Arnold Schwarzenegger is attempting to murder 30,000 families

Le Jacquelope

Loves Spam
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Posts
76,445
This budget is about to put California in a larger economic bind than ever before.

Plus our illustrious Governor is advocating murdering a large swatch of the poor by condemning them to starvation.

This could be the ruin of the Republican Party in California.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090715/us_nm/us_usa_states_budget_california

California's needy may bear brunt of budget crisis

By Steve Gorman – Wed Jul 15, 10:54 am ET

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – An ill-timed pregnancy and domestic abuse left Amanda Garcia facing a dire future last year at the prime of life, until California's welfare-to-work program enabled her return to college after her baby was born.

Now the state's budget crisis is clouding her second chance for a college degree and a professional career. Garcia, 19, who aspires to become a police officer and a lawyer, just learned this month that her childcare assistance may be stopped.

"I started crying," she said, recounting the notice that brought to her suburban Los Angeles mailbox the reality of massive spending cuts likely to tatter California's social safety net starting later this year.

She is hardly alone.

From drug addicts facing longer waiting lists for rehab -- or jail terms if they fail to get in -- to recession-battered families newly dependent on low-cost health insurance for their children, California's budget turmoil is about to hit home for hundreds of thousands of its most vulnerable residents.

The scope and duration of impending cuts remain uncertain as state lawmakers and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger tussle over a balanced-budget plan. Advocates of the poor say reductions under consideration would be devastating to the needy and impede the state's economic recovery.

They say many such cuts would ultimately cost the state more money than they save, as when elderly patients, forced out of adult day-care facilities, end up in nursing homes.

"It's penny-wise and pound-foolish," said Michael Herald, a lobbyist for the Western Center on Law & Poverty.

LOSING GROUND

The situation seems especially troubling for California, which has the largest population and economy of the 50 U.S. states. It is also one of the most socially progressive.

"California has been a leader, and I think this budget this year is definitely regressive. It takes us back decades," said Lydia Missaelides, executive director of the California Association of Adult Day Services in Sacramento.

California spent 70 percent more per capita than the rest of the country on social services in 2002, the last year such figures were available from the U.S. Census Bureau, according to a 2007 study by the Public Policy Institute of California.

Only New York spent more per capita -- California spends less on average per welfare recipient because the wider distribution of benefits means they are spread more thinly.

One rationale cited for California's generosity is that the cost of living in its biggest cities, where the bulk of aid to the poor is directed, runs higher than in much of the country.

Nick Johnson, an analyst for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said social welfare programs have been especially hard hit in many states this year, including Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts and Minnesota.

California's fiscal crisis is especially desperate.

Schwarzenegger and legislators are wrestling to close a $26.3 billion budget deficit created in large part by plunging revenues, the result of a deepening recession, rising unemployment and a prolonged housing slump.

County agencies administering the state's social welfare programs already are feeling the pinch from local funding cuts just as demands for their services are soaring.

"You have this big hole to fill in the budget, and at the 11th hour it's all about how you cut back on the poor," said Bill Taylor, director of intergovernmental relations for the Los Angeles County Department Public Social Services.

The outcome has life-altering implications for individuals like Garcia. She is one of 1.4 million people served by the state's CalWorks program, part of a federally backed initiative that has converted the nation's welfare system into a program designed to move poor, jobless Americans into full employment.

"It is a lifesaver. It means everything to me," said Garcia, who was fired from her last job in 2008 because of pregnancy complications that landed her in the hospital.

She left her boyfriend, the father of her child, when he became physically abusive five days after the baby was born. Turning up at a local welfare office, she enrolled in CalWorks, and within two months was back in college full time.

GENEROUS TO A FAULT?

Schwarzenegger recently singled out welfare-to-work as one of numerous programs in need of reforms that he insists be included in a budget deal with lawmakers to root out "waste, fraud and abuse of your hard-earned tax dollars."

He said his revisions to CalWorks, including stricter eligibility for assistance, will save $753 million this year and $1.5 billion annually after that.

