Epstein Emails Released. Trump is a Pedophile.

🙄

Translation / proper interpretation:

Lazaran’s comment scored a direct hit and wounded ineedhelp1 (a sexual predator supporting / protecting POS MAGAt) deeply.

I will be sure to post more comments just like that one.

👍

👉 ineedhelp1 🤣

🇺🇸

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
This is how fucking emotional you are you fucking idiot. You accuse me of being a sexual predator. How do you breath with your head so far up your ass?
 
Democrats have been involved in a modern day lynching of Trump and anyone associated with him since 2015.

Your concern for the Epstein files is nothing more than TDS on steroids. Democrats aren't interested in justice. You've wanted Trump's head on a platter at all cost, rule of law be damned.

Trump's been a friend of Epstein during the 1990s and because of that association he's been labelled a pedophile, no legal foundation for that accusation.
How very naive.
 
This is how fucking emotional you are you fucking idiot. You accuse me of being a sexual predator. How do you breath with your head so far up your ass?

🙄

ineedhelp1 is so “fucking emotional” that they misread my comment.

👎

I actually called ineedhelp1 “a sexual predator SUPPORTING / PROTECTING POS MAGAt).

DonOld is the sexual predator, and ineedhelp1 is SUPPORTING / PROTECTING him.

Hope that ^ helps.

👍

👉 ineedhelp1 🤣

🇺🇸

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
My lynching post was all about how democrats don't believe in the rule of law, prefer guilty BEFORE the facts are made available.

Ahem! Just a quick and casual search…

Trump was spot on with the Biden corruption scheme at Burisma.

Biden and his cronies lost track of hundreds of thousands of migrant children. Maybe dig into the Clinton foundation. There's enough compelling evidence to charge Joe Biden and his crime family with all sorts of criminal behavior.

I don't think people understand how impactful this testimony will be. If it is found that FISA applications were based on fraudulent pretense and the FBI defrauded the courts the whole scheme could find itself in court. The entire Mueller report could come under some intense scrutiny and even found unconstitutional. It will tie in the Ukraine, crowdstrike, the Clintons, the DNC as well as the Obama admin's NSA, DOJ and FBI. This has the potential to permeate right into the democratic house, Schiff and Nadler as fact witnesses. It all comes back to the Steele dossier and not admitting exculpatory evidence on Carter Page and Papadopoulos. This whole coup I believe, is about to come crashing down on dems just in time for the 2020 elections. Then you have Sidney Powell and the massaging of Flynn's FBI 302s and possible entrapment violations. And then there's the Durham investigation. I think there is a lot of shit about to hit the fan.

Your assumptions are many.
Your assumptions are long winded.
Your assumptions are frequently wrong.
I would say that your assumptions imply that you suffer from an undisclosed derangement.
 
The "victim" in the emails has a name, as a matter of fact her name was explicit in the emails. "Victim" was edited in to create drama. Anyway, the lady in question has already testified in open court and as a matter of public record as to what went on in the Epstein compounds and also to Trump's NON-INVOLVEMENT in any of the activities therein.

Someone in the media or some public figure is going to go just a tad too far like the OP of this thread and the lawsuit hammer is going to come down hard. Talk about weaving the rope that you're going to be hung with. :rolleyes:
 
The "victim" in the emails has a name, as a matter of fact her name was explicit in the emails. "Victim" was edited in to create drama. Anyway, the lady in question has already testified in open court and as a matter of public record as to what went on in the Epstein compounds and also to Trump's NON-INVOLVEMENT in any of the activities therein.

Someone in the media or some public figure is going to go just a tad too far like the OP of this thread and the lawsuit hammer is going to come down hard. Talk about weaving the rope that you're going to be hung with. :rolleyes:
That a boy, let it all out.

Serenity now!
 
The "victim" in the emails has a name, as a matter of fact her name was explicit in the emails. "Victim" was edited in to create drama. Anyway, the lady in question has already testified in open court and as a matter of public record as to what went on in the Epstein compounds and also to Trump's NON-INVOLVEMENT in any of the activities therein.

Someone in the media or some public figure is going to go just a tad too far like the OP of this thread and the lawsuit hammer is going to come down hard. Talk about weaving the rope that you're going to be hung with. :rolleyes:

These victims, some who were underage, STILL require protection from the likes of you.
Here’s Jen Psaki explaining it better:

Donald Trump and his defenders have responded to the newly released tranche of Jeffrey Epstein documents by seeking to discredit any references to Trump that they contain, including by exposing the redacted name of Epstein victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre and treating her cherry-picked remarks as if they exonerate Trump of any wrongdoing. Sky and Amanda Roberts, Giuffre's brother and sister-in-law, talk with Jen Psaki about their outrage at Trump defenders trying to hijack her story for their political purposes while ignoring the crimes and the survivors seeking justice.

https://www.msnbc.com/the-briefing-...jacking-epstein-victim-s-remarks-252029509618
 
The "victim" in the emails has a name, as a matter of fact her name was explicit in the emails. "Victim" was edited in to create drama. Anyway, the lady in question has already testified in open court and as a matter of public record as to what went on in the Epstein compounds and also to Trump's NON-INVOLVEMENT in any of the activities therein.

Someone in the media or some public figure is going to go just a tad too far like the OP of this thread and the lawsuit hammer is going to come down hard. Talk about weaving the rope that you're going to be hung with. :rolleyes:
How many pink elephants are in the room with you?
 
Ahem! Just a quick and casual search…


Your assumptions are many.
Your assumptions are long winded.
Your assumptions are frequently wrong.
I would say that your assumptions imply that you suffer from an undisclosed derangement.
Just another confused magat, one who can’t/wont deal with their own contradictory behaviour, trump should be given the benefit of the doubt as he’s not been convicted but it’s free rein with ICE to not worry about that same rule of law being given to those they round up.
No wonder they’re perpetually confused.
 
Just another confused magat, one who can’t/wont deal with their own contradictory behaviour, trump should be given the benefit of the doubt as he’s not been convicted but it’s free rein with ICE to not worry about that same rule of law being given to those they round up.
No wonder they’re perpetually confused.
Herd them doggies on back to Mexico. :)
 
Back
Top