Catholic church to psychologically test to weed out homosexual priests....

matriarch

Rotund retiree
Joined
May 25, 2003
Posts
22,743
....My god, could they have got it any more wrong?

I find it revealing that they prefer to focus on a sexuality that is practised, in most countries, legally, between consenting adults, rather on those despicable, perverted men who prey on children, causing incalculable harm.

Psychological tests for priests to screen out homosexuals
New personality tests for seminarians criticised by gay rights groups
By Andy McSmith
Saturday, 8 November 2008

The Catholic Church is to vet all candidates for the priesthood to eliminate anyone suspected of "deeply seated" homosexuality.

After being hit by a series of sex scandals, the Vatican has given the seal of approval to the psychological screening to test for evidence of personality disorders or serious doubts about aptitude for the priesthood.

Controversially, the head of the Vatican committee that made the recommendations has made it clear they should be used to screen out homosexuals, even if they are celibate, because homosexuality is "a type of deviation" that disqualifies a priest from exercising "spiritual paternity".

But Ben Summerskill, chief executive of the gay equality group Stonewall, warned: "It's a tragedy at a time when the Roman Catholic Church is desperately short of people seeking a vocation in the Church ... What will they do with someone they deemed to be innately homosexual because of his strange gait or rather odd look and who turned out to be heterosexual? The Pope wears Prada shoes, which might end regrettably with some ridiculous cardinal making unfair suggestions about him. Exercises like these always end in tears."

The "Guidelines for the Use of Psychology in the Admission and Formation of Candidates for the Priesthood" were drawn up by the Congregation for Catholic Education in the Vatican. Speaking at a press conference earlier this week, the prefect of the Congregation, Cardinal Grocholewski, explained why a seminarian should be excluded from the priesthood even if he is celibate if it appeared that he was homosexual. His remarks, delivered in Italian, were overlooked in Britain until they appeared in translation in yesterday's Catholic Herald.

"The candidate does not necessarily have to practise homosexuality. He can even be without sin," the Cardinal said. "But if he has this deep-seated tendency, he cannot be admitted to priestly ministry precisely because of the nature of the priesthood, in which a spiritual paternity is carried out. Here we are not talking about whether he commits sins, but whether this deeply rooted tendency remains."

He added: "In a certain sense, when we ask why Christ reserved the priesthood to men, we speak of this spiritual paternity, and maintain that homosexuality is a type of deviation, a type of irregularity. Therefore it is a type of wound in the exercise of the priesthood, in forming relations with others. And precisely for this reason we say that something isn't right in the psyche of such a man. We don't simply talk about the ability to abstain from these kinds of relations."

The Congregation issued a similar warning in 2005, but this week's document – which is not available in English – appears to go further.

It says that if seminary students show signs of grave immaturity, then "the path of formation will have to be interrupted". Symptoms of "immaturity" would include unclear sexual identity, difficulty with the celibate life, excessive rigidity of character and lack of freedom in relations.

When it comes to assessing a candidate's ability to be celibate, the document suggests that "it is not enough to be sure that he is capable of abstaining from genital activity" but that it is also necessary "to evaluate his sexual orientation".

It recommends psychological tests, provided that the candidate gives his consent and that those conducting the tests do not use techniques outside their area of knowledge. Psychological testing is already used by the Catholic Church in Britain, although screening varies between dioceses.

A one-woman crusade: Against gay priests

*Patricia McKeever is a reclusive58-year-old former schoolteacher who has waged a campaign from her home in Scotland dedicated to the exposure of homosexual Roman Catholic priests. Through her newsletter Catholic Truth and its website, Ms McKeever has named at least four priests as being gay or associating with gay men. Ms McKeever insists that her newsletter is a "great work of charity", but it is far from popular among Catholic priests. The Archdiocese of Glasgow has accused her of harassment and she recently had to contact the police after receiving hardcore pornography in the post. "The Church has always taught that homosexuality is contrary to its teachings," Ms McKeever said in a rare interview. "Homosexual priests do not believe in the Catholic faith any more, so they shouldn't be in the Church."
 
That's the dumbest thing I have ever heard. While some pedophiles might be gay, not all gays are pedophiles. The church sure missed on this one.
 
Shhh....they might wake up from their daydream, where they can scapegoat homosexuals for their pathetic moral failure as the world's largest religion. :rolleyes:;)
 
Given the long tradition of gay priests and monks, of lesbian nuns, of Popes and bishops with concubines, mistresses, and even wives, I find this puritanism a bit convenient. But they need to blame someone, you see.

