delete

[HawkerPenn]

delete

 

[Saint_Ann]

delete

Best. Thread. Ever!

 

[73Seahawks]

Trump and his group of cronies are NOT going to stop until they bring back slavery and forced rapes.

 

[Typo Fu Master]

Trump and his group of cronies are NOT going to stop until they bring back slavery and forced rapes.

Wow.

I love how so many people are mind readers and can predict the future.

That's a pretty extreme take.

 

[Lance_Castro]

Best. Thread. Ever!

This one was nearly as good:

https://forum.literotica.com/threads/removed-by-author.1610664/

 

[Baztrachian]

Trump and his group of cronies are NOT going to stop until they bring back slavery and forced rapes.

You want slavery? Take out a student loan.

You want rape? Bring in Muslim immigrants.

I don't recall Trump advocating either.

 

[RoryN]

You want rape? Bring in Muslim immigrants.

^^^
Racist Deplorables are getting much bolder about their racism. It makes them easier to spot.

 

[Baztrachian]

^^^
Racist Deplorables are getting much bolder about their racism. It makes them easier to spot.

Statistics are racist.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/283100/recorded-rape-offences-in-england-and-wales/

 

[Lance_Castro]

^^^
Racist Deplorables are getting much bolder about their racism. It makes them easier to spot.

That Billie Eilish is a racist now too!

 

[Pad_Foot]

Statistics are racist.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/283100/recorded-rape-offences-in-england-and-wales/

View attachment 2556445

This graph alone says the English are being raped more. So?
Who are the people being raoed and who’s taping them ??
Their answer? They are cutting back on internet sites like Literotica.

Your theory is?

 

[RoryN]

Statistics are racist.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/283100/recorded-rape-offences-in-england-and-wales/

View attachment 2556445

Thank you for continuing to illustrate your racism for everyone to see.

 

[Baztrachian]

Thank you for continuing to illustrate your racism for everyone to see.

I hope you have daughters and they travel to England with the same beliefs that you have.

 

[RoryN]

I hope you have daughters and they travel to England with the same beliefs that you have.

You hope my daughters get raped?

I have obviously triggered you very badly. That generally only happens when I correctly out someone as a racist.

Score! Thanks for playing, racist.

 

[HisArpy]

You hope my daughters get raped?

He didn't say that. YOU inferred it, but he didn't SAY it.

I have obviously triggered you very badly. That generally only happens when I correctly out someone as a racist.

Or people get tired of your insufferable bullshit.

Score! Thanks for playing, racist.

See what I mean?

 

[RoryN]

He didn't say that. YOU inferred it, but he didn't SAY it.

***

You want rape? Bring in Muslim immigrants.

Thank you for continuing to illustrate your racism for everyone to see.

I hope you have daughters and they travel to England with the same beliefs that you have.

We've already established you're a garbage lawyer. But please, build our case even further.

 

[HisArpy]

***







We've already established you're a garbage lawyer. But please, build our case even further.

QUOTE where he said he wanted to see your daughters raped. If you can't then YOU'RE INFERRING IT.

You know why? Because you're a LIAR and a WELSHER.

Now, let's see some more deflection and Ad Hom name calling like you say only conservatives engage in.

 

[dmallord]

QUOTE where he said he wanted to see your daughters raped. If you can't then YOU'RE INFERRING IT.

You know why? Because you're a LIAR and a WELSHER.

Now, let's see some more deflection and Ad Hom name calling like you say only conservatives engage in.

Arpy, no one claimed the first guy said he wanted anyone’s daughters raped. What was observed—and rightly so—was the tone and implications of his words. “I hope you have daughters…” isn’t subtle. It’s a threat cloaked in moral panic. If you think people don’t pick up on that, you’re playing dumber than you usually are. And if you’re sincerely trying to defend it as a neutral statement, then maybe step back and ask yourself why that was the chosen emotional appeal.

As for your shouting about inference—yes, inference is allowed. Courts do it. Juries do it. Humans do it. We infer tone, motive, intent—especially when someone uses loaded language. In this case, the inference wasn't about whether he literally said something, but whether he intended to weaponize fear to make a racial argument. You know that. But instead of addressing the substance, you leapt to name-calling and courtroom theater.

Now you’re throwing around words like “liar” and “welshing” as if those distract from the original issue: A bad-faith racial narrative was presented using an unrelated graph, challenged appropriately, and then met with vitriol when the argument collapsed. That’s not justice. That’s just performance.

