"Star Trek". The Good, The Bad, and The Spoilers.

Dixon Carter Lee

Headliner
Joined
Nov 22, 1999
Posts
48,682
THE GOOD

Gorgeous to look at. Abrams did more with one static shot of the Enterprise than Robert Wise did with the 10 minute back rub he gave it in "The Motion Picture". Vulcan finally doesn't look like a matte painting or Arizona with a red filter. Engineering finally looks the appropriate size for a Starship. Space is a cold, scary, silent, far away place. And Uhura has nice tits.

The old characters are brought to life nicely. McCoy's cadence is dead on. Kirk's arrogance and circumspect take on the universe is intact. Spock is nicely layered. Sulu, Chekov and Scotty are the young turks. And Uhura has nice tits.

Kirk actually beds a green chick! Talk about your cliches coming true. Abrams plays it nicely by keeping the lights off until the green chick's roommate (Uhura) comes into the room, turns the lights on, and you can see she's green. Then Kirk hides under the bed and watches Uhura get undressed. And Uhura has nice tits.

The music is pretty good. And, like Kubric and others who have tried to do something interesting with space, they set great themes against, futuristic floating hardware, and it sticks.

This Enterprise has heft. It's not a big shiny model, or a kitschy flat CGI painting. It feels heavy. It crackles and pulses with energy. A scary kind of other-worldly energy. The Transporters snarl and whirl like electrified tornadoes. It flies in three dimensions. (There is no "up"). It pops in and out of warp like the Goddamned, mother-fucking Millennium Falcon, whipping to a stop like an Indy Car pulling into the Pits. The Interior is enormous, and crowded -- I'm pretty sure they're hiding the Ark of the Covenant down there somewhere.

By the end we see the beginnings of a great Kirk and Spock working relationship. It takes time to get there -- but we get there.

THE BAD

Star Trek has lost what made it Star Trek -- the Utopian future in which we play out contemporary morality plays as we explore the nature of human existence. The ultimate Hero's Journey. Gone is Space as the Final Frontier, with all that the word "Frontier" brings to the table - exploration, discovery, an awakening of primal gifts, the expansion of culture, of the mind, the testing of the soul, of the body, of the character. Now it's Space Opera. Gone is "The Human Adventure". Now it's Battleship Gigantica, phasers on kill!

Nimoy has portrayed two Spocks. There's the Spock before "Wrath of Khan" -- cool, smart, strong, wise, the best First Officer in Star Fleet, and light years ahead of everyone else in the room. Then there's the second Spock, the one after "Khan" (after his resurrection), who is a little dumb and childlike, naive, and always a step behind everyone, the one who swims with whales, and is jut a little silly. That's the one we get from Nimoy here. Too bad. I miss Spock.

Scotty has a little alien teddy bear pal supposedly around for comic relief. Abrams should have listened to a character in his other project, "Lost". As Hurley said a couple of weeks ago "The Ewoks suck, dude."

THE SPOILERS

As expected, the "alternate reality" thing is both liberating (for future movies) and infuriating (no Talos IV? Aw.) It's also too painful. Kirk loses a father he was never supposed to lose. And not only does Spock lose a mother -- he loses a whole fucking planet. No matter how much you kill the bad guy, if he does that much damage to you, he wins, not you. That's a mistake of the screenplay.

Nero isn't interesting enough. His motive seems dumb -- blaming Spock for something he clearly didn't do. And then to wait around in the past for 25 years (you'll understand when you see the film) until Spock arrives -- ?? Geez, after 25 years don't you calm the fuck down a little and see things straight? And what did this giant ship do for 25 years while it hid from The Federation and The Romulans and The Klingons and everyone else? Cruise around, looking for good sushi? It's not well thought out by the screenwriters, and it shows.

AND FINALLY

Can someone tell Kirk that in the future they have this thing called "The Internet"? He spends the whole movie trying to get Uhura's first name. It's, like, so hard to find out. Do they not have Google in the 23rd century? (By the way, Uhura's first name is -- who cares? Uhura has nice tits.)
 
How can the captain of a ship not be able to find out a crewmembers first name? That doesn't make sense.
 
Maybe they give her more in the movie but I've always thought Uhura was the weakest character. Sigourney Weaver in Galaxy Quest pretty much nailed her.
 
Thanks a lot for the full, and I mean FULL review. Now I don't have to see it.:(
 
Maybe they give her more in the movie but I've always thought Uhura was the weakest character.