Welfare advocates say his plan puts a greater burden on cash-strapped counties and cuts vital services just as demand for them is on the rise. They cite studies showing CalWorks generates more than $7 billion in economic output.

Schwarzenegger argues that CalWorks is too lenient and that his reforms would rid the program of recipients who fail to meet federally mandated work requirements.

Taylor said the governor's proposal would immediately dump over 30,000 families, including more than 70,000 children, from the welfare-to-work program in Los Angeles County alone.

Herald said 250,000 children statewide would be cut off from cash assistance.

"And those are the children who sadly will probably end up in our child welfare system, which the governor is cutting by 10 percent," Herald said. "So we're going to dump more kids into the system and have less money to care for them."

Other safety-net programs on the chopping block include state-funded health insurance for children of low-income families; daycare facilities and in-home healthcare for the elderly and disabled; and a program providing treatment rather than jail time for first-time drug offenders.

Garcia and other CalWorks recipients say they follow news of the state budget crisis but try not to dwell on it.

"I try to be optimistic," Garcia said with a shy smile. I've been though a lot. And I just need to find a way to get through it for my son."

(Editing by Howard Goller and James Dalgleish)
 
BB ,vetteman, powerstone, miles will say let them stare. compasionate conservetism at its best
 
Maybe if she would have used birth control, her and the taxpayers would have been better off.:rolleyes:
 
Do any of the 30,000 that he is attempting to murder have the last name Connor by any chance?
 
Maybe if she would have used birth control, her and the taxpayers would have been better off.:rolleyes:

more compasionate concervative values.

why should she use birth control your momdidnt. hell she still didnt when she was pregnant and fucking the UPS man.
 
more compasionate concervative values.

why should she use birth control your momdidnt. hell she still didnt when she was pregnant and fucking the UPS man.

Turd, you are not funny and that was one of the lamest mother jokes I have ever heard. No wonder you need an alt to post under.
 
more compasionate concervative values.

why should she use birth control your momdidnt. hell she still didnt when she was pregnant and fucking the UPS man.
Commonfreeman doesn't hold the same standard for his mom because he lives safe and snug in the basement of his mommy's house.

You can't ask trailer trash like him simple questions like:
What if her baby's father turned abusive 5 days after the baby was born? (hmmm)

What if she had a good job ahead of the birth of her child but lost it afterwards?

This is the same shit that infuriates me about pro-choicers. Being "wanted and planned" is one of those optimal things that may be true before birth and then not true some time after birth. What happens then when the kid stops being wanted and planned but is already born? Likewise, being economically prepared for a child may be true for some people before birth but then untrue due to situations that arise after. Does her worthiness for welfare suddenly become null and void because her ability to afford the child existed before hand but then was lost after?


Commonfreeman is too stupid to grasp such issues, and so are all the other right wingers here.

Their ultimate answer is that she should have been clairvoyant...
 
Turd, you are not funny and that was one of the lamest mother jokes I have ever heard. No wonder you need an alt to post under.

why dont you go back to your bunker and pray to the corpse of david koresh that the government doesnt come take your precious red rider beebee gun.
 
Commonfreeman doesn't hold the same standard for his mom because he lives safe and snug in the basement of his mommy's house.

You can't ask trailer trash like him simple questions like:
What if her baby's father turned abusive 5 days after the baby was born? (hmmm)

What if she had a good job ahead of the birth of her child but lost it afterwards?

This is the same shit that infuriates me about pro-choicers. Being "wanted and planned" is one of those optimal things that may be true before birth and then not true some time after birth. What happens then when the kid stops being wanted and planned but is already born? Likewise, being economically prepared for a child may be true for some people before birth but then untrue due to situations that arise after. Does her worthiness for welfare suddenly become null and void because her ability to afford the child existed before hand but then was lost after?


Commonfreeman is too stupid to grasp such issues, and so are all the other right wingers here.

Their ultimate answer is that she should have been clairvoyant...

