Instead of bashing Trump...

[Bn2f]

Then you should LOVE the Big Beautiful Bill because it increases the child tax credit to $2500 for the next 3 years then makes it permanent at $2000.

Say; Thank You Mr. President.

Thank you Mr. President. But let's wait until the final bill passes to send you a stampled thank you letter. Meanwhile...

Just seeing this post and wanted to add that even with the House adding another 500 bucks raising this to 2500, Kamala Harris’s child tax credit was a proposed 6k - more than double. But of course HisA would crow about savings after buying a bottle of coke for a dollar and then getting .10 cents back for recycling the cap.

Harris plans to extend the child tax credit to $6,000 for newborns, $3,600 for children ages one to five and $3,000 for children five and older. No income threshold has been specified in her plan for the CTC.

https://www.cbh.com/insights/articles/child-tax-credit-expansion-trump-vs-harris-proposals/

 

[Bn2f]

View attachment 2544527

 

[HisArpy]

Just seeing this post and wanted to add that even with the House adding another 500 bucks raising this to 2500, Kamala Harris’s child tax credit was a proposed 6k - more than double. But of course HisA would crow about savings after buying a bottle of coke for a dollar and then getting .10 cents back for recycling the cap.

Harris plans to extend the child tax credit to $6,000 for newborns, $3,600 for children ages one to five and $3,000 for children five and older. No income threshold has been specified in her plan for the CTC.

https://www.cbh.com/insights/articles/child-tax-credit-expansion-trump-vs-harris-proposals/

And yet Harris' plan didn't make it through Congress.

Which SHOULD, and normally would, tell anyone not steeped in TDS that the majority didn't think it was reasonable or appropriate.

But you go ahead and use that which never came to fruition as a basis to deny that which became reality.

 

[Bn2f]

And yet Harris' plan didn't make it through Congress.

Which SHOULD, and normally would, tell anyone not steeped in TDS that the majority didn't think it was reasonable or appropriate.

But you go ahead and use that which never came to fruition as a basis to deny that which became reality.

Well, first, you’re a dipshit. Let’s just get that out the way. Second, you’re a stupid dipshit. The CTC proposal from trump was 2k. Harris proposed 6k. There’s no comparison between the two as they were campaigned. It’s to the American public’s disadvantage for not being able to distinguish the obvious math differences between the two AND also a shout out to the D’s for not effectively educating. Third, and this is my most important point because it allows me to delight ONCE AGAIN in the practice that brings me no greater joy when engaging with your stupid, dipshit of a lying ass supposed lawyer who somehow manages to continually lose arguments to a person with a diploma mastering in high school P.E. - You’re accusing me of “using that which never came to fruition as a basis to deny that which became reality.” Wrong. Liar. I did no such thing. That is, in fact, what YOU are attempting to do. The fact that Harris lost does not negate that her plan offered 3x the CTC than trump’s. And, for icing on your dipshit, disingenuous way of arguing - since you want to throw out the fact that proposed bills get amended as they make their way through congress, by your own standard of measuring Harris’s CTC, trump’s failed as well. It, in fact, did not make it through congress.

 

[HisArpy]

Well, first, you’re a dipshit. Let’s just get that out the way. Second, you’re a stupid dipshit. The CTC proposal from trump was 2k. Harris proposed 6k. There’s no comparison between the two as they were campaigned. It’s to the American public’s disadvantage for not being able to distinguish the obvious math differences between the two AND also a shout out to the D’s for not effectively educating. Third, and this is my most important point because it allows me to delight ONCE AGAIN in the practice that brings me no greater joy when engaging with your stupid, dipshit of a lying ass supposed lawyer who somehow manages to continually lose arguments to a person with a diploma mastering in high school P.E. - You’re accusing me of “using that which never came to fruition as a basis to deny that which became reality.” Wrong. Liar. I did no such thing. That is, in fact, what YOU are attempting to do. The fact that Harris lost does not negate that her plan offered 3x the CTC than trump’s. And, for icing on your dipshit, disingenuous way of arguing - since you want to throw out the fact that proposed bills get amended as they make their way through congress, by your own standard of measuring Harris’s CTC, trump’s failed as well. It, in fact, did not make it through congress.

And yet CONGRESS deemed that the Harris proposal wasn't the way to go.

What happened to "Muy Democracy" and "majority rule?" Aren't you one of the ones who are big on doing what the majority decides?

Well, dudly, the MAJORITY decided that 6k wasn't appropriate. Just like THE MAJORITY decided that Harris wasn't someone they wanted to be President.

Ad I'm good with Congress thinking that Trump's 2k needed to be increased. I see that as a win instead of a loss. Which is something you can't say for anything Kamala Harris.

Overall, for someone who thinks they're intelligent, you're remarkably fucking stupid and ignorant and a whiner and a sore loser. You'd do better to just STFU for the next 3 years.

 

[Bn2f]

And yet CONGRESS deemed that the Harris proposal wasn't the way to go.

What happened to "Muy Democracy" and "majority rule?" Aren't you one of the ones who are big on doing what the majority decides?

Well, dudly, the MAJORITY decided that 6k wasn't appropriate. Just like THE MAJORITY decided that Harris wasn't someone they wanted to be President.

Ad I'm good with Congress thinking that Trump's 2k needed to be increased. I see that as a win instead of a loss. Which is something you can't say for anything Kamala Harris.