To be fair, whenever the original series was in re-runs, they frequently cut out bits with Uhura, Spock and Chekov. Uhura sung quite a bit, and had some nice "off duty" scenes, and you got a real sense of her character. And she had my favorite line in the whole series: When Sulu goes a little crazy he grabs Uhura and screams "I'll save you, fair maiden!", to which Uhura replies, "Sorry, neither."

That was beautiful.
 
eh, i'm going to see it in about an hour. nothing you said surprises me, but i don't care.

yes, i am one of those rare people who are unaffected by spoilers. it's a gift.
 
The good reviews aren't lying. Go see it!

This movie was fantastic. I loved it up. The action/adventure aspect was very present the entire film and kept it interesting. I agree with most of "the good" above. I didn't really listen a whole lot to the music, but the use of moments without music was very intriguing. There were also very funny parts, venturing into hilarity. Not hokey, but honest. There were many great emotional aspects to the film also. No tears, but I did get a bit misty a couple times. I love the cast. They shine true, but distinct. I'm glad they didn't try to mimic every nuance of the character, that wouldn't make sense. Eric Bana was also great with what he had to work with.

Under the bad, I would've put the time traveling. The contrast of events between the original universe and the one Nero created were fresh. But, they could've restored the original universe to normal (too cliché?) and still made sequels, etc. The motivation for Nero did seem forced, but hey, who knows what a madman will do when he's out for revenge for the death of his wife, not to mention race.

I've been a fan of ST since 1998. I've seen every episode of TNG, DS9 and Voyager. I like the movies, even the motion picture, even though its pretty damn boring.

And Uhura has nice tits.
 
T they could've restored the original universe to normal (too cliché?) and still made sequels, etc.

I don't think so. What are they going to do, remake "Journey to Babel"? The problem with keeping the original timeline means that there are no real surprises. We already know the history of Kirk's crew -- who grows emotionally, and how, and who gets promoted, killed, who they battle, what the stakes are, what happens to the Klingons the Romulans, etc., etc. A screenplay would be hampered by all that annoying mythos. Better to start over.

Which still sucks, a bit.
 
that wasn't a damned ewok. he barely had any lines.

also, i liked it. i think sylar smiled too much, but whatever. it's a decent movie. let's just pray they don't try to remake wrath of khan any time soon and hopefully it'll all be okay.
 
Maybe they give her more in the movie but I've always thought Uhura was the weakest character. Sigourney Weaver in Galaxy Quest pretty much nailed her.

The chick who plays Uhura was in "The Terminal" and was a Trekkie...

In the Marines, you had no first name.
 
THE BAD

Star Trek has lost what made it Star Trek -- the Utopian future in which we play out contemporary morality plays as we explore the nature of human existence. The ultimate Hero's Journey. Gone is Space as the Final Frontier, with all that the word "Frontier" brings to the table - exploration, discovery, an awakening of primal gifts, the expansion of culture, of the mind, the testing of the soul, of the body, of the character. Now it's Space Opera. Gone is "The Human Adventure". Now it's Battleship Gigantica, phasers on kill!

Nimoy has portrayed two Spocks. There's the Spock before "Wrath of Khan" -- cool, smart, strong, wise, the best First Officer in Star Fleet, and light years ahead of everyone else in the room. Then there's the second Spock, the one after "Khan" (after his resurrection), who is a little dumb and childlike, naive, and always a step behind everyone, the one who swims with whales, and is jut a little silly. That's the one we get from Nimoy here. Too bad. I miss Spock.

Scotty has a little alien teddy bear pal supposedly around for comic relief. Abrams should have listened to a character in his other project, "Lost". As Hurley said a couple of weeks ago "The Ewoks suck, dude."

Told ya so.
 
The part I quoted, dumbass.

Except the ewok part. I did not see that coming.

it's not an ewok. i have no idea what it is or why it's in the movie, but it's not quite an ewok. he doesn't really do anything and only has like one line and barely any screen time. it's just a lumpy black midget that apparently can survive off of one bean.
 
it's not an ewok. i have no idea what it is or why it's in the movie, but it's not quite an ewok. he doesn't really do anything and only has like one line and barely any screen time. it's just a lumpy black midget that apparently can survive off of one bean.

When will screenwriters learn that cute little aliens will ruin a movie faster than a redheaded kid on a sitcom?
Almost killed Star Wars and completely ruined Lost in Space.
 
it's not an ewok. i have no idea what it is or why it's in the movie, but it's not quite an ewok. he doesn't really do anything and only has like one line and barely any screen time.

So it's exactly like an ewok...except it's not an ewok?
 
Back
Top