The Post Will Happily Name Every Adult Caught in a Dog Collar

LittleJade

Literotica Guru
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Posts
11,030
(I'm copying and pasting from a thread in the GB)

“The Post will happily name every adult caught in a dog collar.”

Posted by Dan Savage on February 13 at 11:56 AM

That’s what a New York Post spokesperson, Howard Rubenstein, told Jeff Bercovici at Portfolio.com. Bercovici called the Post—and me—after the New York City tabloid ran a story in which they named the 67 year-old that almost choked to death in a bondage-scene-gone-wrong at the famous Nutcracker Suite last week. Not only did the Post name the man, a retired college professor, it also called his wife and told her the news. Says Bercovici:

Paying for erotic favors is okay, as long as your tastes are generic. That, in a nutshell, is the sexual ethic of the New York Post. How else do you explain a paper where the top editors hang out at strip clubs at night and spend their days shaming fetish-club patrons by name?

I refer to coverage of the 67-year-old man who had to be hospitalized after an accident at the hands of a dominatrix in a Manhattan establishment called the Nutcracker Suite. Today, the Post crossed into ethically murky territory with a story that named the man (citing “law-enforcement sources”), and described his professional history, hometown and family situation. For good measure, the Post’s reporters also took it upon themselves to phone the man’s wife and fill her in on the details.

Since the man is not a celebrity, politician or other public figure, it’s hard to understand what kind of news value the Post’s editors saw in printing his name, or what they accomplished beyond embarrassing him in front of his community and ensuring that the episode will forever be his top Google hit.

I tried to ask metro editor Michelle Gotthelf how she justified the decision, but she referred me to the paper’s spokesman, Howard Rubenstein, who offered this statement: “The Post will happily name every adult caught in a dog collar.”
Well, today the Post has another piece about this guy—and this time they’ve not only got the man’s picture, but an interview with him. The Post:

The kinky college professor who was almost strangled during an S&M session at a Midtown club told The Post yesterday he’s deeply ashamed and is finally through with the double life he’s lived since he was kid. “I don’t want this to spoil my marriage,” said Robert Benjamin, 67, still disoriented from the three days he spent in a coma but sitting upright in a chair in his room at St. Vincent’s Hospital.

“I don’t want my wife to leave me, but I have to tell her the truth,” he said. “I’m going to share everything with her. I think my family will forgive me.”



Where to begin? How about with the ethics of interviewing a man that’s still disoriented after three days in a coma? Or naming a man that isn’t a public figure, broke no laws, and hasn’t been charged with any crime?

It seems to me that if the Post is going to declare war on kinksters—they’ll “happily name every adult caught in a dog collar,” they’ll out you as a kinkster to your family, they’ll run triumphant pieces about how you’ve learned your lesson and you’re going to give up your kinks for good (as if it were that simple)—then kinksters ought to declare war on the Post. The Post is a large news operation in one of the most sexually liberated cities on the planet. Not only are there kinky people on the Post’s staff, but I’m thinking odds are good that more than one Post exec has has patronized the Nutcracker Suite. (Wealthy white men make up 99.9% of the Nutcracker Suite’s clientele, after all.) If a happy, healthy, pissed off kinkster out there has evidence that a Post exec or an exec at the News Corporation—Rupert Murdoch? one of his moderately hot sons?—has ever been “caught in a dog collar,” now would be a good time to share it with media.

Because, hey, if you’re kinky, then you deserve to be outed, shamed, humiliated, and bullied into pledging to give up your “addiction” to whatever your kinks might be—those are the Post’s standards. The people that run and own the Post ought to be held to ‘em.

Link
 
Outrageous. There's just no place to even start with this.

I dunno, one way to read this would be as a contract. If the Post will happily name every adult caught in a dog collar, then perhaps every single adult who's ever worn a dog collar, and anyone else who wants to join the movement, ought to send a photo and a name, and DEMAND that the Post publish it. They DID say they'd be happy to do so.

That was certainly my first instinct - buy a collar, snap photos of about 25 different willing people in it, and send it with a demand that it be published in the Post or we'll sue. After all, they promised.

Maybe they'd have a lot less room for crap like this, then.

bj
 
I know.

I haven't yet gathered my disbelief/rage together, for me to make a good comment on this yet...



but I will.
 
Outrageous. There's just no place to even start with this.

I dunno, one way to read this would be as a contract. If the Post will happily name every adult caught in a dog collar, then perhaps every single adult who's ever worn a dog collar, and anyone else who wants to join the movement, ought to send a photo and a name, and DEMAND that the Post publish it. They DID say they'd be happy to do so.

That was certainly my first instinct - buy a collar, snap photos of about 25 different willing people in it, and send it with a demand that it be published in the Post or we'll sue. After all, they promised.

Maybe they'd have a lot less room for crap like this, then.

bj

*Snort* I like the way your mind works. :devil:
 
Oh, I'm in! It would give me a chance to wear that collar that Beth bought for me right before we split up. lol

Seriously though, I can't begin to express how frustrated/enraged/etc I am about this, and that they would have the nerve to say that and name that guy and do all that.... But hey, if they have the nerve to say that, maybe what they need is a good retaliation like bj suggested. Beat them at their own game in a way.

Or maybe I'm just in too much of a pissy mood to see straight. Either or.


Heather
 
mua ha ha. Thank you.

I'm seriously in if this starts to be a real movement. And I bet I can get about 3 dozen more people from around my area.

We could all send them on the same day.

bj

I like this. I could get more than a few photos.
 
I'm bumping this. I don't really want to just leave these people alone; I want to do something.

I'm going to start talking to people around here about getting photos of folks in dog collars. What the hell - one could choose to be masked if necessary; you're still an adult in a dog collar, right?

I figure I'll collect a bunch from my area and send them all in one big packet. I might also send an email to Dan Savage to let him know I'm doing it. Perhaps he'll put it in his column.

one never knows.

bj
 
I'm bumping this. I don't really want to just leave these people alone; I want to do something.

I'm going to start talking to people around here about getting photos of folks in dog collars. What the hell - one could choose to be masked if necessary; you're still an adult in a dog collar, right?

I figure I'll collect a bunch from my area and send them all in one big packet. I might also send an email to Dan Savage to let him know I'm doing it. Perhaps he'll put it in his column.

one never knows.

bj

i think you should jump on it. esp. since a just a spokesperson at the paper made the statement. i'm pretty sure if their news room were to be flooded with thousands of photos of random regular people in dog collars the executives would be a little less inclined to support these antics.
 
~Viva la Revolucion~

I think it's a smashing idea. Ok, that and it gives me an excuse to wear a collar. :D

Seriously though, when someone makes such an idiotic statement he should be taught what the consequences can be. The media is full of sensationalizing what people consider the macabre or the perverse. Is it news? Hmm, let's see unrest across the globe, droughts, satellite full of toxic fuel scheduled to be shot down, choices to make on who to vote for in the election...sorry, but I don't think I can in all good conscience include in the same category the name of a man who decided to act on his fantasies. Truthfully, he needs to contact a lawyer about the HIPPA laws that were violated. He would have a hell of a lawsuit based on that alone.
 
Back
Top