Charlie Kirk's legacy will be his attempting another bad-faith argument at the moment he was shot

Good afternoon and thank you for directing your attention back to this important thread.
 
Noted that you make claims and can’t back them up.

In addition, you can’t hold your own claims against a single question so you cover up by claiming its “sealioning” and “bad faith questioning.”

Hey.
Just checking in on ya.
You're doin swell! You have the OP on the ropes!
Now go for the kill!
Ask him again to provide you a link.
THERE'S NO WAY he nor anyone else can find that for you to give you the context to the month old story so that you can keep up and understand what everyone else knows.
 
Hey.
Just checking in on ya.
You're doin swell! You have the OP on the ropes!
Now go for the kill!
Ask him again to provide you a link.
THERE'S NO WAY he nor anyone else can find that for you to give you the context to the month old story so that you can keep up and understand what everyone else knows.
Was I talking to you? Are you Rory’s alt or just cock sucker? Chill down.
 
Charlie Kirk spoke to me and said that it's time to talk about victims of gun violence not named "Charlie Kirk"

And that his wife kept increasing the "girth" of her strap on -- he was pretty sure that was going to kill him soon anyway
 
Was I talking to you? Are you Rory’s alt or just cock sucker? Chill down.

Whoa, whoa, whoa. I'm not starting anything. I'm trying to help you here.
For the record, I've never ever had a conversation with him.
I'm just sayin Rory has not posted in hours. Obviously, he's in his crypt rejuvenating off the blood he drew off Saint Ann to torment the board again tomorrow. That's what the RW's here would have you believe, right?
And why are you trampling on my 1a rights anyway? You've really hurt my fweelins and given me a sad.
 
Whoa, whoa, whoa. I'm not starting anything. I'm trying to help you here.
For the record, I've never ever had a conversation with him.
I'm just sayin Rory has not posted in hours. Obviously, he's in his crypt rejuvenating off the blood he drew off Saint Ann to torment the board again tomorrow. That's what the RW's here would have you believe, right?
And why are you trampling on my 1a rights anyway? You've really hurt my fweelins and given me a sad.
Again. Second time. I know you don’t answer questions.

Was I talking to you?
 
Again. Second time. I know you don’t answer questions.

Was I talking to you?
My work schedule at this unnamed nuclear thermodynamics goat milking hospital is such that I am up late at nights. As such, I have lots of free time that I volunteer my voice to those not here in the wee night hours. So, if you close your eyes real tight and imagine, my words will be almost an exact word for word answer to what that member would have said to you.

Ask Rory a question. Go ahead. I will get the answer right, trust me.
 
My work schedule at this unnamed nuclear thermodynamics goat milking hospital is such that I am up late at nights. As such, I have lots of free time that I volunteer my voice to those not able here in the wee night hours. So, if you close your eyes real tight and imagine, my words will be almost an exact word for word answer to what that member would have said to you.

Ask Rory a question. Go ahead. I will get the answer right, trust me.
Weird place you work.

Are you going to answer the question with an answer?
 
Weird place you work.

Are you going to answer the question with an answer?
I answer relevant questions. I am not a deflecting trumper who occupies PB space. That's the sea lioning tactic that you were earlier accused of doing. What I believe you misunderstood from my thread, and it continued on in this one, is that many, if not all, of the left leaning members who post here are very knowledgeable on politics. As such, it is frustrating to have to hold the hand of someone here through to the current news cycle. It is not necessary for you to actually see the Kirk murder without having to know what his last words were about. An easy google search or reading of the event could easily catch one up. THAT is what frustrated Rory as it also frustrated me that you gave such a vanilla answer for the reasons the government is shutdown that it indicates to many here that you really have no idea at all at what the issues are that are at play. Again, you may take this as me insulting you, but I am again, for some reason, being very, very kind to you.

I personally do have a particular distaste for those who, in the age of trump, care to occupy some middle ground space. Now is not the time for such dumbassery. If that continues to be you, then you should get used to receiving my ire as well as those from those on the other side who think bipartisanship is weakness.

Now, do you care to continue to get an answer to your question?
 
I answer relevant questions. I am not a deflecting trumper who occupies PB space. That's the sea lioning tactic that you were earlier accused of doing. What I believe you misunderstood from my thread, and it continued on in this one, is that many, if not all, of the left leaning members who post here are very knowledgeable on politics. As such, it is frustrating to have to hold the hand of someone here through to the current news cycle. It is not necessary for you to actually see the Kirk murder without having to know what his last words were about. An easy google search or reading of the event could easily catch one up. THAT is what frustrated Rory as it also frustrated me that you gave such a vanilla answer for the reasons the government is shutdown that it indicates to many here that you really have no idea at all at what the issues are that are at play. Again, you may take this as me insulting you, but I am again, for some reason, being very, very kind to you.

I personally do have a particular distaste for those who, in the age of trump, care to occupy some middle ground space. Now is not the time for such dumbassery. If that continues to be you, then you should get used to receiving my ire as well as those from those on the other side who think bipartisanship is weakness.

Now, do you care to continue to get an answer to your question?
Maybe not come into the PB “frustrated.” Asking questions is how people learn, talk, and grow as human beings. I have demonstrated very few times being a smart ass or rude. So why would I “sea lion?” I don’t. I ask questions. When I receive, “It’s true and if you can’t support MY claim that I made- you’re a stupid Trumper,” that just makes me not want to ask questions.

