Jimmy "The asshole" Kimmel tossed off thd air.

I could waste a whole boat load of time and energy pointing out the legal challenges to your ChatGPT nonsense and follow it up with twice as many legitimate legal challenges against the Biden administration for coercing media platforms forcing shutdown of differing medical opinions on covid vaccines, media suppression, election interference on so many levels, libel, lying to the American people, hateful speech, Biden's democrat majority FCC approval to give Soros a majority equity stake in more than 200 Audacy radio stations.

Cry me a river. Democrats have used every underhanded, unethical tactic trick in the book, legal and illegal. Pretty sad when Democrat DAs, AGs are corrupt to the core. I find it ironic that titia James while allegedly committing similar mortgage fraud crimes was charging Trump for much lesser crimes and pushing for ridiculous fines.

If anyone needs a shot of self awareness it's YOU!!!
The way you make up bullshit to defend your team's bullshit is quite the feat.
 
It was a learning experience but you don't believe in getevenism.
So you actually do like that behavior now and so the people who did it before weren't engaging in bad behavior and you were wrong.

Got it. 👍
 
So you actually do like that behavior now and so the people who did it before weren't engaging in bad behavior and you were wrong.

Got it. 👍
Is there a name for that technique you use to flip what someone says and proclaim it as truth? :)
 
Is there a name for that technique you use to flip what someone says and proclaim it as truth?


1. You believe that behavior by the left in the past was wrong.
2. You believe that the same behavior by the right currently is right.

Are the above two things correct?
Is the behavior right or wrong?

Ive interpreted your past statements to be yes on the first and right on the second. Please let me know how I'm wrong. Or tell me how the second question doesn't diminish your position.
 
It's fascinating how the MAGAt 🤡s make up things about Dems and then get mad at Dems about the thing they just made up.
 
1. You believe that behavior by the left in the past was wrong.
2. You believe that the same behavior by the right currently is right.

Are the above two things correct?
Is the behavior right or wrong?

Ive interpreted your past statements to be yes on the first and right on the second. Please let me know how I'm wrong. Or tell me how the second question doesn't diminish your position.
I think your being hurt and surprised that the Republicans are using the same techniques the Democrats have been doing for decades, only better, makes you a whiny bitch. :)
 
Nice try blaming it on low ratings. Kimmel was the number two show in that time slot.
His ratings only slipped 2.3 %. He still had millions of viewers.
Nothing he said was offensive. Trump and his magas just can't handle either the truth or a joke !
If you want to talk about what he said, it was not a joke nor was it presented as a joke.
Which is why Nexstar initially let Disney know what Kimmel did was not representative of viewers. As result the advertisers were backing out.
 
If you want to talk about what he said, it was not a joke nor was it presented as a joke.
Which is why Nexstar initially let Disney know what Kimmel did was not representative of viewers. As result the advertisers were backing out.

Sure, if you say it enough your fellow maggots will believe it, but the rest of us? No.
 
You're seemingly okay with the FCC chair saying that if the companies didn't can him for belittling the president, then the FCC would have to step in and take action? This is from the man who said other shows would be targeted as well. This is a governmental-level threat of censorship. You haven't a clue about the context for Trump's hurt feelings being acted upon by an underling abusing his control over corporations seeking to expand their businesses. It is NOT about business; it is about stifling speech that Trump is unhappy with. Narcissistic behavior with targeted retribution, exactly as Trump said he was.
Belittling the president? Did you even hear what the asshole said that got all this attention?
 
Ultimately the question for MAGA supporters is whether or not the constitution, more specifically the Bill of Rights, is still the sacred law of the US?

If the 2nd Amendment should be taken in the most flexible form possible, why should the same application of the law not apply to the other other amendments?

And Libel and Slander are also addressed in the first amendment.

But you cannot legally directly or indirectly influence target individuals or organizations for criticism of their speech. The most recent decision, which was decided by the current Supreme Court, was decided 9-0 in favor of the NRA for this exact purpose
Libel and slander are not addressed in the first amendment.
The government cannot legally silence individuals or organizations for criticism of their speech.
"You" can do whatever you want. However, when you do it representative of another, Disney in this event, you are susceptible to their rules and beliefs.
Kimmel not the government have a case of any kind in this matter.
 
If you want to talk about what he said, it was not a joke nor was it presented as a joke.
Which is why Nexstar initially let Disney know what Kimmel did was not representative of viewers. As result the advertisers were backing out.
Not just advertising, but also, smaller local networks didn't want to buy into what Jimmy-boy was selling. Couple that with ratings and viewership dropping like grass through cow's digestive system, a hasbeen wantabe ideological unfunny comic and what you have is a business decision to cut bait.
 
Libel and slander are not addressed in the first amendment.
The government cannot legally silence individuals or organizations for criticism of their speech.
"You" can do whatever you want. However, when you do it representative of another, Disney in this event, you are susceptible to their rules and beliefs.
Kimmel not the government have a case of any kind in this matter.
And Disney is susceptible to mine.
 
I think your being hurt and surprised that the Republicans are using the same techniques the Democrats have been doing for decades, only better, makes you a whiny bitch.
So you won't answer simple questions.

Got it.
 
First you assholes came here claiming that he made a bad joke, then he violated ABC policies, and now you’re pushing that advertisers were behind his suspension. Next, we will hear that Kimmel wasn’t really the intended target, but his employment of Guillermo was. 🙄
First, we are not the assholes. Second, none of us are claiming he made a joke at all, which is what has him in hot water. Third, I do not know what ABC's policies are, what I do know is Nexstar, the broadcaster, stated directly that his comments were not representative of viewers. Forth, I and others suspect advertisers were pulling their ad revenue, likely the FCC comment "...the hard way".
Who is Guillermo?
 
Like I've said many times before, PB Deplorables are poor. They think this is a lot of money. 😘

Liberals are disgusting when they think $8,000 is a mere pittance.

For about 1/3 of the people in the world this represents more than what they earn in a year.
 
Back
Top