I said there would be a panic. Ok now who's stupid enough to deny it has happened?

Le Jacquelope

Loves Spam
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Posts
76,445
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080716...c&printer=1;_ylt=AlIOgggOKyHY79zNxA8tK6qb.HQA

SEC issues emergency rule to curb short sales

By Rachelle Younglai and Emily ChasanTue Jul 15, 10:51 PM ET

U.S. securities regulators issued an emergency rule on Tuesday to limit certain types of short selling in major financial firms, including Fannie Mae (FNM.N) and Freddie Mac (FRE.N).

The rule is the latest effort by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to clamp down on market manipulation that some blame for the sharp declines in financial stocks and the demise of investment bank Bear Stearns in March.

The rule will go into effect on Monday, July 21, and last through July 29, although it could be extended to last up to 30 days. The SEC said it will consider rules to address short selling issues across the entire stock market.

The emergency rule applies to 19 financial firms including Lehman Brothers (LEH.N), Goldman Sachs (GS.N), Merrill Lynch (MER.N), Morgan Stanley (MS.N), JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) and Citigroup Inc (C.N).

The SEC said that a loss of confidence in markets can lead to panic selling, which may be further exacerbated by certain types of short selling.

"As a result, the prices of securities may artificially and unnecessarily decline well below the price level that would have resulted from the normal price discovery process," the SEC said. "If significant financial institutions are involved, this chain of events can threaten disruption of our markets."

Short sellers arrange to borrow shares they consider overvalued and sell them in hopes of making profit when the price drops.

With financial stocks dropping dramatically over the year, lawmakers have been calling on the SEC to investigate whether short sellers and speculators are behind the move.

Over the weekend, the SEC announced plans to crack down on false rumors and said it is examining whether broker dealers and investment advisers have controls in place to prevent market manipulation.

The agency's rule change would prevent investors from making "naked" short sales of the biggest financial stocks. A "naked" short sale occurs when an investor sells stock that has not yet been borrowed.

Broker-dealers will sometimes accidentally fail to deliver stocks to investors who have arranged to borrow a stock. If it is done intentionally, it is illegal.

"Today's commission action aims to stop unlawful manipulation through naked short selling that threatens the stability of financial institutions," SEC Chairman Christopher Cox said in a statement.

The emergency rule would require a short seller to borrow the securities before executing the sale. It would also require the investor to deliver the securities on the settlement date.

"The new rule will benefit the investment community and help bring more stability to the market," said Dylan Wetherill, president and founder of short interest tracking service ShortSqueeze.com.

"This rule would help relieve the extreme downward pressure on stocks that has helped fuel the market down to these levels," he said.

As of June 30, short sellers held about 14 percent of Fannie's outstanding stock, up from around 3 percent last August. For the same period, shorts held almost 12 percent of Freddie's outstanding stock, up from about 2.7 percent. They also held about 10 percent of Lehman's stock, up from 4.5 percent.

Short sellers say they prevent stocks from becoming overvalued and are an essential feature of the market.

"While no one in Washington did their job, now they are trying to blame short sellers," said William Fleckenstein, president of Fleckenstein Capital, which manages a Seattle-based hedge fund.

"Short sellers don't make stocks go down. If a short seller was trying to push a stock to a price where it didn't belong, it would come back right away," said Fleckenstein, who is not currently short the investment banks or Fannie or Freddie. He had a short position on Fannie, which he covered on Tuesday.

Earlier, Cox told a Senate Banking Committee hearing that the emergency rule would be more effective than the so-called tick test rule, which was repealed June 2007.

The tick test rule only allowed short sales when the last sale price was higher than the previous price. That meant a trader could not short a stock if the movement prior to the short sale was down.

Cox said the SEC is going to look at whether some other kind of a price test might be useful for "circumstances such as those we find ourselves in now."

"We are very open to that," said Cox.

The tick test rule, adopted a decade after the 1929 stock market crash, was designed to prevent short sellers from adding to the downward pressure on a stock that is already falling sharply.

The SEC has already proposed another rule to curb naked short selling abuses and prevent market price manipulation. It is not known when the SEC will adopt this rule.

The agency identified the following securities affected by its order:

* BNP Paribas Securities Corp (BNPQF.PK) (BNPQY.PK)

* Bank of America Corp (BAC.N)

* Barclays PLC (BCS.N)

* Citigroup Inc (C.N)

* Credit Suisse Group (CS.N)

* Daiwa Securities Group Inc (DSECY.PK)

* Deutsche Bank Group AG (DB.N)

* Allianz SE (AZ.N)

* Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N)

* Royal Bank ADS (RBS.N)

* HSBC Holdings Plc ADS (HBC.N)

* JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N)

* Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc (LEH.N)

* Merrill Lynch & Co Inc (MER.N)

* Mizuho Financial Group Inc (MFG.N)

* Morgan Stanley (MS.N)

* UBS AG (UBS.N)

* Freddie Mac (FRE.N)

* Fannie Mae (FNM.N)

(Reporting by Rachelle Younglai and Emily Chasan; Editing by Tim Dobbyn, Carol Bishopric, Gary Hill)
 
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080716...y&printer=1;_ylt=AtyTgfKwC7oyvruxPe1taApv24cA

Consumer prices jump 1.1 percent in June

By MARTIN CRUTSINGER, AP Economics Writer 28 minutes ago

Consumer prices shot up in June at the second fastest pace in 26 years with two-thirds of the surge blamed on soaring energy prices.