If you’re here to debate facts and ideas, do it. But don’t pretend that outrage and accusations make your case stronger. They don’t. They just make you louder. You couldn't defend the indefensible. You're just not that good, IMO.

 

[Baztrachian]

You hope my daughters get raped?

I did not say that. I said, I hope you have daughters and they travel to England with the same beliefs that you have.

You have called me a RACIST for saying that women are at risk in the UK because of Muslim invaders. You DENY that there's a problem.

If you think your daughters would be at risk if they traveled to the UK with your same beliefs then you are agreeing with me.

I am not the problem here. You are. You need to rethink what you assert in public because when confronted with the possible personal ramifications of your beliefs you recoil in horror.

 

[Baztrachian]

He didn't say that. YOU inferred it, but he didn't SAY it.

Exactly.

Rory could have replied with, "If my girls went to the UK they'd be just fine because there's no danger there." then I would have said Vaya con Dios mi amigo and let it go.

Instead he chose to infer a threat because in truth he knows there's a threat even if he can't let his woke mind process that fact.

 

[Baztrachian]

Also @RoryN is I am not a racist and it is not my imagination that the UK has a problem with Muslims assaulting their girls.

https://forum.literotica.com/thread...g-point-ricky-gervais.1638501/#post-101348767

 

[Rightguide]

Thank you for continuing to illustrate your racism for everyone to see.

Accusing racism is your coping mechanism, your emotional support accusation. When logic corners you, when evidence laughs in your face, you curl into the fetal position of grievance and cry ‘racist’ like it’s a safe word for bad ideas.

 

[Rightguide]

If you’re here to debate facts and ideas, do it. But don’t pretend that outrage and accusations make your case stronger. They don’t. They just make you louder. You couldn't defend the indefensible. You're just not that good, IMO.

Here's some facts for you:

Police recorded 67,928 rape offences in England and Wales in the year ending March 2024—almost six times higher than the 12,295 offences logged in 2002/03. The Sun+15Reddit+15Reddit+15Office for National Statistics+8Statista+8House of Lords Library+8

Why?

 

[HisArpy]

Arpy, no one claimed the first guy said he wanted anyone’s daughters raped. What was observed—and rightly so—was the tone and implications of his words. “I hope you have daughters…” isn’t subtle. It’s a threat cloaked in moral panic. If you think people don’t pick up on that, you’re playing dumber than you usually are. And if you’re sincerely trying to defend it as a neutral statement, then maybe step back and ask yourself why that was the chosen emotional appeal.

As for your shouting about inference—yes, inference is allowed. Courts do it. Juries do it. Humans do it. We infer tone, motive, intent—especially when someone uses loaded language. In this case, the inference wasn't about whether he literally said something, but whether he intended to weaponize fear to make a racial argument. You know that. But instead of addressing the substance, you leapt to name-calling and courtroom theater.

Now you’re throwing around words like “liar” and “welshing” as if those distract from the original issue: A bad-faith racial narrative was presented using an unrelated graph, challenged appropriately, and then met with vitriol when the argument collapsed. That’s not justice. That’s just performance.

If you’re here to debate facts and ideas, do it. But don’t pretend that outrage and accusations make your case stronger. They don’t. They just make you louder. You couldn't defend the indefensible. You're just not that good, IMO.

Oh you poor poor fool, Bless Your Heart.

 

[dmallord]

Oh you poor poor fool, Bless Your Heart.

Same here, blowheart. So, what's your reply? Got anything that counters my words? Evidently not. Your usual go-to crappy reply.

 

[dmallord]

Here's some facts for you:

Police recorded 67,928 rape offences in England and Wales in the year ending March 2024—almost six times higher than the 12,295 offences logged in 2002/03. The Sun+15Reddit+15Reddit+15Office for National Statistics+8Statista+8House of Lords Library+8

Why?

"The headline is certainly sensationalized a bit because these are "alleged" rapists, and there are a number of legitimate reasons why these cases do not proceed to prosecution, including a high percentage of accusations that do not fit the definition of a crime. However, 1.5% is extremely below what is typical. In studies i've seen, such as the MAD project, something like 20% of cases proceed to prosecution from the police stage. (US data.)"

You cited this article and it doesn't address your question.

Why? You don't have any correlations to back this up, do you?