Cock Talk

My browser history seems to tell on me (I've been watching a LOT of threesomes lately)
And…

I bet you’re getting a lot of ads for condoms, lube and std tests?

For example, I was looking at the unhide blankets, and now every pop up ad is for unhide blankets.
 
My browser history seems to tell on me (I've been watching a LOT of threesomes lately)
And what combination of threesomes has grabbed your attention most? 🧐
For example, I was looking at the unhide blankets, and now every pop up ad is for unhide blankets.
What is an unhide blanket? Is it a blanket with a hole in it so you can stay warm while watching movies with your dick?
 
In a hypothetical threesome, do you prefer to be the couple who invites a third person in, would you rather be the third person, or would you prefer three non-romantic people who just need a good fuck?
**This is very hypothetical, because I would never participate in a threesome**
I'd prefer the 3rd option: non-romantic, but familiar with one another.
Do you want all the attention on you, or do you want the other two to spend some time on each other while you watch?
Neither; everyone should be getting some type of attention. We have two hands and a couple of holes for a reason.
Would you prefer to be in your bed, their bed, or a neutral area?
Neutral.
On your way out through the threeway gift shop, do you want to buy the photo of your climax, or are you good with just the memory?
Memory is fine; I don't need physical evidence.
Is a threeway daisy chain the best approach to everyone getting the proper attention, or is it better to let one person be ravaged by the other two and just take turns?
Go with the flow.
Rate these in the order you would be interested in doing them: FFM, MMF, MFM, FMF, MMM, FFF (when the letters are next to each other it means those two will/can fuck, otherwise there are pre-established rules)
Most to least:
- MFM
- MMF
- FMF
- FFM
- FFF
- MMM (physically impossible)
 
Three is the loneliest number.

In a hypothetical threesome, do you prefer to be the couple who invites a third person in, would you rather be the third person, or would you prefer three non-romantic people who just need a good fuck?
To be the couple who invites the third
Do you want all the attention on you, or do you want the other two to spend some time on each other while you watch?
Attention should be equally spread across all three
Would you prefer to be in your bed, their bed, or a neutral area?
Our bed would do
On your way out through the threeway gift shop, do you want to buy the photo of your climax, or are you good with just the memory?
Why not video recording?
Is a threeway daisy chain the best approach to everyone getting the proper attention, or is it better to let one person be ravaged by the other two and just take turns?
It depends on the situation... I love the daisy chain...
Rate these in the order you would be interested in doing them: FFM, MMF, MFM, FMF, MMM, FFF (when the letters are next to each other it means those two will/can fuck, otherwise there are pre-established rules)
FFM, FMF, MFF
 
Three is the loneliest number.

In a hypothetical threesome, do you prefer to be the couple who invites a third person in, would you rather be the third person, or would you prefer three non-romantic people who just need a good fuck?
A long time ago, on another website far, far away, a much younger and more naïf Mei5ter was propositioned to be part of an online threesome. It was an interesting experience, even online rather than in-person. Details are slightly changed to protect the less -than-totally innocent.

This couple had a fantasy, which appears to be a fairly common one, where the man watches his partner being fucked by another, better-endowed man - in this case me. Why me? Well, this was an ampics site, and I was new and enthusiastic. I had pictures in my gallery, and apparently they had noticed these and decided I was a good fit for the part, so to speak. Now, threesomes aren't particularly my thing, but this seemed a chance to try an online version of something I'd never otherwise experience, so to cut a long story short I said yes.

The main things I took from that experience were that:
- threesomes aren't just emotionally complicated, but involve serious logistics
- threesomes described by text on a clunky IM system feel like the weirdest Zoom meeting ever
- couples who fantasise about 'a third' don't always have a clear idea of what that third will actually do
- bathos is a thing on a sex site

In this case, it became very clear that this couple hadn't given nuch thought to what comes after the fuck-me-while-he-watches part. In their fantasy, I think the third person just discreetly vanished while they focused on each other for the rest of the night. At the start of things, I was obviously pretty directly involved, and they were clearly both enjoying it. That was hot for me too. But once that part was over, my role in this scene abruptly ended. My job was done, and I had no place there any more.

So I think I just quietly left. Can't quite remember. Like I said, bathos.

I'm glad I tried it. And I'm sure people can and will point out this was 'only' online. But yes, three was indeed the loneliest number that evening.

So my approach to the idea of a threesome nowadays is more...

