Can a woman take a man's complete package vaginally?

[uptoplay2]

A friend and I are discussing the possibility of her taking my cock and balls inside her pussy. She thinks one possible position would be with reverse cowgirl. We are both intrigued with what the feelings would be and also how it would look. Not much movement would be possible...

Has anyone else had these thoughts? Are there other ways to approach the problem?

Has anyone managed to do it??

 

[Dreamliner]

Hey utp.

I have tried this with various partners over the years and have never been successful. The best achieved was full cock and half the scrotum..but the flexibility required was nearly extreme.

Tried all sorts of positions......interestingly women seem keen to attempt this as a few asked for us to try, rather than me initiating the topic.

I would be very interested in hearing from anybody that has been successful.

 

[uptoplay2]

Happy I'm not alone

Hey utp.

I have tried this with various partners over the years and have never been successful. The best achieved was full cock and half the scrotum..but the flexibility required was nearly extreme.

Tried all sorts of positions......interestingly women seem keen to attempt this as a few asked for us to try, rather than me initiating the topic.

I would be very interested in hearing from anybody that has been successful.

I'd be happy to hear from those who had success, but also from those who have tried. The idea that a woman would want to go for it is really hot.

If anyone has seen pics, I would love to see what I've only imagined.

 

[infinity706]

Of course women would go for it. Afterall, women are people with desires, too. It might only apply to a small minority, but probably anything you can come up with there are probably some men and women that like it.

I have to wonder about the practicality of it, though. If you're not careful, you could injure your balls. Afterall, a woman's cunt can squeeze pretty hard.

 

[Violette]

Geez, pleasing one part at a time isn't good enough anymore? How greedy can you get?

 

[uptoplay2]

pretty greedy... but... eager to please

Geez, pleasing one part at a time isn't good enough anymore? How greedy can you get?

I'm offering to GIVE more.... at some bodily risk ... as was pointed out!
I don't think there would be any movement so the woman would have the man trapped... I'm not sure who would be the "greedy" one, but I'm willing to wait as she (or we) manipulate this or that to get her to where she wants to be.

 

[Dreamliner]

Geez, pleasing one part at a time isn't good enough anymore? How greedy can you get?

It is not so much wanting more.....rather it is more about experimenting and fun. I know the times it has arisen with me is with two people that are very sexually tuned into each other and enjoying each other for who they are and what each provides to the other.

It is about joint sexual fulfilment, not a unilateral one directional sexual gratification kick for the male.

 

[uptoplay2]

grin...

Geez, pleasing one part at a time isn't good enough anymore? How greedy can you get?

not as greedy as you were to get even for not having your fun.... course... waking up to that sort of payback would be very nice! http://www.literotica.com/stories/showstory.php?id=166163

All I'm doing here I am offering you my balls.... I guess in the end, no one would really have the balls... or a cock....

 

[VelvetDarkness]

I haven't tried this but I imagine it would depend rather a bit on the size of the cock and the natural depth of the pussy. It might be more a question of physical compatibility than some mythical, secret technique.

 

[greeneyed_Lady]

What about if you do a little cbt to keep things bound tightly and together??

 

[uptoplay2]

What about if you do a little cbt to keep things bound tightly and together??

That might be good. Have you tried it? Seen pictures? If you bind them, they still have to feel her pressure. I do a agree that getting them in without anything would be difficult.... perhaps painfull....but in the end fun!

 

[greeneyed_Lady]

I have seen pictures of the testicles being bound into a second fallus... but not combined with the penis... I haven't tried it myself... want to.. have someone willing.. distance and time being what it is..

 

[uptoplay2]

I'm more interested now..

I was darn close... my balls were buried between her lips, but I forgot entirely about this little mystery... so I didn't make an attempt to press them in.... felt marvelous to be that tight though .... in a scissored position. Maybe next time...?

 

[rthnck]

here is a video with dick in pussy, balls in ass. I would guess this position would be a good one to try to make this happen with both in the pussy. I think the idea of using some testicle bondage may be helpful as well or just have an enormous hanging sack like this guy....

http://www.redtube.com/4590

 

[bellinda69]

A friend and I are discussing the possibility of her taking my cock and balls inside her pussy. She thinks one possible position would be with reverse cowgirl. We are both intrigued with what the feelings would be and also how it would look. Not much movement would be possible...

