Irony: The Republican Party wants change.....

islandman

Joined
Apr 10, 2001
Posts
66,708
...from a Republican White House in power for the past eight years!

That's what I call irony.
 
It will be change....anything is better than Clintons or Bushes in the white house! Almost 20 years of NO CHANGE!
 
He only voted with Bush 90%

BAM voted 97% with the DUMZ

Who then is CHANGE?:D
 
1) A Democratic Party-controlled White House.


Pretty much sums it up, I think.

He only voted with Bush 90%

BAM voted 97% with the DUMZ

Who then is CHANGE


This KILLS the thread!

WHO IS THE REAL CHANGE AGENT?
 
Obamas plan for Change? He plans to take a magic carpet ride to Iran, Iraq and Russia and save the world like superman with his sad stories of how bad whites treated blacks in America 120 years ago! LOL
 
Irony is the party that twice elected the multimillionaire son of a President calling the son of a single mother who needed food stamps to eat and student loans to go to college an Elitist.
 
Irony is the party that twice elected the multimillionaire son of a President calling the son of a single mother who needed food stamps to eat and student loans to go to college an Elitist.

Damn straight.

Why would anybody call a multimillionare Harvard graduate who taught at the University of Chicago, and can't bowl to save his life, an Elitist?
 
Damn straight.

Why would anybody call a multimillionare Harvard graduate who taught at the University of Chicago, and can't bowl to save his life, an Elitist?

You know, of course, that you're arguing with an idiot?

Ishmael
 
Irony is the party that twice elected the multimillionaire son of a President calling the son of a single mother who needed food stamps to eat and student loans to go to college an Elitist.

Incidentally, the multimillionaire son of a President couldn't manage a baseball team, but people thought him fit to manage a country for two terms.

That's called comedy.
 
Then if Obama wins, you're going to vote for a republican the next time around, right?

Ishmael

If I feel the Republican is the right candidate, why not? Are you having trouble understanding this because you vote for the party and not for the individual?
 
If I feel the Republican is the right candidate, why not? Are you having trouble understanding this because you vote for the party and not for the individual?

Hmmmm, I thought this was about change for the sake of change. Apparently it's not. You now claim the right of discernment between one candidate or the other. As opposed to your prior statement that, "They're all the same."

I must say that your conflicting positions have me confused.

Ishmael
 
Back
Top