Approval ratings...

The opposite of socialism- taking money from the poor and giving it to the rich- is a hallmark of Trump's economic policies.

Oh look who doesn't know what the fuck socialism is. Not all shocking.

Actually, it's been typical of many Republican administrations going all the way back to Ronald Reagan.

No it's not. You're lying.

Lets cut taxes for the rich.

Exactly as suspected. Not stealing from the rich isn't taking from the poor, you aboslute lunatic.

What does the Jesus say about THAT?? I'm pretty sure He does not endorse such policies.

Like you give a fuck about anything Jesus had to say. Also as a theif promoting theft, you don't have much room to talk.
 
The one he LOST, three times, but got away with cheating in 2024?

Seriously, if the 2024 election was investigated to the same degree as 2020 was, he'd be sitting in jail where he belongs, not the white house.

If the courts had done their job prior to that, remained independant and loyal to the Constitution, instead of negligent, hyper partisan and corrupt, he'd be sitting in jail where he belongs, not the white house.

There is no way he won in 2024. No way. The American people aren't as stupid as the Icanhelp/Latecomer/Hisarpy guy presents himself as, or as you Russian bots imagine us to be.
Grow the fuck up already. :)
 
The closest approximation to democratic socialism that I like is Social Democracy. Social Democracy includes socialized medicine. Socialized medicant costs less than the American medical system and gets getter results.

"Socialized medicine" is inevitably rationed medicine. Which is why monopolies on government health care like we saw in the UK and Canada have given way to government care alongside private care for those who can afford it.

Canada's government leaders routinely escaped their health care monopoly to get needed treatment in the USA:

https://www.medpagetoday.com/cardiology/acutecoronarysyndrome/18279

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/pol...eave-from-cabinet-role-after-being-diagnosed/
 
"Socialized medicine" is inevitably rationed medicine. Which is why monopolies on government health care like we saw in the UK and Canada have given way to government care alongside private care for those who can afford it.

Canada's government leaders routinely escaped their health care monopoly to get needed treatment in the USA:

https://www.medpagetoday.com/cardiology/acutecoronarysyndrome/18279

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/pol...eave-from-cabinet-role-after-being-diagnosed/
If one can afford the best, health care in Canada may be better than in the United States. What about average citizens?
 
Thanks for proving that the left can't cope with demcoracy
It's the GOP who can't handle democracy. You can tell because they're the ones doing voter suppression. Every time they say "voter fraud" (they know very well there is none) it is an admission of weakness -- they no longer feel confident they can win fair and square, by convincing a majority of the people of the value of their policies.
 
It's the GOP who can't handle democracy.

"NO YOU!!!" LOL....we aren't the ones predending "democracy" means we get our way all the way at all times and also some ULTRA SACRED value that we hold dear, until the people vote otherwise then democracy is FASCISM!!!!! LOL

We've always been for restricting democracy so it's not hypocritical or a flip flop for us to be for restricting democracy.........

You can tell because they're the ones doing voter suppression.

Deporting illegals and enforcing laws isn't voter suppression.

Every time they say "voter fraud" (they know very well there is none) it is an admission of weakness -- they no longer feel confident they can win fair and square, by convincing a majority of the people of the value of their policies.

Tells us more about how we have to let the entire 3rd world in and shower them with ALL the welfare and benefits or Democracy is OVER!!! LOL
 
"NO YOU!!!" LOL....we aren't the ones predending "democracy" means we get our way all the way at all times and also some ULTRA SACRED value that we hold dear, until the people vote otherwise then democracy is FASCISM!!!!! LOL

We've always been for restricting democracy so it's not hypocritical or a flip flop for us to be for restricting democracy.........



Deporting illegals and enforcing laws isn't voter suppression.



Tells us more about how we have to let the entire 3rd world in and shower them with ALL the welfare and benefits or Democracy is OVER!!! LOL
All of New England has one republican in congress, that would be Senator Collins. Dems can't bitch about gerrymandering.
 

No it's not, it's fraud supression.

If there is no fraud then there is no problem with asking for ID, should hurt Democrat votes at all to ensure no illegals are here voting the American citizen out of their wealth. But it doesn't the very notion sends you globo-commies to the fucking moon.

The USA has EVERY RIGHT to use democracy to secure it's democracy. The only people that upsets are the bad actors.

NOBODY comes here for welfare.

Then why are nearly if not all democrats and the rest of the world screeming and wailing like it's the 2nd great Nazi holocaust that they've been cut off from it??? :D

That math doesn't math buddy....nobody, no political parties nor nations have a 10+ year nuclear meltdown over losing nothing.
 
"Socialized medicine" is inevitably rationed medicine. Which is why monopolies on government health care like we saw in the UK and Canada have given way to government care alongside private care for those who can afford it.

Stable genius doesn’t realize that Medicare is “socialized medicine” (universal healthcare) for the elderly (the age group that uses the most healthcare).

Tell us about how Medicare rations healthcare. Give specific examples. 👍
 
Then why are nearly if not all democrats and the rest of the world screeming and wailing like it's the 2nd great Nazi holocaust that they've been cut off from it??? :D
They aren't. Welfare pretty much came to an end in the Clinton years, and any squawking has long since died down.
 
And, historically, you were always wrong about that -- whether the restrictions were based on property qualifications, or sex, or race.

You do realize that, don't you?

How were we wrong?

Universal sufferage has shown to be a horrible idea.

Just look what the last 100 years has done to the USA. Now it's the longhouse of Karens and their feminized cucks.
 
Last edited:
How were we wrong?

Universal sufferage has shown to be a horrible idea.

Just look what the last 100 years has done to the USA. Now it's the longhouse of Karens and their feminized cucks.
How was the country any worse off for enfranchising the propertyless? Or women? Or blacks?

The USA is a LOT better now than it was 100 years ago. And not only because of technological progress.
 
Back
Top