Rate these in the order you would be interested in doing them: FFM, MMF, MFM, FMF, MMM, FFF (when the letters are next to each other it means those two will/can fuck, otherwise there are pre-established rules)
FML.
 
In a hypothetical threesome, do you prefer to be the couple who invites a third person in, would you rather be the third person, or would you prefer three non-romantic people who just need a good fuck?
Hmm 🤔 tbh not totally sure. Maybe being in the couple but it would be very partner dependent. I could also see enjoying being the unicorn.
Do you want all the attention on you, or do you want the other two to spend some time on each other while you watch?
In my fantasies, I generally prefer the attention. I’m sure this comes as a shock to all.
Would you prefer to be in your bed, their bed, or a neutral area?
Their bed or neutral
On your way out through the threeway gift shop, do you want to buy the photo of your climax, or are you good with just the memory?
I was never one to purchase the splash mountain photo… I’ll stick with the memory
Is a threeway daisy chain the best approach to everyone getting the proper attention, or is it better to let one person be ravaged by the other two and just take turns?
I think two on one works out the best.
Rate these in the order you would be interested in doing them: FFM, MMF, MFM, FMF, MMM, FFF (when the letters are next to each other it means those two will/can fuck, otherwise there are pre-established rules)
FFM, MFM, MMF, FFF, FMF
 
Based on the recent questions, should I assume your porn viewing has been threesomes lately?
Lol I thought the same thing. Someone is in a mood ;)


In a hypothetical threesome, do you prefer to be the couple who invites a third person in, would you rather be the third person, or would you prefer three non-romantic people who just need a good fuck?
I've been on both sides and I'd say it 1000% depends on the dynamics between partners as to whether it will live up to your best spank bank fantasy or whether you will feel awkward and lost the whole time.
Do you want all the attention on you, or do you want the other two to spend some time on each other while you watch?
I'm perfectly happy not to need to be the center of attention at all times. Everyone else's answers to this in the past make me think that's unusual. Am a threesome supporting class? (puts her nerd talk away and continues on)
Would you prefer to be in your bed, their bed, or a neutral area?
As long as the sheets are clean?
On your way out through the threeway gift shop, do you want to buy the photo of your climax, or are you good with just the memory?
Memories please
Is a threeway daisy chain the best approach to everyone getting the proper attention, or is it better to let one person be ravaged by the other two and just take turns?
Maybe it's the drama kid in me? Isn't it better to let everyone have their moment in the spotlight? We are all going to have fun. It's a fluid experience (no pun intended) and as long as everyone feels heard and wanted during the experience, I don't think it matters that is be continuous?
Rate these in the order you would be interested in doing them: FFM, MMF, MFM, FMF, MMM, FFF (when the letters are next to each other it means those two will/can fuck, otherwise there are pre-established rules)
Ok this is the questions I really came to answer!

As a bi girl, some form of two women and one man will always be my favorite. Though FFF.... a new thought but not an unpleasant one! However, my thoughts on a MFM dynamic is always evolving. I think most women have a sexy fantasy of being ravaged by two men. It's a hot one! But for me, I think this one remains firmly in the Things That Should Stay A Fantasy realm. I think a man's energy changes when there is another man involved. Even with the toppiest of Doms, there is vulnerability a man shows when he is alone with a woman and, in my experience, that energy and openness changes when the masculine energy doubles. I've noticed this even just bringing up another man in hypotheticals. This isn't a bash men post at all! I'm sure women change to some degree with another woman present but overly masculine energy isn't my vibe anyway and, even in fantasy, my overthinking brain recognizes that I would feel the need to put both men at ease in a way that would take me out of any sexy headspace. Maybe I'm underestimating the bi guys? To my knowledge, I haven't been with one and I can see how that may change things a bit.
 
As a bi girl, some form of two women and one man will always be my favorite. Though FFF.... a new thought but not an unpleasant one! However, my thoughts on a MFM dynamic is always evolving. I think most women have a sexy fantasy of being ravaged by two men. It's a hot one! But for me, I think this one remains firmly in the Things That Should Stay A Fantasy realm. I think a man's energy changes when there is another man involved. Even with the toppiest of Doms, there is vulnerability a man shows when he is alone with a woman and, in my experience, that energy and openness changes when the masculine energy doubles. I've noticed this even just bringing up another man in hypotheticals. This isn't a bash men post at all! I'm sure women change to some degree with another woman present but overly masculine energy isn't my vibe anyway and, even in fantasy, my overthinking brain recognizes that I would feel the need to put both men at ease in a way that would take me out of any sexy headspace. Maybe I'm underestimating the bi guys? To my knowledge, I haven't been with one and I can see how that may change things a bit.
This is an interesting angle.
I suppose two guys competing would be inevitable and that could ruin the vibe. On the other hand, I bet some women would really like that idea of being the thing they are competing over. 🤔
Probably best for you to have them blow each other first, just to get past that mindset. Then everyone is on even ground. 🤣
 
