Elleelle74 is concerned the Kirk assination could become a tipping point

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Just look at what Charlie Kirk said about gun deaths being the (acceptable, to him) price you have to pay for your Second Amendment.

Both can certainly be true. Democrats want to take away guns. Trump wants to put away killers, a distinct but essential difference.

Don't be silly. Trump is happy with criminals, like his friend and partner in pedo Jeffrey Epstein. Not to mention all the January 6 people he pardoned because he approved of their crimes.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Don't be silly. Trump is happy with criminals, like his friend and partner in pedo Jeffrey Epstein. Not to mention all the January 6 people he pardoned because he approved of their crimes.

I'm not saying there isn't a political component to Trump going into sanctuary cities. Democrats like Pritzker, Newsom & Johnson haven't done a goddamned thing about violence in their cities.

 

[Lazaran]

Don't be silly. Trump is happy with criminals, like his friend and partner in pedo Jeffrey Epstein. Not to mention all the January 6 people he pardoned because he approved of their crimes.

Trump is not only “happy” with criminals, Trump is “happy” with mass murdering criminals (See: Vladimir Putin).



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Don't be silly. Trump is happy with criminals, like his friend and partner in pedo Jeffrey Epstein. Not to mention all the January 6 people he pardoned because he approved of their crimes.

I'm not saying there isn't a political component to Trump going into sanctuary cities. Democrats like Pritzker, Newsom & Johnson haven't done a goddamned thing about violence in their cities.

Places like Chicago and Washington, DC are seeing their lowest crime rates in decades. If Trump were really concerned about crime (which he isn't, unless it's pardoning people who commit crimes) he'd contribute, say, money for paying police (he engineered the withholding of money DC was due for their police force, remember?) or for more housing or social services. Instead he's cosplaying with the National Guard, wasting a tremendous amount of your tax dollars on people wandering around in camo who aren't law enforcement and can do nothing but call for the real police when something bad happens.

 

[jhenry922]

Tipping point?

Sandy Hook WASN'T a tipping point. Columbine wasn't either. Charlie Kirks death was the predictable outcome of an individual espousing violent solution to common problems of society.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Don't be silly. Trump is happy with criminals, like his friend and partner in pedo Jeffrey Epstein. Not to mention all the January 6 people he pardoned because he approved of their crimes.

I'm not saying there isn't a political component to Trump going into sanctuary cities. Democrats like Pritzker, Newsom & Johnson haven't done a goddamned thing about violence in their cities.

Places like Chicago and Washington, DC are seeing their lowest crime rates in decades. If Trump were really concerned about crime (which he isn't, unless it's pardoning people who commit crimes) he'd contribute, say, money for paying police (he engineered the withholding of money DC was due for their police force, remember?) or for more housing or social services. Instead he's cosplaying with the National Guard, wasting a tremendous amount of your tax dollars on people wandering around in camo who aren't law enforcement and can do nothing but call for the real police when something bad happens.

Once again, incorrect. Their corrupt leaders have been cooking the numbers for decades.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Tipping point?

Sandy Hook WASN'T a tipping point. Columbine wasn't either. Charlie Kirks death was the predictable outcome of an individual espousing violent solution to common problems of society.

Obviously not. What has been done that makes any difference since? Does that make AOC a valid target? Rev. Wright? Whoopi?

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Places like Chicago and Washington, DC are seeing their lowest crime rates in decades. If Trump were really concerned about crime (which he isn't, unless it's pardoning people who commit crimes) he'd contribute, say, money for paying police (he engineered the withholding of money DC was due for their police force, remember?) or for more housing or social services. Instead he's cosplaying with the National Guard, wasting a tremendous amount of your tax dollars on people wandering around in camo who aren't law enforcement and can do nothing but call for the real police when something bad happens.

Once again, incorrect. Their corrupt leaders have been cooking the numbers for decades.

That's silly. Risible, in fact.

You don't like the real numbers, you claim they're fake, then you attack the people who gave you the numbers, like your President firing the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics for saying your emperor has no clothes.

 

[Saint_Ann]

That's silly. Risible, in fact.

You don't like the real numbers, you claim they're fake, then you attack the people who gave you the numbers, like your President firing the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics for saying your emperor has no clothes.

Do politocos EVER say crime is increasing? Lol.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
That's silly. Risible, in fact.

You don't like the real numbers, you claim they're fake, then you attack the people who gave you the numbers, like your President firing the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics for saying your emperor has no clothes.

Do politocos EVER say crime is increasing? Lol.

Donald Trump was saying (lying) a lot about crime as an excuse to send the militia (who are not law enforcement officers, of course) into Washington DC.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Donald Trump was saying (lying) a lot about crime as an excuse to send the militia (who are not law enforcement officers, of course) into Washington DC.

Is it working?

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Hay now, I know a guy who would differ with this...

Was he just shot in the neck?