Epstein Emails Released. Trump is a Pedophile.

[stxjimmy]

He's been drunk posting since 2am. Happiness left his life many moons ago.

His/their choice, the warning signs were long there.

 

[DeluxAuto]

His/their choice, the warning signs were long there.

Let's pray for the unintended victims of his alcohol abuse.

 

[stxjimmy]

Yes, I’m happy and you’re miserable.

And you need to learn to read the room, a skill all deplorables are going to need in the coming months.

 

[DeluxAuto]

The VP thinks babyboozer is a pedo supporter.

 

[stxjimmy]

The VP thinks babyboozer is a pedo supporter.

View attachment 2577327

He says literal, I say actual!

 

[ll74]

Two things:
1. I think releasing the files will result in a lot of people being accused of things, including the current President, who may have not been involved in anything outside of being in Epstein's company for other reasons.
2. People who were adamant about getting files released who have backed off because of the President need to be honest about their hypocrisy.

I've never called for the release of files.....I have called for the President to do what he said he would do and have called out his backpedalling for what it is. And I've called out people who keep deflecting on blaming him for not doing so.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Clinton (h) was quite wrong as an aspiring politician to use the term, but she was right.
And even at this late stage here are a selection of deplorables clinging on to life in a reality free zone.
T&T was also right, just not in the way he imagined.
To still defend trump should embarrass and shame you all.

So, no proof.

 

[icanhelp1]

Believe anything you want. It’s all speculation.

Interesting the democrats decided to redact the victim's name. Could it be she exonerated Trump of misdeeds.

 

[stxjimmy]

So, no proof.

Poor try, just shut up for 6 months.
And in your America (remember ICE) there’s no presumption of innocence before conviction.

 

[icanhelp1]

So, no proof.

Trial by media and guilty by association. That's how democrats roll.

 

[ll74]

Interesting the democrats decided to redact the victim's name. Could it be she exonerated Trump of misdeeds.

Her statement does not exonerate him. It does provide evidence that might lead to exoneration. Either way, without the complete picture, jumping to the conclusions is useless.

And yes, he is innocent until proven guilty.

It's like the flight logs.....being on those logs doesn't mean anything without additional evidence.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Poor try, just shut up for 6 months.

How about stop posting propaganda and lies forever. Lol.

 

[icanhelp1]

They were ignorant and poorly educated and fought the Union to keep slavery and were not living in New York. Let's see if you can work it out.

Democrats still the same.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Trial by media and guilty by association. That's how democrats roll.

Wow!

 

[stxjimmy]

Trial by media and guilty by association. That's how democrats roll.

Liar, that’s how your beloved operates.

 

[stxjimmy]

How about stop posting propaganda and lies forever. Lol.

That would be a good strategy for you, nice and simple.

 

[MajorRewrite]

How about stop posting propaganda and lies forever. Lol.

RockHead, your doublespeak is absurd.

 

[Saint_Ann]

That would be a good strategy for you, nice and simple.

You aren't a native English speaker, are you? Where are you really from? China? Russia?

 

[Rotadom]

Interesting the democrats decided to redact the victim's name. Could it be she exonerated Trump of misdeeds.

It was to protect trump's victim, .

 

[Saint_Ann]

It was to protect trump's victim, .

You didn't read the deposition, did you? Lol.

 

[stxjimmy]

You aren't a native English speaker, are you? Where are you really from? China? Russia?

Mongolia (outer). I think you can do nice and simple, after all that’s all you are.

 

[icanhelp1]

It was to protect trump's victim, .

Wrong answer. The redacted victim already stated Trump was a perfect gentleman. Dems redacted the victim's name to promote a false narrative, *must be guilty by association*. Her statement is exculpatory but facts be damned. Just the democrats using deceptive unethical tactics, more lying by omission and the usual democrat TDS ideology.

 

[stxjimmy]

Wrong answer. The redacted victim already stated Trump was a perfect gentleman. Dems redacted the victim's name to promote a false narrative, *must be guilty by association*. Her statement is exculpatory but facts be damned. Just the democrats using deceptive unethical tactics, more lying by omission and the usual democrat TDS ideology.

Time for you to man up and stop posting images of a lynching. And that post should keep you well away from any discussion of unethical tactics.
You’re a virulent racist and should be avoided for that.

 

[eric_erosfan]

Releasing all of the files is bipartisan. Let all of the facts and names get out there. These people are/were scumbags. Anyone associated with them should face repercussions.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

Wrong answer. The redacted victim already stated Trump was a perfect gentleman. Dems redacted the victim's name to promote a false narrative, *must be guilty by association*. Her statement is exculpatory but facts be damned. Just the democrats using deceptive unethical tactics, more lying by omission and the usual democrat TDS ideology.

This

Also there’s more to the story it appears. Here’s an interview with the wormy Trump hater That is at the center of this.

He was threatened with a lawsuit by the FLOTUS for defamation…maybe it’s in the courts. This may be retribution on his part. He’s all over the board in this interview, accusations and some unintentional cover.

Some things come to mind. If the Radicalized democrats had anything…anything credibly serious, it would have been leaked during the election. That card would have been way too tempting to play. Having to redact the name of Virginia Giuffre shows they’re just attempting to muddy the waters.

We know the names associated with the Lolita Xpress. Just wait till those get drug out and they have to defend themselves…that’s if our “media” will ask the hard questions. I’m betting they only care about “getting” one person…facts be damned.