Overall, for someone who thinks they're intelligent, you're remarkably fucking stupid and ignorant and a whiner and a sore loser. You'd do better to just STFU for the next 3 years.

But of course, you come back with a double down on the stupid.

Maff me how 2k is a better tax credit for ANYTHING over a credit of 6?

 

[HisArpy]

It's called democracy you fuckwit.

You know, that thing you tout as being The One True Way even as you rage that our government is doing exactly that.

Your problem isn't the 6k. It's not even that Harris lost. YOUR PROBLEM is that Trump won and you just cannot accept that. Instead you fabricate a reason to diss on him and the rest of society which didn't, and still doesn't, believe that crime, corruption, and chaos is "better."

You vision isn't visionary, it's a nightmare that only the insane would support. Which seems to apply to you given your support for all the other exceeding stupid and insane ideas your political ideology has created.

 

[Bn2f]

It's called democracy you fuckwit.

You know, that thing you tout as being The One True Way even as you rage that our government is doing exactly that.

Your problem isn't the 6k. It's not even that Harris lost. YOUR PROBLEM is that Trump won and you just cannot accept that. Instead you fabricate a reason to diss on him and the rest of society which didn't, and still doesn't, believe that crime, corruption, and chaos is "better."

You vision isn't visionary, it's a nightmare that only the insane would support. Which seems to apply to you given your support for all the other exceeding stupid and insane ideas your political ideology has created.

None of this is what I have argued. You’re dumb as shit and people see it.

I’ll ask again: In what real world context is a credit for 2k better for a budgeting family than a credit of 6?

Read and try your best with your limited intellect to comprehend. Well, to be fair, if we taxed stupid - you would have an argument for taking the 2. But would you be intelligent enough to know that?

 

[HisArpy]

None of this is what I have argued. You’re dumb as shit and people see it.

I’ll ask again: In what real world context is a credit for 2k better for a budgeting family than a credit of 6?

Read and try your best with your limited intellect to comprehend. Well, to be fair, if we taxed stupid - you would have an argument for taking the 2. But would you be intelligent enough to know that?

Insisting on repeating your stupid commentary without understanding the basic premise in it is where you go wrong.

DEMOCRACY prevailed. It's not about which is "better" it's about how the system works. Something which you've been big on saying but when faced with an outcome you don't like you now suddenly don't support.

You're a lying farce.

 

[Bn2f]

Insisting on repeating your stupid commentary without understanding the basic premise in it is where you go wrong.

DEMOCRACY prevailed. It's not about which is "better" it's about how the system works. Something which you've been big on saying but when faced with an outcome you don't like you now suddenly don't support.

You're a lying farce.

Haha!
Look how far you want to get away from talking about the CTC. Look how you’re throwing out every TDS deflection to not answer a basic math question.
Fuck off. You fuckin tool.

I. OWN. YOU.

 

[HisArpy]

Haha!
Look how far you want to get away from talking about the CTC. Look how you’re throwing out every TDS deflection to not answer a basic math question.
Fuck off. You fuckin tool.

I. OWN. YOU.

Lol, you little socialist, you OWN nothing, not even your opinions.

And you can go on prattling about how Trump's CTC is smaller than the LOSER's attempt at raising the CTC all you want; Congress didn't agree with her OR YOU.

Which puts you on the wrong side of this debate.

Plus: Luv me that democracy in action.

 

[Lazaran]

Lol, you little socialist, you OWN nothing, not even your opinions.

And you can go on prattling about how Trump's CTC is smaller than the LOSER's attempt at raising the CTC all you want; Congress didn't agree with her OR YOU.

Which puts you on the wrong side of this debate.

Plus: Luv me that democracy in action.

Once again Derpy loses the plot (misses the point?) AND the argument, but Derpy STILL declares "victory"…



Derpy



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[Bn2f]

Lol, you little socialist, you OWN nothing, not even your opinions.

Once again Derpy loses the plot (misses the point?) AND the argument, but Derpy STILL declares "victory"…



Derpy



We. Told. Them. So.

He lost on the gun squabble as well. Fucker lives his life, in California no less, in constant fear of the some made up lib boogeyman coming to take his tiny penis pew pew away.

 

[HisArpy]

Once again Derpy loses the plot (misses the point?) AND the argument, but Derpy STILL declares "victory"…



Derpy



We. Told. Them. So.

He lost on the gun squabble as well. Fucker lives his life, in California no less, in constant fear of the some made up lib boogeyman coming to take his tiny penis pew pew away.

Yeah, sorry but your personal beliefs don't mirror reality.

 

[RedDevilCock]

I love how they didn't demand gun control after Trump was shot!

 

[Lazaran]

I love how they didn't demand gun control after Trump was shot!

Decent, intelligent individuals pointed out at the time that the shooter was a REGISTERED REPUBLICAN & AN AMMOSEXUAL INCEL - while the MAGAts pointed to a fifteen dollar donation the REGISTERED REPUBLICAN AMMOSEXUAL INCEL made to ActBlue years earlier when the shooter was a kid.

Decent, intelligent individuals also pointed out that the gun used was an AR style rifle, while the MAGAts tried to claim it was a single shot bolt action rifle.

Decent, intelligent individuals tried to make the case for gun control after that event (and maaaaaany others).

You lose.



GTFOH
FOAD
TIA


We. Told. Them. So.