Philthy_Phil
I win !
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2021
- Posts
- 12,933
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think maybe you have too many voices talking at once in your head.And when I asked again you told us you did. What’s so confusing about your own answer?
We certainly know who you voted for in the last 3 elections.I think maybe you have too many voices talking at once in your head.![]()
Wrong again. You keep demonstrating just how much you don't know. Maybe run through the possible permutations and take a guess.We certainly know who you voted for in the last 3 elections.
You’re working harder to hide that you voted for Trump 3x than Trump is to hide the Epstein files.Wrong again. You keep demonstrating just how much you don't know. Maybe run through the possible permutations and take a guess.![]()
If I voted for Trump 3x I would say so.You’re working harder to hide that you voted for Trump 3x than Trump is to hide the Epstein files.
But you still haven’t said who you voted for.If I voted for Trump 3x I would say so.![]()
I voted for Trump. For the umpteenth time. What a fucking moron. Lol.But you still haven’t said who you voted for.
You’re working really hard to hide it.
From your own link:Well, well, well…Republicans brought a vote to the house floor today to release the files…Wanna guess who blocked it?
In other words, you have only the Republicans' word that it was the Dems. Surprise surprise.Womack was restricted by House rules from revealing which party blocked Burchett’s unanimous consent request — but the Tennessee lawmaker, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), and others insisted Democrats stood in the way.
Neither do you, HARPY.You losers never give up, goofy.
What did you read that suggests they enjoyed working for his organisation?'Sitting with an underaged girl" to the left, implies something nefarious going on. Didn't realize sitting with a young girl was a criminal violation. Trump had a few young women working at MAR-A LAGO and from what I read they enjoyed working for his organization.
Nefarious and criminal are two different things and the POTUS shouldn't be involved with either, traitor.implies something nefarious going on. Didn't realize sitting with a young girl was a criminal violation
"A few." Why just a few?Trump had a few young women working at MAR-A LAGO
Link it.and from what I read they enjoyed working for his organization.
'Sitting with an underaged girl" to the left, implies something nefarious going on. Didn't realize sitting with a young girl was a criminal violation. Trump had a few young women working at MAR-A LAGO and from what I read they enjoyed working for his organization.
For an hour this morning, folks seeing Google AI analysis of Trump-Epstein emails got a random Spongebob Squarepants picture between each email summary.
Spongebob Squarepants appears to be better informed than the apologists known as icanthelp and latedeveloper.Maybe I missed something. Please show me your 'proof' that anything in these released emails indicates any pedophile activity by Trump. I've looked, and there is nothing. Nada. Zip. Zero.
Hard facts only - we've had enough of your baseless opinions.
She is probably projecting her own Lolita teen years on all teen girls.Megyn Kelly goes way too far defending pedos She deserves to be cancelled. What a pig.
View attachment 2577552
She has kids, yes?
From your own link:
In other words, you have only the Republicans' word that it was the Dems. Surprise surprise
From that same link you casually glossed over. “Democrats have had this for the last four years, yet never brought it to light”…
Why?
We know you Radicalized are protecting a whole slew of democrats. I’ll say it again. If you had anything credible you’d of used it in the last election.
Keep deflecting.
This will fade by the time we get to the 2026 Midterms.