Has anyone else had these thoughts? Are there other ways to approach the problem?

Has anyone managed to do it??

Stas: The average women's vagina is only 5 inches deep (maybe they need to redo the study). Go figure

 

[greeneyed_Lady]

Belinda, the average vagina can stretch to accomodate a variety of lengths and widths. I've had partners that were anywhere from 5" long and 1 1/4" thick to 9" (actually I think he was closer to 10" but I never measured) long and over 2" thick.

At *rest* the vagina is shortened, say 3-4" but during arousal it does something called tenting where it lengthens and opens slightly in preparation for intercourse.

 

[uptoplay2]

tenting?

Belinda, the average vagina can stretch to accomodate a variety of lengths and widths. I've had partners that were anywhere from 5" long and 1 1/4" thick to 9" (actually I think he was closer to 10" but I never measured) long and over 2" thick.

At *rest* the vagina is shortened, say 3-4" but during arousal it does something called tenting where it lengthens and opens slightly in preparation for intercourse.

So... men "tent" out and women "tent" in?? Part of the problem is that some of these measurements and "judgements" are made by doctors who are looking at women who have long passed the point of being aroused....

Someone posted that a women there has no place to store fluid... therefore any squirting or gushing must be urine. Well..... perhaps when the body was living it would be easier to figure out what was really happening. I'm not sure I care. Women are amazing. How they do it can remain a mystery as long as they keep assuring the poor guys with only 5' that they are just as good as the 9' guys.

And for the record... putting my package into a woman's anus... looked painful for all concerned. I guess it would stay put though.

 

[greeneyed_Lady]

Yup... many measurements are done in a clinical setting, during times of non-arousal... like for a routine gyno exam for example. Some women find that to be arousing, some find it to be the opposite. I can't say that I find it arousing before hand.. but afterwards I know I'm ready to jump my man... perhaps it's the 2 days of knowing I have to abstain from sex (my rule, not necessarily what has to be done).

Doing research on dead bodies, while beneficial in some regards, I think misses a lot of things that are only apparent in living bodies.

And I hope to god that you meant 5" and 9" and not 5' and 9'!!! Not even I can stretch that much!!!

 

[uptoplay2]

No... I made a mistake..

Yup... many measurements are done in a clinical setting, during times of non-arousal... like for a routine gyno exam for example. Some women find that to be arousing, some find it to be the opposite. I can't say that I find it arousing before hand.. but afterwards I know I'm ready to jump my man... perhaps it's the 2 days of knowing I have to abstain from sex (my rule, not necessarily what has to be done).

Doing research on dead bodies, while beneficial in some regards, I think misses a lot of things that are only apparent in living bodies.

And I hope to god that you meant 5" and 9" and not 5' and 9'!!! Not even I can stretch that much!!!

I would have to speak whale if I was talking in feet, and even then, it would be impossible given I would have no blood in my body ... (Good eye, "Lovely Lady")

 

[Cathleen]

Can a woman take a man's complete package vaginally?

What is the return policy? What if I don't have the receipt, would I get a credit?

I've never heard of this activity. What else have you and your friend be discussing? Creative thoughts are great.

 

[WriterDom]

I'm sure many women could but the hard part is on the man. I'm happy to keep my boys swinging free.

 

[uptoplay2]

I don't know...

I'm sure many women could but the hard part is on the man. I'm happy to keep my boys swinging free.

With a think cock ring (ok.. it's a kid's Live-Strong band... or two of them).. below by sack... it's lifted pretty good... and the little guys can't escape whatever they might be forced into.... not too much discomfort from squeezing... actually.. it feels good.

 

[ravi64]

gave such an idea a try once when i was younger but did not succeed tell me the result if you do

 

[intriguess]

okay i admit i thought y? but the clip of guy with cock in her pussy and balls in her ass, that was hot, unfortunately my current partner is way too conservative for me to even consider asking.

oh well I'll just put it on my someday list

 

[uptoplay2]

did a little experiment...

okay i admit i thought y? but the clip of guy with cock in her pussy and balls in her ass, that was hot, unfortunately my current partner is way too conservative for me to even consider asking.

oh well I'll just put it on my someday list

the idea of using a cock ring below the sack works.... but the resulting package is very very thick... not sure it would feel too bad to be squeezed though. The problem would be to get something over everything that would bind it... but still allow the sensations to get through..