The Labor Department reported that consumer prices jumped 1.1 percent last month, much worse than had been expected. Energy prices rocketed upward by 6.6 percent, reflecting big gains for gasoline, home heating oil and natural gas.

The big rise in prices cut deeply into consumers' earning power with average weekly wages, after adjusting for inflation, dropping by 0.9 percent in June, the biggest monthly decline since 1984.

The 1.1 percent June price increase was the second largest monthly advance in the past 26 years, surpassed only by a 1.3 percent gain in September 2005 from a jolt to energy costs after Hurricane Katrina.

Separately, the Federal Reserve reported that industrial output rose 0.5 percent in June, the fastest pace in 11 months. The increase, the highest since a 0.6 percent gain in July of last year, reflected an end to an automotive production strike rather than any widespread strength in the economy.

The report on retail inflation followed similarly grim news on Tuesday that wholesale prices had shot up by 1.8 percent in June.

The news on inflation kept a lid on stock prices, which were trading mixed after one of the nation's largest banks, Wells Fargo, announced it would raise its dividend.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told Congress on Tuesday that the Fed was concerned about the threats posed by rising inflation.

Bernanke said that the "upside risks to the inflation outlook have intensified lately, as the rising prices of energy and some other commodities have led to a sharp pickup in inflation and some measures of inflation expectations have moved higher."

Bernanke's comments underscored the bind the central bank is in, caught between a faltering economy that is struggling to overcome a prolonged housing slump and a severe credit squeeze, and the risk that inflation would move higher.

Many analysts believe that the central bank is likely to leave interest rates unchanged for the rest of the year out of concern that any tightening of credit policy could send the economy into an even worse tailspin.

Over the past 12 months, consumer inflation is up by 5 percent, the largest year-over-year gain since a similar 5 percent rise in May 1991.

Food prices also showed a big increase in June, rising by 0.7 percent, more than double the 0.3 percent increase of May. Vegetable prices shot up by 6.1 percent, the biggest increase in nearly three years.

Core inflation, which excludes energy and food, showed rising pressures too with an increase of 0.3 percent in June, up from a 0.2 percent gain in May and the biggest one-month rise since January.

This increase reflected a 4.5 percent jump in airline ticket prices, the biggest one-month rise for airline fares since March 2000.

(This version CORRECTS headline and lede to show that June increase second fastest in 26 years, reflecting government error. )
 
Posting full articles regardless of citation is considered plagerism and is frowned upon--a few sentences is acceptable to most publishers (Omit AP) or links and a descriptive passage are acceptable.
 
Been seeing a lot of this happen in connection with the US Government. When things don't go their way they just change the rules in the middle of the game so they "win"

Lame.
 
Posting full articles regardless of citation is considered plagerism and is frowned upon--a few sentences is acceptable to most publishers (Omit AP) or links and a descriptive passage are acceptable.
Okay. Objection duly noted. I'm still gonna be posting full articles to document and support my claims.
 
Nobody is claiming that there's a panic - besides Le Jerque, that is.
 
Posting full articles regardless of citation is considered plagerism and is frowned upon--a few sentences is acceptable to most publishers (Omit AP) or links and a descriptive passage are acceptable.

To be a stickler for definitions, it's actually not plagiarism.

It is, however, copyright infringement. Chances are, though, they're really not going to go after him, especially since he cited the source.
 
Well there was a run on a California bank yesterday that I saw on the nightly news. I'm not sure if it was LT they were interviewing or not.
It must have been all the Literoticans who had accounts at the credit union he claims to work at.
 
Just a note... many traders use computers to do all their trading now days and there are automated programs that trade based on stock, commodities, or bond movement. When a general drop like what's occurring today and over the last few days happens, those programs begin to do their stuff, what their designed to do... sell off the item and retain the gain (if any) or stop loss before the loss it too much.



There is more of that in this particular market than at any time in history, so in effect, computers are causing most of the drop over the last few days.

Admittedly though, the trader can interject commands to do otherwise as well. So many are trading so much though... it's hard to keep track without using the computer trading like they do. I think you'll see things settle down and calm down before week's end... if not then, by the end of next week.

Personal opinion which doesn't really matter in the long run.
 
Back
Top