I have asked questions to RW and LW. I get more times LW telling me that I’m stupid than RW. I actually cannot think of a single time a RW did it to me.

Moderates can influence the elections, each year. If LW don’t want to communicate nicely their views but RW do, that’s not going to end best for the LW.

Would I like an answer to my question? Yeah.
 
@AnomalyLady

Perhaps one might be this:


“I believe it’s time to exercise the federalization of Washington, DC. Bring in the troops, cut out the crime. Federalize Washington, DC. President Trump has the power to do it. He has exercising home rule over the nation’s capital. Make DC the safest city in America. Bring in the marines. Call in the Insurrection Act. Make the crime go to zero. Use it as an example… How can we call ourselves a superpower when our great capital is a dangerous dump? Beijing isn’t like this. Tokyo’s not like this, but DC is, and it’s because we’re choosing. It’s time to federalize DC, roll in the tanks, bring in the military. Federalize the town, and bring teenage crime to zero.”- Charlie Kirk

I don't find this to be a man of reason or an argument in good faith when it tramples on the separation of governance between national, state, and local levels. Sure, DC is under Fed control as a unique city without representation in the US legal structure. Kirk would be ecstatic over rolling into Portland, Chicago, LA, or any other city with these exact words. That's not American by anyone's standards except for those who would trample on the freedoms of others for their own self-satisfaction.

It's one example. As was mentioned, you only had to Google it to find one.

Kirk's Debates is a short article about one religious news source's feelings about how he targeted his audience.
 
Last edited:
Maybe not come into the PB “frustrated.” Asking questions is how people learn, talk, and grow as human beings. I have demonstrated very few times being a smart ass or rude. So why would I “sea lion?” I don’t. I ask questions. When I receive, “It’s true and if you can’t support MY claim that I made- you’re a stupid Trumper,” that just makes me not want to ask questions.

I have asked questions to RW and LW. I get more times LW telling me that I’m stupid than RW. I actually cannot think of a single time a RW did it to me.

Moderates can influence the elections, each year. If LW don’t want to communicate nicely their views but RW do, that’s not going to end best for the LW.

Would I like an answer to my question? Yeah.
I don't have any answers to soothe your feelings between LW and RW. I do know that the onus is always placed at the feet of the LW to reach out to moderates and RW's. I am not a politician and those attempts bore me. I will give you the answer to 2+2 always and it will be correct whether I whisper it in your ear or scream it at you with expletives - it is still all the same. If you, as a moderate, care for coddling then that means you are subjecting yourself to be open to lies and misinformation because the speaker is stroking your bruised ego. This is the PB board, not a trump rally.
 
@AnomalyLady

Perhaps one might be this:




I don't find this to be a man of reason or an argument in good faith when it tramples on the separation of governance between national, state, and local levels. Sure, DC is under Fed control as a unique city without representation in the US legal structure. Kirk would be ecstatic over rolling into Portland, Chicago, LA, or any other city with these exact words. That's not American by anyone's standards except for those who would trample on the freedoms of others for their own self-satisfaction.

It's one example. As was mentioned, you only had to Google it to find one.
Thank you. I was just asking for one example, by the OP, but I appreciate you giving one.
 
I don't have any answers to soothe your feelings between LW and RW. I do know that the onus is always placed at the feet of the LW to reach out to moderates and RW's. I am not a politician and those attempts bore me. I will give you the answer to 2+2 always and it will be correct whether I whisper it in your ear or scream it at you with expletives - it is still all the same. If you, as a moderate, care for coddling then that means you are subjecting yourself to be open to lies and misinformation because the speaker is stroking your bruised ego. This is the PB board, not a trump rally.
Words, words, words. Not an answer though. @dmallord gave me one though, you can thank him.
 
@AnomalyLady

Perhaps one might be this:




I don't find this to be a man of reason or an argument in good faith when it tramples on the separation of governance between national, state, and local levels. Sure, DC is under Fed control as a unique city without representation in the US legal structure. Kirk would be ecstatic over rolling into Portland, Chicago, LA, or any other city with these exact words. That's not American by anyone's standards except for those who would trample on the freedoms of others for their own self-satisfaction.

It's one example. As was mentioned, you only had to Google it to find one.

Kirk's Debates is a short article about one religious news source's feelings about how he targeted his audience.
I see your edit. Thank you.

So the first quote you gave, how does that relate to “bad faith questioning?” That’s my disconnect.
 
Words, words, words. Not an answer though. @dmallord gave me one though, you can thank him.
I love, LOVE DMallord!
But, to be fair, he also told you, as I initially did, that a simple google search would have given you an answer long ago.

Now sit back, as I do finally get to channel the blood leeching spirit of Rory and say to you: "Why are you triggered? Kirk did not deserve to die, but he was still a terrible human being who had no issues seeing children being victims to gun violence as long as white male christians could go pew, pew, pew to the hearts content."

(These words are bn2f's and at no time are to be taken or construed to be those of the member known as RoryN though they are accurate and DO wholly represent the words that member RoryN would have said.)
 
Back
Top