Make Them ANSWER.................dont stop asking

Should've known this was going to come down to the Great Replacement Theory. Doesn't everything?

I'm not into any grand conspiracies but I do believe in unintended consequences. Abortion as a tool of eliminating undesirables was part of the eugenics strategy and Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was a devout eugenicist.

Her ideas about sterilizing undesirables were implemented in the 1930's and into the 1960's with no end of men and women being sterilized against their will and without even a court order.

The right-wing conspiracy nuts at PBS did a show on this.

https://www.pbs.org/independentlens...n-and-eugenics-programs-in-the-united-states/
 
Last edited:
I'm not into any grand conspiracies but I do believe in unintended consequences. Abortion as a tool of eliminating undesirables was part of the eugenics strategy and Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was a devout eugenicist.

Her ideas about sterilizing undesirables was implemented in the 1930's and into the 1960's with no end of men and women being sterilized against their will and without even a court order.

The right-wing conspiracy nuts at PBS did a show on this.

https://www.pbs.org/independentlens...n-and-eugenics-programs-in-the-united-states/

But, somehow, the Left has brainwashed millions of women into thinking this is a good thing.
 
But, somehow, the Left has brainwashed millions of women into thinking this is a good thing.

They started with the Virgina Slims ad campaigns.


This set the agenda for the anti-family abortion movement that promoted the notion that pregnancy was a disease that needed to be cured. With an abortion.

The double-plus-good thing here was that the women who wanted abortions were also killing themselves with fashionable cigarettes.
 
I'm not into any grand conspiracies but I do believe in unintended consequences. Abortion as a tool of eliminating undesirables was part of the eugenics strategy and Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was a devout eugenicist.
Wrong, and her own writings prove as much (if you read the whole thing, not just that list of out-of-context quotes I'm sure you've got bookmarked somewhere).
Her ideas about sterilizing undesirables were implemented in the 1930's and into the 1960's with no end of men and women being sterilized against their will and without even a court order.
Sanger had nothing to do with that.
Rightguide syndrome again. Your link doesn't say anything remotely like you're implying here.
 
I had such high hopes for you, and now you do something like this. You're talking nonsense again that you can't back up.
So, once again: you look at the facts, for example about the election. You realise that it was largely above board, except for the attempted electoral fraud by the incumbent at the time.
So the theory could be...
Donald Trump is a liar and a cheat who is morally unfit to hold public office.
But now to the point.
A right-wing extremist nutcase is shot dead. His alleged murderer is a right-wing extremist nutcase.
You demand that people distance themselves from this. Of course, you are right to make this demand. In a constitutional state, murder, regardless of who it is and who commits it, can never be acceptable.
So let's take a look at the reactions.
Democrats: condemn the act and trust in the administration of justice.
Republicans: claim without evidence that the perpetrator is one of their political opponents and try to capitalise on this politically.
I believe the thesis that Republicans are morally incapable of being part of the legislature and therefore completely fail in this role is justified.

See? That's how it is done.
^^^
Full of crap full time.
 
Yes, i am.
Wait... Just a second....
And out it is.
In opposition to you, I can relief mine easily on the toilet.
Yours is in the brain, though.

Just so you know, the individual you are engaging with has earned the nickname “scat-man” here on the PB, and they get off on these kinds of exchanges.

😳
 
Just so you know, the individual you are engaging with has earned the nickname “scat-man” here on the PB, and they get off on these kinds of exchanges.

😳
Given the choice I prefer Scatman John.
😜
But yes, I know. He has no life, no friends, no future, still waiting for a woman to end his misery, as in: taking his virginity.
He has nothing to be proud of. All his 'success' is posting in here and trying to drag others into his miserable mindset.
He never achieved something of worth. So he tries to go for acceptance for his bile from others in similar situation.
I admit I feel a little bit sorry.
However, he still is a wanker.
 
WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES
 
WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES
Stop that.
You sound like a MAGA.
 
Last edited:
Not me. Myself, I think it's a shame that no one thought to bar a Tim Walz appointee from owning firearms. Mark Dayton, another Democrat, had also appointed Vance Boelter to a post. Boelter was registered to vote in Minnesota but had not stated a party preference. Before moving to Minnesota Boelter had been a Republican but for whatever reason was disaffected by the GOP.

Supporters of gun control in Minnesota should henceforth demand that anyone who works for self-proclaimed "knucklehead" Tim Walz should be deeply vetted and screened before being allowed anywhere near a firearm.
So you support having psychological assessments of gun owners. That is something that I've been calling for, for years. I'll add your name to the petition. (y)
 
So you support having psychological assessments of gun owners. That is something that I've been calling for, for years. I'll add your name to the petition. (y)

Yup. But my caveat is that the screening can only be conducted by people who have first met the screening criteria.
 
So you support having psychological assessments of gun owners. That is something that I've been calling for, for years. I'll add your name to the petition. (y)
No LIBZ, or TRANZ or DUMZ or anyone that ever voted D or even has a D in their name should have a GUN
 
Yup. But my caveat is that the screening can only be conducted by people who have first met the screening criteria.
Absolutely. Have sane doctors examine every applicant for a firearm and certify that they can be trusted to use it safely.
 
Just in case anyone is trying to avoid the subject (US “media” I’m looking at you), have we found out what animal the Furry was that young Tyler was buggering? The media just doesn’t seem interested. I can understand our resident rodent furries on this forum, but boy, our “news” agencies just aren’t up to the task.

Guess there is a double standard for Tranny’s and “Furries”…
 
Just in case anyone is trying to avoid the subject (US “media” I’m looking at you), have we found out what animal the Furry was that young Tyler was buggering? The media just doesn’t seem interested. I can understand our resident rodent furries on this forum, but boy, our “news” agencies just aren’t up to the task.

Guess there is a double standard for Tranny’s and “Furries”…
Why is this important to you?
 
But, somehow, the Left has brainwashed millions of women into thinking this is a good thing.
Claiming “the Left brainwashed millions of women” strips women of their own agency. Women are capable of weighing their circumstances, values, and futures without political puppeteering. Abortion access isn’t about brainwashing—it’s about choice. If anything, the real brainwashing was the decades-long right-wing campaign to overturn Roe v. Wade, which culminated in Dobbs and actually removed women’s ability to choose in much of the country. The irony is plain: the Left trusted women to decide for themselves—the Right made sure they couldn’t.

Your views regarding women's place in society are about in line with Charlie Kirk's views: women should be seen but not heard. Didn't you also call for the removal of women's right to vote?
 
Just in case anyone is trying to avoid the subject (US “media” I’m looking at you), have we found out what animal the Furry was that young Tyler was buggering? The media just doesn’t seem interested. I can understand our resident rodent furries on this forum, but boy, our “news” agencies just aren’t up to the task.

Guess there is a double standard for Tranny’s and “Furries”…
Would knowing that help you to cope with Kirk's death? You would have to follow tabloids for that detail. Most reputable news sources know that question is not relevant to Kirk's death, don't they?
 
Given the choice I prefer Scatman John.
😜
But yes, I know. He has no life, no friends, no future, still waiting for a woman to end his misery, as in: taking his virginity.
He has nothing to be proud of. All his 'success' is posting in here and trying to drag others into his miserable mindset.
He never achieved something of worth. So he tries to go for acceptance for his bile from others in similar situation.
I admit I feel a little bit sorry.
However, he still is a wanker.
Me thinks it's time a service technician puts your fat ass on the lift for your million word check-up.
 
Back
Top