Story rejected for AI - any suggestions

[wordbeast]

I recently had a 2nd part of a story rejected.(right under his nose pt 2). I believe the moderator is claiming it’s an AI story. It definitely is NOT an ai story. I spent a lot of time trying to proofread this submission because the first part of this story was rejected 5 times for grammatical errors.

I’m a new author here, and have successfully submitted four parts to a different series (Fashion Show 1-4). Have the rules to posting stories all of a sudden gotten more stringent on Literotica? Because going back over my first series, I myself can find multiple embarrassing grammatical errors in that series, yet it was posted with no issues.

So, I’m confused as how this moderator has determined that my story was generated by ai. And at this point what should I do? Any suggestions?

 

[ShelbyDawn57]

There have to be a dozen threads about this. Start by searching for them and reviewing the discussions

 

[NotWise]

I recently had a 2nd part of a story rejected.(right under his nose pt 2). I believe the moderator is claiming it’s an AI story. It definitely is NOT an ai story. I spent a lot of time trying to proofread this submission because the first part of this story was rejected 5 times for grammatical errors.

I’m a new author here, and have successfully submitted four parts to a different series (Fashion Show 1-4). Have the rules to posting stories all of a sudden gotten more stringent on Literotica? Because going back over my first series, I myself can find multiple embarrassing grammatical errors in that series, yet it was posted with no issues.

So, I’m confused as how this moderator has determined that my story was generated by ai. And at this point what should I do? Any suggestions?

There's nothing much we can do for you here. Please refer to AwkwardMDs AI Help Desk thread in the editor's forum.

 

[kokomoe1]

I'm not kidding when I say this, but add some typos and small grammatical errors to your story to help get past the AI check. This website seems to think writing in perfect grammar means it's AI, so adding a couple errors here and there will help them think it wasn't written by AI.

 

[SimonDoom]

I do NOT recommend deliberately adding grammatical mistake, because that makes your story worse, but you might consider going through your draft and changing things here and there to make the narrative voice or dialogue seem more human. Use contractions, for example. Make sure your characters talk like real people. Sending a note to Laurel with your next submission politely but firmly stating your case. Laurel is the only content moderator.

 

[FrancesScott]

@Laurel (the site co-owner and only, as far as we know, reviewer of stories) told me that the only thing that can help with rejected stories is reading the following. Sorry if that sounds blunt, it was in posted in response to me approaching her about AI work specifically. Good luck!

https://forum.literotica.com/threads/story-sent-back-please-read.1637742/

 

[OddLove]

I'm not kidding when I say this, but add some typos and small grammatical errors to your story to help get past the AI check. This website seems to think writing in perfect grammar means it's AI, so adding a couple errors here and there will help them think it wasn't written by AI.

That actually makes a lot of sense to me.

EDIT: Without full transparency on how the AI flagging system works, it could be worth a shot.

 

[iwatchus]

That actually makes a lot of sense to me.

EDIT: Without full transparency on how the AI flagging system works, it could be worth a shot.

DISCLAIMER: I have no idea what they use for a checker. My expectation is that it is a combination of an automated checker or checkers and a human review.

As a college professor, I think I have gotten pretty good at spotting AI generated essays. There is just an awkward structuring to them. I worry that we may occaionally flag ESL students unfairly, because they can display some of the same awkwardness (and have since before the availability of generative AI).

I do not think I could articulate clearly what that awkwardness is, but it is absolutely not a lack of typos or grammatical errors. That is a common mythos about AI generated vs human written text.

Because of the traditional cat and mouse games between cheaters and checkers, this sort of a situation is exactly why there cannot be complete transparency about how they check. If that is a bug, it is a bug in a much larger sense than just this site.

 

[kokomoe1]

DISCLAIMER: I have no idea what they use for a checker. My expectation is that it is a combination of an automated checker or checkers and a human review.

As a college professor, I think I have gotten pretty good at spotting AI generated essays. There is just an awkward structuring to them. I worry that we may occaionally flag ESL students unfairly, because they can display some of the same awkwardness (and have since before the availability of generative AI).

I do not think I could articulate clearly what that awkwardness is, but it is absolutely not a lack of typos or grammatical errors. That is a common mythos about AI generated vs human written text.

Because of the traditional cat and mouse games between cheaters and checkers, this sort of a situation is exactly why there cannot be complete transparency about how they check. If that is a bug, it is a bug in a much larger sense than just this site.

So they use AI to check if what you wrote was written by AI. Isn't the future amazing?

 

[AwkwardMD]

So they use AI to check if what you wrote was written by AI. Isn't the future amazing?

That is not what iwatchus said.

 

[NotWise]

So they use AI to check if what you wrote was written by AI. Isn't the future amazing?

If one AI decides that text is created by another AI, then you can get a third AI to make it more human.

 

[AwkwardMD]

If one AI decides that text is created by another AI, then you can get a third AI to make it more human.

When it comes to AI onky a triple negative can swing things around