Yes, it is very likely this 18 year old at the time and her "all of sudden" abusive boyfriend planned this pregnancy, they were just in such a hurry that they never got married or saved money.:rolleyes:
 
Yes, it is very likely this 18 year old at the time and her "all of sudden" abusive boyfriend planned this pregnancy, they were just in such a hurry that they never got married or saved money.:rolleyes:

or her boyfriend could have died, been shipped off to iraq, been in a car accident, saw you naked and died laughing. all sorts of stuff. or she could have lost her job. or the baby could have been forced on her from a dying family member and she is caring for it as one of her own.

republicans are supposed to be the party of jesus so in that spirit what would jesus do? he would throw her in the gutter with her baby and rent out her apartment. lazy fucking bum.
 
This budget is about to put California in a larger economic bind than ever before.

Plus our illustrious Governor is advocating murdering a large swatch of the poor by condemning them to starvation.

This could be the ruin of the Republican Party in California.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090715/us_nm/us_usa_states_budget_california

California's needy may bear brunt of budget crisis

By Steve Gorman – Wed Jul 15, 10:54 am ET

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – An ill-timed pregnancy and domestic abuse left Amanda Garcia facing a dire future last year at the prime of life, until California's welfare-to-work program enabled her return to college after her baby was born.

Now the state's budget crisis is clouding her second chance for a college degree and a professional career. Garcia, 19, who aspires to become a police officer and a lawyer, just learned this month that her childcare assistance may be stopped.

"I started crying," she said, recounting the notice that brought to her suburban Los Angeles mailbox the reality of massive spending cuts likely to tatter California's social safety net starting later this year.

She is hardly alone.

From drug addicts facing longer waiting lists for rehab -- or jail terms if they fail to get in -- to recession-battered families newly dependent on low-cost health insurance for their children, California's budget turmoil is about to hit home for hundreds of thousands of its most vulnerable residents.

The scope and duration of impending cuts remain uncertain as state lawmakers and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger tussle over a balanced-budget plan. Advocates of the poor say reductions under consideration would be devastating to the needy and impede the state's economic recovery.

They say many such cuts would ultimately cost the state more money than they save, as when elderly patients, forced out of adult day-care facilities, end up in nursing homes.

"It's penny-wise and pound-foolish," said Michael Herald, a lobbyist for the Western Center on Law & Poverty.

LOSING GROUND

The situation seems especially troubling for California, which has the largest population and economy of the 50 U.S. states. It is also one of the most socially progressive.

"California has been a leader, and I think this budget this year is definitely regressive. It takes us back decades," said Lydia Missaelides, executive director of the California Association of Adult Day Services in Sacramento.

California spent 70 percent more per capita than the rest of the country on social services in 2002, the last year such figures were available from the U.S. Census Bureau, according to a 2007 study by the Public Policy Institute of California.

Only New York spent more per capita -- California spends less on average per welfare recipient because the wider distribution of benefits means they are spread more thinly.

One rationale cited for California's generosity is that the cost of living in its biggest cities, where the bulk of aid to the poor is directed, runs higher than in much of the country.

Nick Johnson, an analyst for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said social welfare programs have been especially hard hit in many states this year, including Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts and Minnesota.

California's fiscal crisis is especially desperate.

Schwarzenegger and legislators are wrestling to close a $26.3 billion budget deficit created in large part by plunging revenues, the result of a deepening recession, rising unemployment and a prolonged housing slump.

County agencies administering the state's social welfare programs already are feeling the pinch from local funding cuts just as demands for their services are soaring.

"You have this big hole to fill in the budget, and at the 11th hour it's all about how you cut back on the poor," said Bill Taylor, director of intergovernmental relations for the Los Angeles County Department Public Social Services.

The outcome has life-altering implications for individuals like Garcia. She is one of 1.4 million people served by the state's CalWorks program, part of a federally backed initiative that has converted the nation's welfare system into a program designed to move poor, jobless Americans into full employment.

"It is a lifesaver. It means everything to me," said Garcia, who was fired from her last job in 2008 because of pregnancy complications that landed her in the hospital.

She left her boyfriend, the father of her child, when he became physically abusive five days after the baby was born. Turning up at a local welfare office, she enrolled in CalWorks, and within two months was back in college full time.

GENEROUS TO A FAULT?

