DevlinSkye
Virgin
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2025
- Posts
- 1
I have read some of the posts and I am clear that I can't continue the abandoned story without Authors Explicit Permission. (While the author confirmed that they have left Lit for good, they never responded to request to continue theire stories.) Which leads to the next question how do I make it my own.
Now, without getting in to specific and start pointed debate, I want to get general understanding on where is the limit for taking inspiration?
I have seen some stories which only change the character names and basically paraphrase the same story with minor changes of their own. They there are some who keep the same skeletion/plot of the story and write their own stuff (but still its the same story). Then there are some who write their own but its obivious for a reader that they are reading the same old story told in diffrent perspective.
Now, I understand that either of these method will get me bypass the rule. Also, some of such stories are really good as well (Not that I claim I could write better that the original author.) But no matter how you look at it, its a dick move as lovecraft called in of the responses.
Now some would say write your own but the end goal is to resolve the nagging feeling that the incomplete story had left in me. So obiviously I want to continue on the same path of previous story. I am not talking about writing a complete diffrent thing. If I do that, there is no reason for this post.
The ideal sitution would have been for author to give theire blessings for rewrite but they chose to ignore my emails. So, I have to take the alternate route to write my own thing.
My ask here is, genuinely where you draw the line for creative inspiration?
Now, without getting in to specific and start pointed debate, I want to get general understanding on where is the limit for taking inspiration?
I have seen some stories which only change the character names and basically paraphrase the same story with minor changes of their own. They there are some who keep the same skeletion/plot of the story and write their own stuff (but still its the same story). Then there are some who write their own but its obivious for a reader that they are reading the same old story told in diffrent perspective.
Now, I understand that either of these method will get me bypass the rule. Also, some of such stories are really good as well (Not that I claim I could write better that the original author.) But no matter how you look at it, its a dick move as lovecraft called in of the responses.
Now some would say write your own but the end goal is to resolve the nagging feeling that the incomplete story had left in me. So obiviously I want to continue on the same path of previous story. I am not talking about writing a complete diffrent thing. If I do that, there is no reason for this post.
The ideal sitution would have been for author to give theire blessings for rewrite but they chose to ignore my emails. So, I have to take the alternate route to write my own thing.
My ask here is, genuinely where you draw the line for creative inspiration?