Karoline Leavitt
- Thread starter contrifan32
- Start date
BabyBoozer 
eric_erosfan
Cunning Linguist
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2023
- Posts
- 3,115
Lol. For Lane Bryant.
YDB95
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Posts
- 13,629
True, but you can bet he really does hear it, because it's what he wants to hear.
Bodington
Virgin
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Posts
- 241
The most serious condition that sufferers of TDS adversely experience is their needy compulsion to articulate unending vituperation towards every aspect relating to Pres Donald J Trump and his administration. The negative view of Karoline Leavitt as Trump's press secretary is just an example. However, I would suggest that an indifferent observer (i.e. one who does not hate Trump willy nilly nor is enamored with him either for that matter) would have no cause to decry to date Leavitt's performance in this job.
YDB95
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Posts
- 13,629
And when the right-wingers called both of Biden's press secretaries every nasty name in the book, that was based on a clear-eyed assessment of hard facts, right?
73Seahawks
Virgin
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2024
- Posts
- 2,073
Leavitt still freaking HOT despite my deep disdain for her politics and whoring herself for the Trump-isto.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 42,593
And when the right-wingers called both of Biden's press secretaries every nasty name in the book, that was based on a clear-eyed assessment of hard facts, right?
They got called those things because they earned them.
icanhelp1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Posts
- 19,440
Off topic, I watched a segment on newsmax that squatters are moving in on burned out properties and the cops can’t do anything to stop it. Is that true?
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 42,593
Yes. It's not classified as a crime, it's a civil matter involving eviction/unlawful retainer and adverse possession.
icanhelp1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Posts
- 19,440
Why wouldn’t that be on the same level as looting?
Rebel5soul
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2024
- Posts
- 5,024
Some of those laws are ancient. In some states if you can stay there long enough you can take legal title to the property.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 42,593
No, they're squatting on the property and taking civil possession of it.
There's more to it than that. The squatters have to exclude everyone for a set # of years, they have to pay the property taxes during that period and be the exclusive payer of those taxes, and they have to remain on the property during their adverse possession of it.
A court can order them removed if the owner sues and wins. At that point the cops can get involved.
The funny thing is that if the property owner gifts the land to the city/county/state, the squatter get removed immediately for trespassing. This doesn't happen if a private citizen owns the property.
RobDownSouth
No Kings
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 77,746
There's a whole subgenre on Tik Tok of "squatter removal services", companies that use probably not quite legal means to evict squatters from properties.
The biggest "victory" I've seen was an undeveloped 2 acre fenced lot on the outskirts of Los Angeles. A squatter moved his mobile home there and somehow tapped into the power grid. He declared himself "mayor" and invited every lowlife with a trailer or RV to move in, he'd charge them a "lot fee" and offered "free electricity". Place was packed.
The lot itself was owned by some little old lady whose late husband bought it as an investment and never developed it.
It was like a military operation evicting these squatters....squatters genuinely thought they had a "right" to live there.
The biggest "victory" I've seen was an undeveloped 2 acre fenced lot on the outskirts of Los Angeles. A squatter moved his mobile home there and somehow tapped into the power grid. He declared himself "mayor" and invited every lowlife with a trailer or RV to move in, he'd charge them a "lot fee" and offered "free electricity". Place was packed.
The lot itself was owned by some little old lady whose late husband bought it as an investment and never developed it.
It was like a military operation evicting these squatters....squatters genuinely thought they had a "right" to live there.
YDB95
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Posts
- 13,629
It doesn't matter what the ellipsis contains. Any sentence that starts this way, the answer is no, it's not true.
Rebel5soul
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2024
- Posts
- 5,024
I didn't say there weren't conditions, but the owner does have to initiate some action.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 42,593
Yes, a quiet title action in cases of adverse possession and eviction in cases of squatting. The QT can cost 10-12K and the eviction is around 5k-7500. And that's if you can convince the leftist judge that the "rich white property owner" deserves to have his property rights protected by the law instead of adhering to the false mantle of social justice.