Schwarzenegger recently singled out welfare-to-work as one of numerous programs in need of reforms that he insists be included in a budget deal with lawmakers to root out "waste, fraud and abuse of your hard-earned tax dollars."

He said his revisions to CalWorks, including stricter eligibility for assistance, will save $753 million this year and $1.5 billion annually after that.

Welfare advocates say his plan puts a greater burden on cash-strapped counties and cuts vital services just as demand for them is on the rise. They cite studies showing CalWorks generates more than $7 billion in economic output.

Schwarzenegger argues that CalWorks is too lenient and that his reforms would rid the program of recipients who fail to meet federally mandated work requirements.

Taylor said the governor's proposal would immediately dump over 30,000 families, including more than 70,000 children, from the welfare-to-work program in Los Angeles County alone.

Herald said 250,000 children statewide would be cut off from cash assistance.

"And those are the children who sadly will probably end up in our child welfare system, which the governor is cutting by 10 percent," Herald said. "So we're going to dump more kids into the system and have less money to care for them."

Other safety-net programs on the chopping block include state-funded health insurance for children of low-income families; daycare facilities and in-home healthcare for the elderly and disabled; and a program providing treatment rather than jail time for first-time drug offenders.

Garcia and other CalWorks recipients say they follow news of the state budget crisis but try not to dwell on it.

"I try to be optimistic," Garcia said with a shy smile. I've been though a lot. And I just need to find a way to get through it for my son."

(Editing by Howard Goller and James Dalgleish)

LOL

Wrong party!

Arnie is hated by California Republicans. He ran as a Republican but is in the pocket of the Democrats in the California State Legislature, the unions, etc. Don't ever try to convince a California Republican that Arnie is a Republican. There would be a fist fight.

I suspect he will change parties as he moves on from the Governorship.

As his wife told Teddy: Don't think of him as a Republican!
 
or her boyfriend could have died, been shipped off to iraq, been in a car accident, saw you naked and died laughing. all sorts of stuff. or she could have lost her job. or the baby could have been forced on her from a dying family member and she is caring for it as one of her own.

republicans are supposed to be the party of jesus so in that spirit what would jesus do? he would throw her in the gutter with her baby and rent out her apartment. lazy fucking bum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mQvvGJYQaM&feature=PlayList&p=5B0758079FFB7926&index=0&playnext=1
 
LOL

Wrong party!

Arnie is hated by California Republicans. He ran as a Republican but is in the pocket of the Democrats in the California State Legislature, the unions, etc. Don't ever try to convince a California Republican that Arnie is a Republican. There would be a fist fight.
Oooh. I know plenty of Republicans who never threw a punch at me for calling Arnie a Republican. :D
 
LOL

Wrong party!

Arnie is hated by California Republicans. He ran as a Republican but is in the pocket of the Democrats in the California State Legislature, the unions, etc. Don't ever try to convince a California Republican that Arnie is a Republican. There would be a fist fight.

I suspect he will change parties as he moves on from the Governorship.

As his wife told Teddy: Don't think of him as a Republican!

but what party is he a member of? until he switches parties he is a member of the RNC. just cause you dont like his actions doesnt make him a democrat. he is a republican at least for now.
 
But damn. He has such a muscular AV. You mean he doesn't scare you? :D :cool:

mine is arnie saying shut the fuck up doesnt make me arnie. his AV is the only thing about him that has come close to looking like a man. he is about as masculine as a bag of rainbows.
 
but what party is he a member of? until he switches parties he is a member of the RNC. just cause you dont like his actions doesnt make him a democrat. he is a republican at least for now.

This is quite true.

Republicans feel cheated by his candidacy. They feel that his politics were misrepresented -- that once in office he refused to cut spending but instead supported huge tax increases (the largest in the U.S.) in coalition with, and over the objections of - the real Republicans in the state. He is a Republican like Harlan Specter was a republican a few weeks ago. Or, historically, the way Sam Yorty was a Democrat many years ago.

(Democrats for Goldwater, Democrats for Nixon, etc.)

The last thing a local Californian would call Arnie is "Republican."

He is not.
 
Back
Top