Karen Kraft Is a Male!!

it's because she's crazy.

... as demonstrated by her refusal to join the Obama-gushing-admiration society.

To question is treason.

Failure to gush is insanity.

You are of that sort that believes the most efficient way for Baskin-Robbins to operate is to determine which flavor of ice cream is the most popular, and then serve just that flavor.

Anyone who asks why must be a Holocaust-denier, which means they're crazy.

Hope, Change, One Flavor.
 
There is no you and I, dude. You just aren't my type and apparently, not Karen's type either.

So we (you & I) never had the conversation where you claimed to have the video, I asked you to prove that you had it, and you admitted you couldn't prove it?
 
So we (you & I) never had the conversation where you claimed to have the video, I asked you to prove that you had it, and you admitted you couldn't prove it?

Oh so we are back to that again? Yes, we had that conversation. Yes I have that video. No, I don't have to prove anything to you. Who are you to ask for proof about anything regarding someone else on this board?

Now, can you prove that you are a moron?
 
Karen Kraft can write complete sentences and entire paragraphs that lack any errors of grammar or spelling. Those skills on the Literotica General Board attract attention, especially when they coexist with bizarre right wing delusions.

Nevertheless, Karen Kraft's posts rarely give evidence of wide reading, and cultural literacy.

Not so. I produce plenty of political and cultural insight; however, it does not agree with your point of view. Thus, it lacks evidence of "wide reading" means the reading that YOU think is correct. As for cultural literacy, my posts of American life and history are excellent. They are not cut-and-paste, much as some of the mouth-breathers here would like.

But what IS important is this: the reason I rarely respond to you has been stated by me at least twice in the past: you post well, but you make untrue statements. When confronted with the actual facts, supported by citations, you disappear from the thread to play the same game in another.

I've told you that it is intellectually dishonest for you to do that, yet you continue to do so.

If someone asks me to back up a statement I make, I do it or I admit that I cannot or will not. I don't just wonder off to another thread to repeat the error.

Exception: I have noted that the people who know that I am who I say I am, yet continue to say that I am something else, and expect me to spend my time trying to convince them otherwise, these same people take great umbrage at being told that they are pedophiles or perverts and are outraged at my expectation that they spend their time here proving to me that they are not.

What is astounding is that they are too dumb to see the parallel, and too arrogant to learn from their oft-repeated error.
 
Last edited:
So we (you & I) never had the conversation where you claimed to have the video, I asked you to prove that you had it, and you admitted you couldn't prove it?

See now you are playing games. Let me see if I can remember how this game is played.

Rules

1. You say you have something.

2. Others want it so they call you a liar.

3. You say no you are not.

4. They say yes you are and to prove your innocence.

5. You don't wish to share, for what ever reason, so you don't.

6. They call you a lier and poke and prod to make you mad enough to show them what they want in order to defend yourself.

Stupid game. But it is surprising how many people fall for it.
 
Last edited:
See now you are playing games. Let me see if I can remember how this game is played.

Rules

1. You say you have something.

2. Others want it so they call you a lier.

3. You say no you are not.

4. They say yes you are and to prove your innocence.

5. You don't wish to share, for what ever reason, so you don't.

6. They call you a lier and poke and prod to make you mad enough to show them what they want in order to defend yourself.

Stupid game. But it is surprising how many people fall for it.
Liar.
 
And stupid. But of course the stupider people think she's smart.

And, of course, what is amazing is that you can determine the quality of my mind based on posts that you admit you can't read because you "have it [me] on ignore because there's too much stupid here."

Your statement fills in all the blanks, tops off the tanks, boils down your opinion to be self-declared as useless.

Yet you feel compelled to "contribute" in every "Karen" thread there is.

Funny thing, eh? Kind of like U_D, the Dunce.
 
I think it's a given that all birthers are complete morons and most are racists.

There we go: Moron AND racist.

Here you have it folks: The voice of the Democrats. Disagree with Obama and you are not only stupid, you are a racist.

... and this from someone who admits that he/she refuses to read.

Great.
:rolleyes:
 
I've had it on iggy pretty much forever, dumbass. I took it off iggy once because someone said something about it making a thread about me so I wanted to see and then it went right back on iggy.
Oh, I think I 'viewed post' once or twice when I knew it was about me.
Stop being stupid.


I've had it on iggy pretty much forever, dumbass. I took it off iggy once because someone said something about it making a thread about me so I wanted to see and then it went right back on iggy.
Oh, I think I 'viewed post' once or twice when I knew it was about me.
Stop being stupid.

I've had it on iggy pretty much forever, dumbass. I took it off iggy once because someone said something about it making a thread about me so I wanted to see and then it went right back on iggy.
Oh, I think I 'viewed post' once or twice when I knew it was about me.
Stop being stupid.


Gee, I guess that says it all about you.

You are nothing -- by your own admission.
 
:rose:

You're trying, at least. I give you that much.

How is it "trying" to state the following:

1. I don't know what Karen posts; and

2. Based on her posts, she is stupid.

Please explain.

This ought to be interesting.

Oh, by the way.... what is the definition of "prejudice"?
 
There we go: Moron AND racist.

Here you have it folks: The voice of the Democrats. Disagree with Obama and you are not only stupid, you are a racist.

You don't have to agree with Obama. I don't agree with a few of the things he's done or doing, myself. Or that some things could've been done better. I'm not expecting him to be perfect or absolute. I never did.

But the birther bullshit has got to be deaded. It is not helping you at all.
 
But what IS important is this: the reason I rarely respond to you has been stated by me at least twice in the past: you post well, but you make untrue statements. When confronted with the actual facts, supported by citations, you disappear from the thread to play the same game in another.


List several untrue statements I have posted. List empirical statements, not normative ones. You and I obviously have different values, concerns, and goals. List several things I have said that are factually incorrect.
 
Who are you? Look, I don't care what you do with Karen Kraft.

I find it funny as hell that those who were bashing her hit the skids the second she showed up posting in here.

Excellent point.

You know why that is? The same reason they think I'm like a guy:

Because I don't back down when I'm in a confrontation, and I don't let pussies get away with bullshit. They run because they can't cut the mustard and prefer to do their insecure snarking far from my view.

Sometimes I ignore the threads about me (unless they're positive, in which case I flop over on my back and squish around in them like a horny hound on roadkill [my Dan Rather tribute for the evening]). But once in a while it's nice to "see what they got," so to speak.

"They got nothin'."

As shown by their conclusive emasculation here.

How sweet it is.
 
Excellent point.

You know why that is? The same reason they think I'm like a guy:

Because I don't back down when I'm in a confrontation, and I don't let pussies get away with bullshit. They run because they can't cut the mustard and prefer to do their insecure snarking far from my view.

Sometimes I ignore the threads about me (unless they're positive, in which case I flop over on my back and squish around in them like a horny hound on roadkill [my Dan Rather tribute for the evening]). But once in a while it's nice to "see what they got," so to speak.

"They got nothin'."

As shown by their conclusive emasculation here.

How sweet it is.

Why do you care so much?
 
Back
Top