Why so many recycled stories?

p_white98

Long time listener
Joined
Feb 27, 2004
Posts
2
I've read A LOT of the stories on here. Many are exceedingly well written and I always give a good Stars. Thanks to those authors.

Lately I'm noticing a lot of the NEW Stories really aren't new. After reading a few paragraphs, I can remember reading the story before. Often a story is only days or weeks old, yet it appears to be written by a different author with a current publication date. I can understand that there may not be 100 submissions per day. There are likely seasonal trends.

Just wondering if anyone else notices this?
 
There might be a glitch happening, though. I noticed that a story by @AlinaX got published on 7/28 and then again on 8/5, with all of its stats apparently intact (as displayed on the hub page, anyway). I kind of shrugged it off as probably an edit that got quickly processed, but there's a possibility that a bug is double-posting stories sometimes.
 
I've read A LOT of the stories on here. Many are exceedingly well written and I always give a good Stars. Thanks to those authors.

Lately I'm noticing a lot of the NEW Stories really aren't new. After reading a few paragraphs, I can remember reading the story before. Often a story is only days or weeks old, yet it appears to be written by a different author with a current publication date. I can understand that there may not be 100 submissions per day. There are likely seasonal trends.

Just wondering if anyone else notices this?
I think it’s lack of creativity. There’s so much cliche and it seems like most readers are okay with that. When I began writing here, I hadn’t read much in the way of eroticism and that brought some originality to my stories. You can read those here or at my original page ( Cicero6 ). I lost access to that one but it’s still up.
 
There might be a glitch happening, though. I noticed that a story by @AlinaX got published on 7/28 and then again on 8/5, with all of its stats apparently intact (as displayed on the hub page, anyway). I kind of shrugged it off as probably an edit that got quickly processed, but there's a possibility that a bug is double-posting stories sometimes.
I requested a title change.
 
I think there are numerous recycled stories. Is it systemic? When I read a story which I remember, I try to search for the original. Nothing Found... If it was plagiarism, the original story should still be there. I've yet to find such a case.
 
Lack of originality and creativity.

That said, we all recycle the usual tropes. Sometimes the best we can aspire to is to put our own unique spin on a classic story trope.
Sometimes it's worth going back and revisiting one of your older works. I decided to continue a very old series (from five years ago) because I saw interesting aspects of a character who had been had a secondary presence in the original. I did reprise some events from earlier chapters to make things clearer. I guess the basic plot is a classic trope, but I think I've found some unique spins on it.
 
Is it the same story, or the same plot arc?
Without getting all "Hero with a 1000 faces" on you, there really are only so many plots to go around. Stories are often variations on universal themes. Ferngully, Avatar, and Dances with Wolves are all the same story. Often what makes a story great is how well it's executed.
 
Makes sense. I was just a bit surprised to see it get posted to the new list again, since edits usually don't do that. Or at least not in the past.
I had a story edit to change the title and it went back on the new list. It was a nice bump in views even though commenters were wondering how an old story got on the new list.
 
I had a story edit to change the title and it went back on the new list. It was a nice bump in views even though commenters were wondering how an old story got on the new list.
It surprises me that such is the case. It kind of feels like double-dipping in a way. I had gotten the impression that edits didn't put things back on the front page, but clearly I was mistaken.
 
It surprises me that such is the case. It kind of feels like double-dipping in a way. I had gotten the impression that edits didn't put things back on the front page, but clearly I was mistaken.
Maybe it's just for titles. I don't know, I've only ever done the one edit.
 
Back
Top