This is an interesting angle.
I suppose two guys competing would be inevitable and that could ruin the vibe.
I'm not sure it's even competition, maybe that's the word, but it's also just "man armor".
On the other hand, I bet some women would really like that idea of being the thing they are competing over. 🤔
In fantasy only!
Probably best for you to have them blow each other first, just to get past that mindset. Then everyone is on even ground. 🤣
Okayyy ... I'm listening... :unsure:;)
 
Three is the loneliest number.

In a hypothetical threesome, do you prefer to be the couple who invites a third person in, would you rather be the third person, or would you prefer three non-romantic people who just need a good fuck?
In every hypothetical threesome I’ve ever imagined the third was just…someone. A sex robot with no personality or agency. So I guess the couple who invites the generic partner? Like I don’t want to fuck an actual sex robot, so many consent issues there. But oh the social dynamics of a third actual human with wants and desires…uggh no way I can manage that. Which is only one reason they’re all hypothetical.

And, just logistically, we already have issues not accidentally pulling each others hair or inadvertent pinching when changing positions as it is. A third person. So many head bonks would happen.
Do you want all the attention on you, or do you want the other two to spend some time on each other while you watch?
I think the spotlight can be shared. I like watching. I like pleasuring . I like beong pleasured.
Would you prefer to be in your bed, their bed, or a neutral area?
Neutral probably.
On your way out through the threeway gift shop, do you want to buy the photo of your climax, or are you good with just the memory?
I have a good memory. I don’t need more
Is a threeway daisy chain the best approach to everyone getting the proper attention, or is it better to let one person be ravaged by the other two and just take turns?
See above
Rate these in the order you would be interested in doing them: FFM, MMF, MFM, FMF, MMM, FFF (when the letters are next to each other it means those two will/can fuck, otherwise there are pre-established rules)
I don’t know, they all are about as fun theoretically. I’ll echo @PrettyLilPussy19 and say the man energy is a bit daunting to me. The mechanics of sex with another man are intriguing but I’ve never met a man whose energy was sexual to me. And I don’t really desire multiple women a lot besides the aesthetics of the process, I’m kinda a one person at a time guy (another reason it’s super hypothetical) So probably FFM is my favorite, so we can both please her utterly and completely. MMM is least attractive, I find boobs sorta central to my arousal. But I mean it’s not a hard no.
 
Last edited:
A long time ago, on another website far, far away, a much younger and more naïf Mei5ter was propositioned to be part of an online threesome. It was an interesting experience, even online rather than in-person. Details are slightly changed to protect the less -than-totally innocent.

This couple had a fantasy, which appears to be a fairly common one, where the man watches his partner being fucked by another, better-endowed man - in this case me. Why me? Well, this was an ampics site, and I was new and enthusiastic. I had pictures in my gallery, and apparently they had noticed these and decided I was a good fit for the part, so to speak. Now, threesomes aren't particularly my thing, but this seemed a chance to try an online version of something I'd never otherwise experience, so to cut a long story short I said yes.

The main things I took from that experience were that:
- threesomes aren't just emotionally complicated, but involve serious logistics
- threesomes described by text on a clunky IM system feel like the weirdest Zoom meeting ever
- couples who fantasise about 'a third' don't always have a clear idea of what that third will actually do
- bathos is a thing on a sex site

In this case, it became very clear that this couple hadn't given nuch thought to what comes after the fuck-me-while-he-watches part. In their fantasy, I think the third person just discreetly vanished while they focused on each other for the rest of the night. At the start of things, I was obviously pretty directly involved, and they were clearly both enjoying it. That was hot for me too. But once that part was over, my role in this scene abruptly ended. My job was done, and I had no place there any more.

So I think I just quietly left. Can't quite remember. Like I said, bathos.

I'm glad I tried it. And I'm sure people can and will point out this was 'only' online. But yes, three was indeed the loneliest number that evening.

So my approach to the idea of a threesome nowadays is more...


FML.
I stopped reading after "AmPics" and started daydreaming...
 
Back
Top