They can't admit that the Emperor's wearing no clothes. ;)
 
Gee, let's take the strongest biological urge known to humankind and attempt to completely stifle it in the name of piety. Psychologically, I think that's a recipe for perversion.
 
Clearly, the assumption is that a straight priest can be celibate and control his urges, whereas a gay priest cannot. :rolleyes:

There is nothing more hypocritical than organized religion.
 
Clearly, the assumption is that a straight priest can be celibate and control his urges, whereas a gay priest cannot. :rolleyes:

There is nothing more hypocritical than organized religion.

Sure there is, they're called politicians.
 
Gee, let's take the strongest biological urge known to humankind and attempt to completely stifle it in the name of piety. Psychologically, I think that's a recipe for perversion.

True. Though I agree with the nominalists that perversion in its present use as a term is just a name at its root, created by the very same moralists. Just being pedantic here, of course. Not really taking issue with your basic position.

To me, true perversion is going against Nature. So celibacy is far more perverse than sodomy, in my book. ;)
 
To me, true perversion is going against Nature. So celibacy is far more perverse than sodomy, in my book. ;)

I see celibacy as a 'noble' endeavor. And by 'noble,' I mean going against the natural order of things, and not espousing the virtues of anyone, past or present, who claims a royal bloodline.

Any endeavor that tackles the normal human range of existence is something like a social experiment in human will. I think the entire notion of celibacy was initially introduced as a challenge to humanity that has since been taken too far. Priests of any religion shouldn't be expected to be celibate; after all, they should represent the pinnacle of whatever society they serve, right? Celibacy is nothing more than an extremist reaction to a common social 'ill': perversity.

But religion would do better to recognize and understand the varying breadth of human sexual and emotional desire, and embrace them. But that would be dangerous, wouldn't it, since anything that is 'natural' to humanity is therefor animalistic, and basic. The domain of the Devil, so to speak.

Wait, that sounds like the thinking of a cultist. ;)

Didn't someone once say that all religions began as cults?
 
Celibacy is nothing more than an extremist reaction to a common social 'ill': perversity.

Yeah, so let's take this group of men who are acting to suppress their basic, primal, NATURAL urges and provide them with a crop of innocent youth. How fucking stupid is that?
 
Gee, let's take the strongest biological urge known to humankind and attempt to completely stifle it in the name of piety. Psychologically, I think that's a recipe for perversion.

Isn't this what they've been doing since the dawn of their existence? And not only among the clergy but among their parishioners as well.
 
Yeah, so let's take this group of men who are acting to suppress their basic, primal, NATURAL urges and provide them with a crop of innocent youth. How fucking stupid is that?

From the religious point of view, it's a test of devotion. To see who can withstand the stresses of desire.

What the Church expects (and not only the Catholic church) is an inhuman level of willpower. I suppose, by such standards, saints are made. :rolleyes:
 
I started a long post but...

it boils down to them causing all this noise to distract people from their own transgressions.

Are we sure W. isn't catholic?
 
I started a long post but...

it boils down to them causing all this noise to distract people from their own transgressions.

Are we sure W. isn't catholic?

Nah, he's one of them snake kissing baptists.
 
And "using" children for this testing is just fucking wrong.

Of course it is. I'd be first in line for the lynching, if it came down to it.

But what the Church expects, and what they endeavor to accomplish, flies in the face of what most human beings are willing to give. I doubt there are too many priests out there who truly understand that serving 'the Lord' means trading their own natural humanity in favor of mythical perfection.
 
Isn't this what they've been doing since the dawn of their existence? And not only among the clergy but among their parishioners as well.

Celibacy was introduced into the Catholic Church during the dark ages so as to curb the rampant STD's among the priesthood.
 
Celibacy was introduced into the Catholic Church during the dark ages so as to curb the rampant STD's among the priesthood.

That's interesting, I wasn't aware of that. However, it doesn't change the fact that the church has practiced a doctrine of guilt for centuries over things like sexual desire and sex for any reason other than procreation.

Other denominations, while certainly just as culpable of fostering that same guilt doctrine, do allow their ministers, priests, pastors, etc. to marry and have sex.
 
Celibacy was introduced into the Catholic Church during the dark ages so as to curb the rampant STD's among the priesthood.

I thought it had more to do with property rights. Married priests wanted their children to inherit church property while the church wanted to keep the property. STDs may have been a gift from the Americas. The first syphilis outbreak occurred in 1495; priests went celibate a few centuries before that.
 
Makes sense. The queers are bankrupting the Church. But the Episcopal Church is always hot for gays, so they'll find work quickly.
 
Back
Top