....
 
“The speech was wide-ranging, very balanced, and she beat all expectations,” said Doug A. Coulter, head of private equity in the Asia-Pacific region for LGT Capital Partners.

“She didn’t sound at all like a far-right-wing conservative. She seemed to be positioning herself as a libertarian or a small-c conservative,” he said, adding that she mentioned both Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. “She brought up both those names.”

Mrs. Palin said she was speaking as “someone from Main Street U.S.A.,” and she touched on her concerns about oversized federal bailouts and the unsustainable American government deficit....

On second thought, maybe this does sound like bad-mouthing to a post-American Political Party...

Former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton tells NRO that President Obama’s address to the U.N. was “a post-American speech by our first post-American president. It was a speech high on the personality of Barack Obama and high on multilateralism, but very short in advocating American interests.”

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODA2YzJmNTkwYmFmZDk4MTQwNWFkYzJjNzM5Y2MwMmE=
 
Yes, very typical...

I think this INXS lyric sums up the current state of the Democratic Party quite nicely...

(most student bodies too)

... And we slink like ally cats,
Tearing down what we attack,
To prove that we are one.

Compare:

Obama has simply emulated the worldview and style of a college administrator. So he thinks that reframing the same old empty banalities with new rhetorical flourishes and signs of fresh commitment and empathy will automatically result in new faculty converts. There is no there there in health-care reform, but opponents can be either bullied, shamed, or mesmerized into thinking there is.

Czars are a university favorite. Among the frequent topics of the daily university executive communiqués are the formulaic “My team now includes . . . ,” “I have just appointed . . . ,” “Under my direction . . . ” (that first-person overload is, of course, another Obama characteristic), followed by announcement of a new “special” appointment: “special assistant to the president for diversity,” “acting assistant provost for community affairs and external relations,” “associate dean for curriculum enhancement and development.”

Most of these tasks are either unnecessary or amply covered by existing faculty, department chairs, and deans. Czars, however, proliferated on campuses for fairly obvious reasons. First, they are spotlights illuminating the university administration’s commitment to a particular fashionable cause by the showy creation of a high-profile, highly remunerative new job. When loud protests meet the university’s inability to create a new department or fund a trendy but costly special program, administrators often take their loudest critics and make them czars — satisfying the “base” without substantial policy changes.

Second, czars are a way to circumvent the usual workings of the university, especially faculty committees in which there is an outside chance of some marginalized conservative voting against putting “Race, Class, and Gender in the Latina Cinema” into the general-education curriculum.

Special assistants for and associates of something or other are not vetted. Czars create an alternative university administration that can create special billets, hire adjuncts (with de facto security), and obtain budgeting without faculty oversight. The special assistant or associate rarely is hired through a normal search process open to the campus community, but rather is simply selected and promoted by administrative fiat.

With Bolton's remarks

Also noteworthy, Bolton says, was how Obama highlighted “just how much of American foreign policy that he wants to run through the U.N.”

“Usually presidential speeches at the U.N. are ‘state of the world’ addresses. Obama’s speech was filled with talk about U.N. bodies, U.N. treaties, and sending Secretary of State Clinton to a conference on the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, which would be an incredible waste of time for her. The president’s speech showed a fascination with U.N.-centric issues. Obama talked about getting past ‘balance of power’ politics. He talked about the interests that unite us rather than divide us.”

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODA2YzJmNTkwYmFmZDk4MTQwNWFkYzJjNzM5Y2MwMmE=
 
Sarah Palin has a right to be in China. She can see it from her upstairs bathroom window.
 
It's much better than the President of the United States going to foreign soil and bad mouthing the United states of America.....

He's doing that in New York this week. Of course, maybe he thinks of the US as a foreign country?
 
He's doing that in New York this week. Of course, maybe he thinks of the US as a foreign country?

Maybe they shoulda had the meeting at that nutcase Rick Perrys joint in Texas.

Thats not still the USA is it?

Slam!

I still got it....Like Ralph Malph!
 
Maybe they shoulda had the meeting at that nutcase Rick Perrys joint in Texas.

Thats not still the USA is it?

Slam!

I still got it....Like Ralph Malph!

Perry's...

More illiteracy.

;) ;)

There's more text from the speech at NRO if you illiterates care to try and read some big words like Tibet...
 
Yeah, well, whatever. His mom is not responsible for him. His girlfriend chooses to be with him.

I'm just not into remarks about moms (Hi DCL) or kids (hi Rob). Who needs it?
 
This is your argument? You guys are pathetic.

Duh...Palin is a politician, who ran against the guy less than a year ago.

Whereas the Dixie Chicks are entertainers, who decided to make political comments that ran counter to the views of most of their fans.

You would have a beef with Palin if she started singing liberal gangsta rap (yeah, that's redundant) to a group of Republican backers.

'til then, nice try.

So if I understand you correctly, it's okay for a POLITICIAN to go to another country to criticize America, but not okay for an ENTERTAINER to do so?

Curious set of values you have there.
 
Back
Top